Literature DB >> 29411177

Pseudarthrosis in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of incidence, characteristics, and risk factors.

Nathan E How1, John T Street2, Marcel F Dvorak2, Charles G Fisher2, Brian K Kwon2, Scott Paquette2, Justin S Smith3, Christopher I Shaffrey3, Tamir Ailon4.   

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis. This study aims to characterize pseudarthrosis after long-segment fusion in spinal deformity by identifying incidence rates by etiology, risk factors for its development, and common features. Pseudarthrosis can be a painful and debilitating complication of spinal fusion that may require reoperation. It is poorly characterized in the setting of spinal deformity. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for clinical research including spinal deformity patients treated with long-segment fusions reporting pseudarthrosis as a complication. Meta-analysis was performed on etiologic subsets of the studies to calculate incidence rates for pseudarthrosis. Qualitative synthesis was performed to identify characteristics of and risk factors for pseudarthrosis. The review found 162 articles reporting outcomes for 16,938 patients which met inclusion criteria. In general, the included studies were of medium to low quality according to recommended reporting standards and study design. Meta-analysis calculated an incidence of 1.4% (95% CI 0.9-1.8%) for pseudarthrosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, 2.2% (95% CI 1.3-3.2%) in neuromuscular scoliosis, and 6.3% (95% CI 4.3-8.2%) in adult spinal deformity. Risk factors for pseudarthrosis include age over 55, construct length greater than 12 segments, smoking, thoracolumbar kyphosis greater than 20°, and fusion to the sacrum. Choice of graft material, pre-operative coronal alignment, post-operative analgesics, and sex have no significant impact on fusion rates. Older patients with greater deformity requiring more extensive instrumentation are at higher risk for pseudarthrosis. Overall incidence of pseudarthrosis requiring reoperation is low in adult populations and very low in adolescent populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pseudarthrosis; Scoliosis; Spinal Fusion; Spine curvature; Surgical complication

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29411177     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-018-0951-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  15 in total

1.  Low volumetric bone density is a risk factor for early complications after spine fusion surgery.

Authors:  Y Liu; A Dash; A Krez; H J Kim; M Cunningham; F Schwab; A Hughes; B Carlson; A Samuel; E Marty; H Moore; D J McMahon; J A Carrino; R S Bockman; E M Stein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Pseudarthrosis in adult spine deformity surgery: risk factors and treatment options.

Authors:  Manuel Fernandes Marques; Vincent Fiere; Ibrahim Obeid; Yann-Philippe Charles; Khaled El-Youssef; Abi Lahoud; Joe Faddoul; Emmanuelle Ferrero; Guillaume Riouallon; Clément Silvestre; Jean-Charles Le Huec; David Kieser; Louis Boissiere
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Successful salvage strategy using anterior retroperitoneal approach in failed posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A retrospective analisys on lumbar lordosis and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Roberto Bassani; Carlotta Morselli; Agostino Cirullo; Amos Maria Querenghi; Laura Mangiavini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 4.  Successful fusion versus pseudarthrosis after spinal instrumentation: a comprehensive imaging review.

Authors:  John C Benson; Vance T Lehman; Arjun S Sebastian; Noelle A Larson; Ahmad Nassr; Felix E Diehn; John T Wald; Naveen S Murthy
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.995

5.  The postoperative course of mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Hani Chanbour; Steven G Roth; Matthew E LaBarge; Anthony M Steinle; Jeffrey Hills; Amir M Abtahi; Byron F Stephens; Scott L Zuckerman
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-09-05

6.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of fusion rate enhancements and bone graft options for spine surgery.

Authors:  Wagner M Tavares; Sabrina Araujo de França; Wellingson S Paiva; Manoel J Teixeira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Drivers of in-hospital opioid consumption in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Yoji Ogura; Jeffrey L Gum; Portia Steele; Charles H Crawford; Mladen Djurasovic; R Kirk Owens; Joseph Laratta; Morgan Brown; Christy Daniels; John R Dimar; Steven D Glassman; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-03

Review 8.  The Advent of Spinoplastics: Easing the Growing Global Disease Burden of Spinal Injury.

Authors:  Matthew M Delancy; Aurelia Perdanasari; Matthew J Davis; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Jordan Kaplan; Sebastian J Winocour; Edward M Reece; Alfred Sutrisno Sim
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 9.  Failure in Lumbar Spinal Fusion and Current Management Modalities.

Authors:  Alex Cruz; Alexander E Ropper; David S Xu; Michael Bohl; Edward M Reece; Sebastian J Winocour; Edward Buchanan; Geoffrey Kaung
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.314

10.  Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant "Failure" in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review.

Authors:  Anuj Gupta; Kalidutta Das; Kuldeep Bansal; Harvinder Singh Chhabra; Mohit Arora
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.