Literature DB >> 33947883

Chloroplast genomes in Populus (Salicaceae): comparisons from an intensively sampled genus reveal dynamic patterns of evolution.

Jiawei Zhou1,2, Shuo Zhang1,2, Jie Wang2,3, Hongmei Shen2,4, Bin Ai5, Wei Gao1,2, Cuijun Zhang2, Qili Fei2, Daojun Yuan1, Zhiqiang Wu1,2,6, Luke R Tembrock7, Sen Li8, Cuihua Gu9, Xuezhu Liao10.   

Abstract

The chloroplast is one of two organelles containing a separate genome that codes for essential and distinct cellular functions such as photosynthesis. Given the importance of chloroplasts in plant metabolism, the genomic architecture and gene content have been strongly conserved through long periods of time and as such are useful molecular tools for evolutionary inferences. At present, complete chloroplast genomes from over 4000 species have been deposited into publicly accessible databases. Despite the large number of complete chloroplast genomes, comprehensive analyses regarding genome architecture and gene content have not been conducted for many lineages with complete species sampling. In this study, we employed the genus Populus to assess how more comprehensively sampled chloroplast genome analyses can be used in understanding chloroplast evolution in a broadly studied lineage of angiosperms. We conducted comparative analyses across Populus in order to elucidate variation in key genome features such as genome size, gene number, gene content, repeat type and number, SSR (Simple Sequence Repeat) abundance, and boundary positioning between the four main units of the genome. We found that some genome annotations were variable across the genus owing in part from errors in assembly or data checking and from this provided corrected annotations. We also employed complete chloroplast genomes for phylogenetic analyses including the dating of divergence times throughout the genus. Lastly, we utilized re-sequencing data to describe the variations of pan-chloroplast genomes at the population level for P. euphratica. The analyses used in this paper provide a blueprint for the types of analyses that can be conducted with publicly available chloroplast genomes as well as methods for building upon existing datasets to improve evolutionary inference.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33947883     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88160-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  58 in total

1.  How do mitochondrial genes get into the nucleus?

Authors:  K Henze; W Martin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  Mitochondrial genomes: anything goes.

Authors:  Gertraud Burger; Michael W Gray; B Franz Lang
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 3.  Why chloroplasts and mitochondria retain their own genomes and genetic systems: Colocation for redox regulation of gene expression.

Authors:  John F Allen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mitochondrial and plastid genome architecture: Reoccurring themes, but significant differences at the extremes.

Authors:  David Roy Smith; Patrick J Keeling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Assessing the fitness consequences of mitonuclear interactions in natural populations.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; Justin C Havird; Daniel B Sloan; Ronald S Burton; Chris Greening; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2018-12-26

6.  Punctuated evolution of mitochondrial gene content: high and variable rates of mitochondrial gene loss and transfer to the nucleus during angiosperm evolution.

Authors:  Keith L Adams; Yin-Long Qiu; Mark Stoutemyer; Jeffrey D Palmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Cytonuclear integration and co-evolution.

Authors:  Daniel B Sloan; Jessica M Warren; Alissa M Williams; Zhiqiang Wu; Salah E Abdel-Ghany; Adam J Chicco; Justin C Havird
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  More than just a powerhouse.

Authors:  Alan C Christensen
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 15.793

9.  History of plastid DNA insertions reveals weak deletion and at mutation biases in angiosperm mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Daniel B Sloan; Zhiqiang Wu
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  The use of chloroplast genome sequences to solve phylogenetic incongruences in Polystachya Hook (Orchidaceae Juss).

Authors:  Narjara Lopes de Abreu; Ruy José Válka Alves; Sérgio Ricardo Sodré Cardoso; Yann J K Bertrand; Filipe Sousa; Climbiê Ferreira Hall; Bernard E Pfeil; Alexandre Antonelli
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  3 in total

1.  Molecular Karyotyping on Populus simonii × P. nigra and the Derived Doubled Haploid.

Authors:  Bo Liu; Sui Wang; Xiaoyan Tao; Caixia Liu; Guanzheng Qu; Quanwen Dou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  An integrated study of Violae Herba (Viola philippica) and five adulterants by morphology, chemical compositions and chloroplast genomes: insights into its certified plant origin.

Authors:  Gengyu Lu; Juanjuan Qiao; Long Wang; Hui Liu; Gang Wu; Yan Zhu; Yucheng Zhao; Guoyong Xie; Minjian Qin
Journal:  Chin Med       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.455

3.  Comparison of Magnoliaceae Plastomes: Adding Neotropical Magnolia to the Discussion.

Authors:  Salvador Guzmán-Díaz; Fabián Augusto Aldaba Núñez; Emily Veltjen; Pieter Asselman; Isabel Larridon; Marie-Stéphanie Samain
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.