BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) etiology is up to 57% heritable, with the remainder attributed to environmental exposures. There are limited studies regarding national level environmental exposures and PC aggressiveness, which was the focus of this study METHODS: SEER was queried to identify PC cases between 2010 and 2014. The environmental quality index (EQI) is a county-level metric for 2000-2005 combining data from 18 sources and reports an overall ambient environmental quality index, as well as 5 environmental quality sub-domains (air, water, land, built, and sociodemographic) with higher values representing lower environmental quality. PC stage at diagnosis was determined and, multivariable logistic regression models which adjusted for age at diagnosis (years) and self-reported race (White, Black, Other, Unknown) were used to test associations between quintiles of EQI scores and advanced PC stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: The study cohort included 252,164 PC cases, of which 92% were localized and 8% metastatic at diagnosis. In the adjusted regression models, overall environmental quality EQI (OR 1.20, CI 1.15-1.26), water EQI (OR: 1.34, CI: 1.27-1.40), land EQI (OR: 1.35, CI: 1.29-1.42) and sociodemographic EQI (OR: 1.29, CI: 1.23-1.35) were associated with metastatic PC at diagnosis. For these domains there was a dose response increase in the OR from the lowest to the highest quintiles of EQI. Black race was found to be an independent predictor of metastatic PC at diagnosis (OR: 1.36, CI: 1.30-1.42) and in stratified analysis by race; overall EQI was more strongly associated with metastatic PC in Black men (OR: 1.53, CI: 1.35-1.72) compared to White men (OR: 1.18, CI: 1.12-1.24). CONCLUSION(S): Lower environmental quality was associated with advanced stage PC at diagnosis. The water, land and sociodemographic domains showed the strongest associations. More work should be done to elucidate specific modifiable environmental factors associated with aggressive PC.
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) etiology is up to 57% heritable, with the remainder attributed to environmental exposures. There are limited studies regarding national level environmental exposures and PC aggressiveness, which was the focus of this study METHODS: SEER was queried to identify PC cases between 2010 and 2014. The environmental quality index (EQI) is a county-level metric for 2000-2005 combining data from 18 sources and reports an overall ambient environmental quality index, as well as 5 environmental quality sub-domains (air, water, land, built, and sociodemographic) with higher values representing lower environmental quality. PC stage at diagnosis was determined and, multivariable logistic regression models which adjusted for age at diagnosis (years) and self-reported race (White, Black, Other, Unknown) were used to test associations between quintiles of EQI scores and advanced PC stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: The study cohort included 252,164 PC cases, of which 92% were localized and 8% metastatic at diagnosis. In the adjusted regression models, overall environmental quality EQI (OR 1.20, CI 1.15-1.26), water EQI (OR: 1.34, CI: 1.27-1.40), land EQI (OR: 1.35, CI: 1.29-1.42) and sociodemographic EQI (OR: 1.29, CI: 1.23-1.35) were associated with metastatic PC at diagnosis. For these domains there was a dose response increase in the OR from the lowest to the highest quintiles of EQI. Black race was found to be an independent predictor of metastatic PC at diagnosis (OR: 1.36, CI: 1.30-1.42) and in stratified analysis by race; overall EQI was more strongly associated with metastatic PC in Black men (OR: 1.53, CI: 1.35-1.72) compared to White men (OR: 1.18, CI: 1.12-1.24). CONCLUSION(S): Lower environmental quality was associated with advanced stage PC at diagnosis. The water, land and sociodemographic domains showed the strongest associations. More work should be done to elucidate specific modifiable environmental factors associated with aggressive PC.
Authors: Rebecca Gilbert; Chris Metcalfe; Steven E Oliver; David C Whiteman; Chris Bain; Andy Ness; Jenny Donovan; Freddie Hamdy; David E Neal; J Athene Lane; Richard M Martin Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Dana Hashim; Paolo Boffetta; Matthew Galsky; William Oh; Roberto Lucchini; Michael Crane; Benjamin Luft; Jaqueline Moline; Iris Udasin; Denise Harrison; Emanuela Taioli Journal: Eur J Cancer Prev Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Tyler Etheridge; Jinn-Ing Liou; Tracy M Downs; E Jason Abel; David F Jarrard; Kyle A Richards Journal: J Urol Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: P Lichtenstein; N V Holm; P K Verkasalo; A Iliadou; J Kaprio; M Koskenvuo; E Pukkala; A Skytthe; K Hemminki Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-07-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E Giovannucci; A Ascherio; E B Rimm; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; W C Willett Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1995-12-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: E Giovannucci; E B Rimm; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; A Ascherio; C G Chute; C C Chute; W C Willett Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-10-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Amit D Joshi; Román Corral; Chelsea Catsburg; Juan Pablo Lewinger; Jocelyn Koo; Esther M John; Sue A Ingles; Mariana C Stern Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 4.741
Authors: Daniel J George; Lorelei A Mucci; Ilkania M Chowdhury-Paulino; Caroline Ericsson; Randy Vince; Daniel E Spratt Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 5.455