| Literature DB >> 33949086 |
Aparajitha Srinivasan1, Roland W Herzog2, Imran Khan1, Alexandra Sherman2, Thais Bertolini2, Tung Wynn3, Henry Daniell1.
Abstract
Anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation is a major complication in treatment of the X-linked bleeding disorder haemophilia B (deficiency in coagulation factor IX, FIX). Current clinical immune tolerance protocols are often not effective due to complications such as anaphylactic reactions against FIX. Plant-based oral tolerance induction may address this problem, as illustrated by the recent first regulatory approval of orally delivered plant cells to treat peanut allergy. Our previous studies showed that oral delivery of plant cells expressing FIX fused to the transmucosal carrier CTB (cholera toxin subunit B) in chloroplasts suppressed ADA in animals with haemophilia B. We report here creation of the first lettuce transplastomic lines expressing a coagulation factor, in the absence of antibiotic resistance gene. Stable integration of the CTB-FIX gene and homoplasmy (transformation of ˜10 000 copies in each cell) were maintained in both T1 and T2 generation marker-free plants. CTB-FIX expression in lyophilized leaves of T1 and T2 marker-free plants was 1.0-1.5 mg/g dry weight, confirming that the marker excision did not affect antigen levels. Oral administration of CTB-FIX to Sprague Dawley rats at 0.25, 1 or 2.5 mg/kg did not produce overt adverse effects or toxicity. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) is at least 2.5 mg/kg for a single oral administration in rats. Oral administration of CTB-FIX at 0.3 or 1.47 mg/kg either mixed in food or as an oral suspension to Beagle dogs did not produce any observable toxicity. These toxicology studies should facilitate filing of regulatory approval documents and evaluation in haemophilia B patients.Entities:
Keywords: anaphylaxis; antibiotic resistance free plants; oral protein drug delivery; regulatory approval; tolerance induction; toxicology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33949086 PMCID: PMC8486253 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13608
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Biotechnol J ISSN: 1467-7644 Impact factor: 13.263
Figure 1Evaluation of site‐specific integration, homoplasmy, expression and pentameric assembly of marker‐free CTB‐FIX lettuce transplastomic lines. Schematic depiction of CTB‐FIX gene in the expression cassette of lettuce chloroplast marker‐free vector and the process of marker excision (a). Confirmation of selectable marker gene‐free lettuce lines by seed germination assay. Seeds of MFCTBFIX (T2) and wild‐type (WT) lettuce were surface‐sterilized and germinated on plates containing half‐MS medium and that supplemented with spectinomycin 50 mg/L. Bleached phenotype of germinated seedlings of LSMFCTBFIX were observed after 10 days on antibiotic marker containing medium (b). PCR analysis to confirm site‐specific integration of LSMFCTBFIX: T0 (Lane 4), T1 (Lane 5) and T2 (Lanes 6‐8) generation plants. Lane 2 represents positive control from LSCTBFIX plant carrying the antibiotic resistance marker and Lane 1 contains the 1‐kb DNA Ladder (c). Southern blot analysis of LSMFCTBFIX transplastomic lines. A single band of 6.6 kb after digestion of gDNA (2 µg) with BglII confirms CTB‐FIX gene integration, marker excision and homoplasmy in MF transplastomic plants. Lane 1,9: 1 kb DNA Ladder, Lane 2: LSCTBFIX with marker DNA as positive control (7.1 kb); Lane 3: LSMFCTBFIX T0 generation, Lane 4: LSMFCTBFIX T1 generation, Lanes 5‐7: LSMFCTBFIX T2 generation; Lane 8: untransformed wild type (WT: 3.8 kb). Expected sizes are indicated in red arrowhead (d). Western blot analysis and quantification of Ls‐MF‐CTB‐FIX in lettuce total leaf protein (TLP) from T0, T1 and T2 transplastomic lines loaded at 5, 10.0 µg TLP per lane. CTB is used as a standard at 2, 4 and 6 ng, respectively, while WT TLP served as the negative control. The expected protein size of CTB‐FIX and CTB is marked (e). GM1‐binding assay of LSMFCTBFIX. Total soluble protein (TSP) from T0, T1 and T2 generation plants at 350 µg was used for the assay. CTB (5, 10 ng) standard was used as the positive control while 3% milk, GM1 and 350 µg TSP from lyophilized untransformed wild‐type (WT) lettuce were used as negative controls. Data shown are mean ± SD of triplicates (f).
Summary of haematological parameters of male Sprague Dawley rats as observed on Day 3 (relative to the start date) after a single oral gavage of LS‐CTB‐FIX
| Haematology | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | |
| LSCTBFIX | 0 mg/kg | 0.25 mg/kg | 1.0 mg/kg | 2.5 mg/kg | |
| White Blood Cells (×103/µL) | Mean | 11.147 I | 10.683 | 10.693 | 9.147 |
| SD | 2.399 | 0.860 | 1.055 | 0.436 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Red Blood Cells (×106/µL) | Mean | 5.897 I | 5.947 | 6.273 | 6.000 |
| SD | 0.319 | 0.445 | 0.350 | 0.286 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Haemoglobin (g/dL) | Mean | 12.37 I | 12.47 | 13.00 | 13.20 |
| SD | 0.47 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.78 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Haematocrit (%) | Mean | 42.13 I | 42.30 | 44.37 | 44.40 |
| SD | 1.96 | 3.30 | 3.69 | 1.84 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| MCV (fL) | Mean | 71.43 I | 71.13 | 70.70 | 73.97 |
| SD | 2.04 | 1.08 | 2.15 | 1.60 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| MCH (pg) | Mean | 20.97 I | 20.97 | 20.70 | 22.00 |
| SD | 0.78 | 0.15 | 0.52 | 0.70 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| MCHC (g/dL) | Mean | 29.33 I | 29.50 | 29.33 | 29.73 |
| SD | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 0.57 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| RDW (%) | Mean | 14.90 I | 13.80 | 14.60 | 13.10 d |
| SD | 0.20 | 0.62 | 1.14 | 0.62 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Platelet Count (×103/µL) | Mean | 935.0 I | 930.0 | 1035.0 | 777.7 |
| SD | 117.5 | 94.0 | 225.8 | 127.2 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Mean Platelet Volume (fL) | Mean | 7.60 I | 7.63 | 7.53 | 7.63 |
| SD | 0.60 | 0.21 | 0.40 | 0.06 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Per cent Neutrophils (%) | Mean | 13.77 I | 14.13 | 11.43 | 11.70 |
| SD | 0.61 | 3.32 | 3.44 | 0.36 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Per cent Lymphocytes (%) | Mean | 82.40 I | 81.23 | 84.30 | 84.17 |
| SD | 2.14 | 2.16 | 4.78 | 0.35 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Per cent Monocytes (%) | Mean | 2.37 I | 3.20 | 2.87 | 2.80 |
| SD | 0.42 | 0.95 | 1.29 | 0.00 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Per cent Eosinophils (%) | Mean | 0.87 I | 0.90 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| SD | 0.42 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.2 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Per cent Basophils (%) | Mean | 0.67 I | 0.53 | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| SD | 0.23 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.31 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Neutrophils (Absolute) (×103/µL) | Mean | 1.557 R | 1.490 | 1.233 | 1.070 |
| SD | 0.515 | 0.243 | 0.438 | 0.020 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Lymphocytes (Absolute) (×103/µL) | Mean | 9.150 I | 8.687 | 9.000 | 7.700 |
| SD | 1.730 | 0.934 | 0.812 | 0.373 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Monocytes (Absolute) (×103/µL) | Mean | 0.263 I | 0.347 | 0.317 | 0.257 |
| SD | 0.084 | 0.133 | 0.162 | 0.012 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Eosinophils (Absolute) (×103/µL) | Mean | 0.103 I | 0.097 | 0.077 | 0.067 |
| SD | 0.055 | 0.031 | 0.006 | 0.015 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Basophils (Absolute) (×103/µL) | Mean | 0.080 I | 0.057 | 0.070 | 0.060 |
| SD | 0.036 | 0.012 | 0.017 | 0.026 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Per cent Reticulocyte (%) | Mean | 10.560 I | 10.353 | 9.603 | 9.577 |
| SD | 0.810 | 1.115 | 0.594 | 0.657 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Reticulocyte (Absolute) (×109/µL) | Mean | 621.87 I | 613.33 | 601.73 | 574.37 |
| SD | 38.65 | 43.44 | 38.52 | 39.43 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
MCV, Mean Corpuscular Volume; MCH, Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin; MCHC, Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration; RDW, Red Blood Cell Distribution Width.
I – Automatic Transformation: Identity (No Transformation).
d – Test: Dunnett two‐sided P < 0.05.
R – Automatic Transformation: Rank.
Changes in clinical chemistry of male Sprague Dawley rats as observed on Day 3 (relative to the start date) after a single oral gavage of LS‐CTB‐FIX
| Clinical chemistry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | |
| LSCTBFIX | 0 mg/kg | 0.25 mg/kg | 1.0 mg/kg | 2.5 mg/kg | |
| Blood Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) | Mean | 13.7 I | 13.3 | 15.0 | 15.7 |
| SD | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.6 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | Mean | – | – | 0.170 | 0.190 |
| SD | – | – | – | – | |
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | Mean | 150.3 I | 151.7 | 167.7 | 160.7 |
| SD | 5.5 | 5.5 | 17.5 | 2.5 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| AST (U/L) | Mean | 92.0 I | 91.3 | 97.0 | 99.3 |
| SD | 15.0 | 5.9 | 7.2 | 8.5 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| ALT (U/L) | Mean | 53.0 R | 58.0 | 61.7 | 56.0 |
| SD | 6.1 | 6.2 | 5.7 | 6.1 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) | Mean | 343.0 I | 325.0 | 490.7 d | 378.0 |
| SD | 13.5 | 53.0 | 77.8 | 78.0 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) | Mean | – | – | – | – |
| SD | – | – | – | – | |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | Mean | 144.7 R | 143.7 | 144.3 | 145.3 |
| SD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Potassium (mmol/L) | Mean | 6.40 I | 6.27 | 6.97 | 6.67 |
| SD | 0.53 | 0.32 | 0.51 | 0.49 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Chloride (mmol/L) | Mean | 101.0 I | 100.3 | 100.3 | 101.7 |
| SD | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.2 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | Mean | 11.40 I | 11.50 | 12.03 | 12.17 |
| SD | 0.26 | 0.53 | 0.74 | 0.67 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Phosphorous (mg/dL) | Mean | 8.70 I | 11.27 d | 10.73 d | 11.07 d |
| SD | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.57 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Total protein (g/dL) | Mean | 5.67 R | 5.47 | 5.63 | 5.57 |
| SD | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.40 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Albumin (g/dL) | Mean | 3.83 I | 3.60 | 3.73 | 3.60 |
| SD | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.17 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Globulin (g/dL) | Mean | 1.83 I | 1.87 | 1.90 | 1.97 |
| SD | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.26 | 0.23 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Alb/Glo Ratio | Mean | 2.0 R | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| SD | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | Mean | 86.7 I | 91.7 | 91.3 | 89.0 |
| SD | 20.6 | 9.2 | 8.7 | 6.1 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | Mean | 124.3 I | 144.3 | 169.7 | 195.7 |
| SD | 30.2 | 56.0 | 35.9 | 41.2 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
AST, Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; Alb/Glo, Albumin‐to‐Globulin ratio.
“–“ : Not Applicable.
I – Automatic Transformation: Identity (No Transformation).
R – Automatic Transformation: Rank.
d – Test: Dunnett two‐sided P < 0.05.
Summary of haematological parameters of male Beagle dogs after a single oral gavage of LS‐CTB‐FIX
| Haematology | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex: male | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | ||
| Day(s) relative to start date | 102 mg/kg in food | 500 mg/kg in food | 102 mg/kg PO Gavage | 500 mg/kg PO Gavage | ||
| White blood cells (×103/µL) | −1 | Mean | 6.705 | 7.000 | 5.740 | 5.965 |
| SD | 1.648 | 1.541 | 1.075 | 0.728 | ||
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | Mean | 6.895 | 6.955 | 5.545 | 5.410 | |
| SD | 1.039 | 0.898 | 1.025 | 1.527 | ||
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Red blood cells (×106/µL) | −1 | Mean | 6.420 | 6.525 | 6.020 | 6.520 |
| SD | 0.071 | 0.375 | 0.198 | 0.014 | ||
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | Mean | 6.415 | 6.355 | 6.140 | 6.325 | |
| SD | 0.177 | 0.488 | 0.156 | 0.262 | ||
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Haemoglobin (g/dL) | −1 | Mean | 14.90 | 15.80 | 14.30 | 16.05 |
| SD | 0.42 | 1.56 | 0.71 | 0.07 | ||
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | Mean | 15.25 | 14.95 | 14.25 | 15.15 | |
| SD | 0.49 | 1.63 | 0.35 | 0.92 | ||
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Haematocrit (%) | −1 | Mean | 43.95 | 43.60 | 41.50 | 44.35 |
| SD | 0.21 | 2.97 | 1.56 | 0.07 | ||
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | Mean | 42.80 | 43.10 | 41.20 | 43.55 | |
| SD | 1.56 | 3.54 | 1.56 | 1.91 | ||
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| MCV (fL) | −1 | Mean | 68.45 | 66.85 | 68.80 | 68.10 |
| SD | 0.35 | 0.78 | 0.28 | 0.14 | ||
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | Mean | 66.70 | 67.85 | 67.10 | 68.80 | |
| SD | 0.57 | 0.35 | 0.85 | 0.28 | ||
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
MCV, Mean Corpuscular Volume.
MCH, Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin; MCHC, Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration; RDW, Red Blood Cell Distribution Width.
Statistical significance indicated on a group with an N < 3 is not valid.
Changes in clinical chemistry of male Beagle dogs after a single oral gavage of LS‐CTB‐FIX
| Clinical Chemistry | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex: male | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | ||
| Day(s) relative to start date | 102 mg/kg in food | 500 mg/kg in food | 102 mg/kg PO Gavage | 500 mg/kg PO Gavage | ||
| Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) | −1 | Mean | 12.0 | 12.0 | 11.0 | 12.0 |
| SD | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.8 | ||
| N | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | Mean | 12.0 | 11.5 | 11.0 | 13.0 | |
| SD | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 4.2 | ||
| N | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | −1 | Mean | 0.770 | 0.720 | 0.670 | 0.680 |
| SD | 0.028 | 0.028 | 0.184 | 0.071 | ||
| N | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | Mean | 0.700 | 0.745 | 0.650 | 0.670 | |
| SD | 0.014 | 0.049 | 0.099 | 0.085 | ||
| N | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | −1 | Mean | 99.5 | 104.5 | 99.5 | 104.5 |
| SD | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 2.1 | ||
| N | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | Mean | 102.0 | 97.0 | 98.5 | 97.5 | |
| SD | 2.8 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 3.5 | ||
| N | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| AST (U/L) | −1 | Mean | 25.5 | 23.5 | 27.5 | 29.0 |
| SD | 2.1 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 1.4 | ||
| N | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | Mean | 25.5 | 24.5 | 26.5 | 29.5 | |
| SD | 0.7 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 7.8 | ||
| N | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| ALT (U/L) | −1 | Mean | 24.5 | 24.5 | 25.5 | 27.5 |
| SD | 3.5 | 0.7 | 4.9 | 7.8 | ||
| N | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | Mean | 24.5 | 24.0 | 28.5 | 27.0 | |
| SD | 0.7 | 2.8 | 7.8 | 4.2 | ||
| N | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
AST, Aspartate Aminotransferase; ALT, Alanine Aminotransferase.
Alb/Glo Ratio Albumin/Globulin Ratio; ‘–' indicates Not Applicable; Statistical significance indicated on a group with an N < 3 is not valid.
Clinical observations and body weights summary following a single oral dose administration of Ls‐CTB‐FIX in male Sprague Dawley rats for pharmacokinetic study
| Clinical Observations | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | |||
|
Observation type: all types From Day 1 (Start Date) to 2 (Start Date) |
Group I 0.49 mg/kg PO |
Group II 0.98 mg/kg PO |
Group III 1.96 mg/kg PO |
| Normal | |||
| Number of Animals Affected | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| First to Last seen | 1–1 | 1–1 | 1–1 |
| Replacement Animal | |||
| Number of Animals Affected | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| First to Last seen | – | – | 1–1 |
| Main Sacrifice | |||
| Number of Animals Affected | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| First to Last seen | 2–2 | 2–2 | 2–2 |
Statistical Test: Anova and Dunnett's Transformation: Automatic; ‘–’ indicates Not Applicable.
Figure 2Proposed Phase I clinical study. Dose escalation: Doses will be informed by preclinical data. Subjects will start at an initial dose. Dose would be escalated once enrolled subjects in each dose cohort fail to show dose‐limiting toxicities. Dose Exposure: A combined single and multiple dose trial design is shown. Initial subjects are exposed to a single dose. Only once safety parameters are met would subjects be moved into the final multiple dose cohort. Volunteer monitoring: Blood is collected throughout cohorts of the study for laboratory analysis, including inhibitory antibody titres, cellular immune response, haematological parameters and coagulation activity to establish safety at each dose.