Literature DB >> 33947910

Surgical outcomes with high and low pulse energy femtosecond laser systems for cataract surgery.

Hung-Yuan Lin1,2, Ya-Jung Chuang3, Pi-Jung Lin4.   

Abstract

Currently, there is no clear consensus in cataract surgery if low compared to high energy femto-lasers may enable better capsulotomy quality and induce lower inflammatory response. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the intra-operative outcomes achieved with high and low pulse energy femtosecond laser systems for cataract surgery. The charts of 200 eyes of 200 patients aged 68.3 ± 10.3 years who had undergone femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using either group 1 high pulse energy: LenSx (Alcon Laboratories) (N = 100) or group 2 low pulse energy: FEMTO LDV Z8 (Ziemer) (N = 100) laser were reviewed retrospectively. Integrity of anterior capsulotomy, classified as (1) complete (free-floating or with minor microadhesions), (2) incomplete and (3) with capsular tears, intraoperative completeness of the clear corneal incisions (CCI, main incision and side port), incidences of intraoperative miosis and incidence of subconjunctival hemorrhage were evaluated and compared between the two groups. The proportion of complete capsulotomies was significantly higher in the group 2 than the group 1 (100% vs 94%; p = 0.03). The incidences of intraoperative miosis (0% vs 19%) and subconjunctival hemorrhage (1% vs 63%) were significantly lower in the group 2 than the group 1 (p < 0.001). Completeness of the main incision was comparable (97% vs 95%; p = 0.721) between the two groups. Although not statistically significant, the completeness of side-port incision was slightly better in the group 2 than the group 1 (91% vs 86%). Low energy laser system performed significantly better in terms of completeness of capsulotomy, intraoperative miosis and sub-conjunctival hemorrhage, compared with high energy laser; the CCI outcomes were comparable.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33947910     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89046-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  38 in total

1.  Complications of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Zoltan Z Nagy; Agnes I Takacs; Tamas Filkorn; Kinga Kránitz; Andrea Gyenes; Éva Juhász; Gábor L Sándor; Illes Kovacs; Tibor Juhász; Stephen Slade
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Capsulorhexis: Pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mohammadpour; Reza Erfanian; Nasser Karimi
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01

3.  Early experience with the femtosecond laser for cataract surgery.

Authors:  Shveta Jindal Bali; Chris Hodge; Michael Lawless; Timothy V Roberts; Gerard Sutton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Cell death and ultrastructural morphology of femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy.

Authors:  Wolfgang J Mayer; Oliver K Klaproth; Marko Ostovic; Andreas Terfort; Thalia Vavaleskou; Fritz H Hengerer; Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery: outcomes and safety in more than 4000 cases at a single center.

Authors:  Robin G Abell; Erica Darian-Smith; Jeffrey B Kan; Penelope L Allen; Shaun Y P Ewe; Brendan J Vote
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Anterior Capsulotomy Outcomes: A Comparison Between Two Femtosecond Laser Cataract Surgery Platforms.

Authors:  Seth M Pantanelli; Vasilios F Diakonis; Zaina Al-Mohtaseb; Florence Cabot; Nilufer Yesilirmak; George A Kounis; Ibrahim O Sayed-Ahmed; Daniel Waren; Sonia H Yoo; Kendall E Donaldson
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Initial evaluation of a femtosecond laser system in cataract surgery.

Authors:  John S M Chang; Ivan N Chen; Wai-Man Chan; Jack C M Ng; Vincent K C Chan; Antony K P Law
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Anterior capsulotomy integrity after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Robin G Abell; Peter E J Davies; David Phelan; Karsten Goemann; Zachary E McPherson; Brendan J Vote
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Comparative evaluation of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification in white cataract.

Authors:  Jeewan S Titiyal; Manpreet Kaur; Archita Singh; Tarun Arora; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-22

10.  The effects of a low-energy, high frequency liquid optic interface femtosecond laser system on lens capsulotomy.

Authors:  Geraint P Williams; Ben L George; Yoke R Wong; Xin-Yi Seah; Heng-Pei Ang; Mun Kitt A Loke; Shian Chao Tay; Jod S Mehta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy in children undergoing cataract surgery: a large case series.

Authors:  Irina G Trifanenkova; Aleksandr V Tereshchenko; Sergey V Isaev
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05

2.  Ex-vivo study on the surface quality of corneal lenticule and stroma after low energy femtosecond laser lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Mayank A Nanavaty; Hasan Naveed; Zahra Ashena; Ritika Mukhija
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Effect of Laser-Induced Optical Breakdown on the Structure of Bsa Molecules in Aqueous Solutions: An Optical Study.

Authors:  Egor I Nagaev; Ilya V Baimler; Alexey S Baryshev; Maxim E Astashev; Sergey V Gudkov
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.927

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.