Literature DB >> 33947651

Comparative study of patient outcomes between direct to implant and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Glenda Giorgia Caputo1, Enrico Vigato2, Emanuele Rampino Cordaro3, Pier Camillo Parodi3, Maurizio Governa2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction plays a central role in the outcome management of patients with breast cancer, particularly in terms of quality of life (QoL), which must be weighed carefully when considering the available surgical options. In the context of implant-based breast reconstruction, immediate replacement with prosthesis (direct-to-implant (DTI)) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is gaining popularity, at the expense of the traditional two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with tissue expander (TE), and the literature suggests that patients tend to prefer interventions with "immediate" therapeutic efficacy and aesthetic satisfaction that obviate the need for further invasive surgery. We investigated this hypothesis by administering the BREAST-Q™ questionnaire to two groups of patients who had undergone the respective procedures.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional observational study of 192 consecutive mastectomy patients who received implant-based reconstruction, comparing health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), patient-related outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction in patients who had undergone immediate dual plane DTI with ADM (96) versus the two-stage submuscular approach (96). We also counted the number of surgeries required in each group to achieve a definitive outcome.
FINDINGS: Our study revealed no major differences in terms of QoL scores, with the two approaches being largely comparable. However, single-stage reconstruction seems to offer the additional advantages of better satisfaction with the care received, sparing the patient temporary body image dissatisfaction and reducing the number of surgeries required, thereby lessening the burden on the patient, the healthcare system and society as a whole.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADM; BREAST-Q; Breast implant; Breast reconstruction; DTI; Quality of life

Year:  2021        PMID: 33947651     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  4 in total

1.  Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Unilateral and Bilateral Mastectomy: Cross-Sectional Study of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life with BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Annalisa Cogliandro; Rosa Salzillo; Mauro Barone; Stefania Tenna; Barbara Cagli; Paolo Persichetti
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  Letter-to-the-Editor: Two-Stage Expander-Based (EB) or Single-Stage Direct-to-Implant (DTI) Breast Reconstruction-An Ongoing Debate.

Authors:  Bishara Atiyeh; Saif Emsieh
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 3.  Direct-to-Implant Subcutaneous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Complications and Patient's Quality of Life.

Authors:  José Silva; Francisco Carvalho; Marisa Marques
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Immediate Prosthesis Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Ambulatory Surgery Versus Traditional Hospitalization Based on the Propensity Score Matching Method.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Aoxiang Chen; Chaoqi Liu; Bin Zhang
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 2.708

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.