| Literature DB >> 33953640 |
Gregory C Stachelek1, John A Ligon2, Jennifer Vogel1, Adam S Levin3, Nicolas J Llosa2, Brian H Ladle2, Christian F Meyer4, Stephanie A Terezakis1, Carol D Morris3, Matthew M Ladra1, Christine A Pratilas2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with localized Ewing sarcoma will remain disease-free long term, but for those who suffer recurrence, successful treatment remains a challenge. Identification of clinicopathologic factors predictive of recurrence could suggest areas for treatment optimization. We sought to describe our experience regarding predictors of recurrence and patterns of first failure in patients receiving modern systemic therapy for nonmetastatic Ewing sarcoma.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33953640 PMCID: PMC8068528 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6681741
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sarcoma ISSN: 1357-714X
Figure 1Flowchart of identification of patients with localized Ewing sarcoma (ES) treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH). EMR: electronic medical record.
Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics of localized Ewing sarcoma cohort.
| No relapse | Relapse | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 73 | 21 | |
|
| |||
| Age at diagnosis | Median age | 15.8 years | 21.1 years |
| <10 y | 19 (26%) | 1 (5%) | |
| 10–21 y | 24 (33%) | 9 (43%) | |
| >21 y | 30 (41%) | 11 (52%) | |
|
| |||
| Primary tumor site | Appendicular | 18 (25%) | 6 (29%) |
| Axial | 38 (52%) | 11 (52%) | |
| Extraosseous | 17 (23%) | 4 (19%) | |
|
| |||
| Primary tumor size | Median size | 6.4 cm | 8.5 cm |
| Mean size | 7.1 cm | 9.5 cm | |
| ≤5 cm | 25 (34%) | 5 (24%) | |
| 5.1–9.9 cm | 31 (42%) | 6 (29%) | |
| ≥10 cm | 14 (19%) | 8 (38%) | |
| Unknown | 3 (4%) | 2 (10%) | |
|
| |||
| Definitive treatment | Surgery alone | 42 (58%) | 9 (43%) |
| RT alone | 13 (18%) | 5 (24%) | |
| Surgery + RT | 18 (25%) | 7 (33%) | |
|
| |||
| Percent necrosis | ≥95% | 27 (37%) | 2 (10%) |
| <95% | 14 (19%) | 10 (48%) | |
| Unknown or N/A | 32 (44%) | 9 (43%) | |
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier curves of (a) recurrence-free survival and (b) overall survival for the entire cohort of 94 patients with localized Ewing sarcoma.
Figure 3Forest plot of putative risk factors for recurrence of localized Ewing sarcoma. Odds ratios for recurrence with 95% confidence intervals are shown and were obtained by univariable Cox regression modeling. NAC: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; VDC-IE: vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, etoposide; RT: radiotherapy.
Figure 4Kaplan–Meier curves of recurrence-free survival in patients with localized Ewing sarcoma stratified by (a) tumor growth vs. tumor stability or shrinkage following NAC and (b) ≥95% necrosis vs. <95% necrosis following NAC.
Patterns of failure and sites of first recurrence in patients with recurrence of initially localized or metastatic Ewing sarcoma.
| Localized | Metastatic | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 21 | 34 | |
|
| |||
| Metastatic site(s) at time of diagnosis | Lung only | — | 11 (32%) |
| Lung + other | — | 10 (29%) | |
| Bone only | — | 4 (12%) | |
| All other | — | 9 (26%) | |
|
| |||
| Pattern of first failure | Local | 4 (19%) | 1 (8%) |
| Distant | 14 (67%) | 12 (54%) | |
| Both | 3 (14%) | 7 (38%) | |
|
| |||
| Postrecurrence site(s) of distant metastases | Lung only | 9 (53%) | 4 (21%) |
| Lung + other | 5 (29%) | 5 (26%) | |
| Bone only | 2 (12%) | 4 (21%) | |
| All other | 1 (6%) | 6 (32%) | |