Literature DB >> 33947153

Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Adriana Renzoni1, Francisco Perez2, Marie Thérèse Ngo Nsoga2,3, Sabine Yerly1, Erik Boehm1, Angèle Gayet-Ageron4, Laurent Kaiser1,2,3, Manuel Schibler1,3.   

Abstract

Extended community testing constitutes one of the main strategic pillars in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) targeting the SARS-CoV-2 genome on nasopharyngeal swab samples is currently the reference test. While displaying excellent analytical sensitivity and specificity, this test is costly, often requires a substantial turnaround time, and, more importantly, is subject to reagent and other material shortages. To complement this technology, rapid antigen tests have been developed and made available worldwide, allowing cheap, quick, and decentralized SARS-CoV-2 testing. The main drawback of these tests is the reduced sensitivity when RT-PCR is the gold standard. In this study, we evaluate Visby an innovative, portable, easy-to-use RT-PCR point-of-care (POC) diagnostic device. Our retrospective analysis shows that overall, compared to the Cobas 6800 RT-qPCR assay (Roche), this RT-PCR POC technology detects SARS-CoV-2 RNA with 95% sensitivity (95%CI = 86.3-99%) and 100% specificity (95% CI = 80.5-100%). For samples with cycle-threshold values below 31, we observed 100% sensitivity (95% CI = 66.4-100%). While showing an analytical sensitivity slightly below that of a standard RT-qPCR system, the evaluated Visby RT-PCR POC device may prove to be an interesting diagnostic alternative in the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially combining the practical advantages of rapid antigen tests and the robust analytical performances of nucleic acid detection systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  POCT techniques; SARS-CoV-2; rapid diagnostic techniques

Year:  2021        PMID: 33947153     DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-4418


  26 in total

1.  Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA.

Authors:  T Notomi; H Okayama; H Masubuchi; T Yonekawa; K Watanabe; N Amino; T Hase
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Simultaneous elimination of carryover contamination and detection of DNA with uracil-DNA-glycosylase-supplemented loop-mediated isothermal amplification (UDG-LAMP).

Authors:  Kuangwen Hsieh; Peter L Mage; Andrew T Csordas; Michael Eisenstein; H Tom Soh
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Scope and limitations of the nicking enzyme amplification reaction for the synthesis of base-modified oligonucleotides and primers for PCR.

Authors:  Petra Ménová; Veronika Raindlová; Michal Hocek
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.774

4.  Comparison of Abbott ID Now and Abbott m2000 Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Nasopharyngeal and Nasal Swabs from Symptomatic Patients.

Authors:  Amanda Harrington; Brian Cox; Jennifer Snowdon; Jonathan Bakst; Erin Ley; Patricia Grajales; Jack Maggiore; Stephen Kahn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The determination of release from isolation of COVID-19 patients requires ultra-high sensitivity nucleic acid test technology.

Authors:  Wanqiu Huang; Dachuan Lin; Cuini Wang; Chaohui Bao; Zhaoqi Zhang; Xinchun Chen; Zheng Zhang; Jian Huang
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 6.072

6.  Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Low Volume Real-Time Single Tube Reverse Transcription Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Using an Exo Probe with an Internally Linked Quencher (Exo-IQ).

Authors:  Ole Behrmann; Iris Bachmann; Martin Spiegel; Marina Schramm; Ahmed Abd El Wahed; Gerhard Dobler; Gregory Dame; Frank T Hufert
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  Victor M Corman; Olfert Landt; Marco Kaiser; Richard Molenkamp; Adam Meijer; Daniel Kw Chu; Tobias Bleicker; Sebastian Brünink; Julia Schneider; Marie Luisa Schmidt; Daphne Gjc Mulders; Bart L Haagmans; Bas van der Veer; Sharon van den Brink; Lisa Wijsman; Gabriel Goderski; Jean-Louis Romette; Joanna Ellis; Maria Zambon; Malik Peiris; Herman Goossens; Chantal Reusken; Marion Pg Koopmans; Christian Drosten
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-01

8.  Accuracy of a nucleocapsid protein antigen rapid test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Bo Diao; Kun Wen; Ji Zhang; Jian Chen; Chao Han; Yongwen Chen; Shufeng Wang; Guohong Deng; Hongwei Zhou; Yuzhang Wu
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 8.067

9.  Evaluation of rapid antigen detection kit from the WHO Emergency Use List for detecting SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Gannon C K Mak; Stephen S Y Lau; Kitty K Y Wong; Nancy L S Chow; C S Lau; Edman T K Lam; Rickjason C W Chan; Dominic N C Tsang
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.168

10.  Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal wash specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection in the setting of sampling device shortage.

Authors:  Adrien Calame; Léna Mazza; Adriana Renzoni; Laurent Kaiser; Manuel Schibler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  13 in total

1.  COVID Community-Engaged Testing in Alabama: Reaching Underserved Rural Populations Through Collaboration.

Authors:  Christopher Greer McCollum; Thomas N Creger; Aadia I Rana; Lynn T Matthews; Stefan D Baral; Greer A Burkholder; William A Curry; Latesha Elopre; Faith E Fletcher; Sydney Grooms; Emily B Levitan; Max Michael; Barbara Van Der Pol; Michael J Mugavero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 11.561

2.  Paving the way to point of care (POC) devices for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

Authors:  Karim Kaci; Rafael Del Caño; Mónica Luna; Paula Milán-Rois; Milagros Castellanos; Melanie Abreu; Rafael Cantón; Juan Carlos Galán; Álvaro Somoza; Rodolfo Miranda; Guillermo González de Rivera; Tania García-Mendiola; Encarnación Lorenzo
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  FDA authorized molecular point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 tests: A critical review on principles, systems and clinical performances.

Authors:  Brigitte Bruijns; Laura Folkertsma; Roald Tiggelaar
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron X       Date:  2022-05-21

4.  Evaluation of the Visby medical COVID-19 point of care nucleic acid amplification test.

Authors:  Brooke M Katzman; Amy M Wockenfus; Brandon R Kelley; Brad S Karon; Leslie J Donato
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.281

5.  SARS-CoV-2 detection using reverse transcription strand invasion based amplification and a portable compact size instrument.

Authors:  Maiken W Rosenstierne; Shreya Joshi; E Thomas Danielsen; Helen Webb; Dac Mui Luong; Julie Bjerring; Julie Hindkær; Lærke Jørgensen; Julie Blauenfeldt; Ask Bojesen; Flemming Holck; Johnny Weber Lau; Lars Bangsgaard; Jakob Broberg Lind; Mette Bjergaard Dragheim; Mikkel Rohde Jacobsen; Robert Elkjær; Steven Clauwaert; Kristina Christensen; Charlotta Polacek; Anders Fomsgaard; Tuomas Ojalehto; Antti Tullila; Mirko Brummer; Claus Juel Jensen; Frederikke Holm Jensen; Uffe Vest Schneider; Jan Gorm Lisby; Rikke Lind Jørgensen; Thomas Warthoe; Ebbe Finding; Peter Warthoe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Diagnostic assay and technology advancement for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections causing the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Bidhan C Dhar
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.478

Review 7.  Recent advances and clinical application in point-of-care testing of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Qing Ye; Dezhao Lu; Ting Zhang; Jianhua Mao; Shiqiang Shang
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 20.693

Review 8.  Clinical Performance of Rapid and Point-of-Care Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jimin Kim; Heungsup Sung; Hyukmin Lee; Jae-Seok Kim; Sue Shin; Seri Jeong; Miyoung Choi; Hyeon-Jeong Lee
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.818

9.  COVI3D: Automatic COVID-19 CT Image-Based Classification and Visualization Platform Utilizing Virtual and Augmented Reality Technologies.

Authors:  Samir Benbelkacem; Adel Oulefki; Sos Agaian; Nadia Zenati-Henda; Thaweesak Trongtirakul; Djamel Aouam; Mostefa Masmoudi; Mohamed Zemmouri
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 10.  Recent findings and applications of biomedical engineering for COVID-19 diagnosis: a critical review.

Authors:  Le Minh Bui; Huong Thi Thu Phung; Thuy-Tien Ho Thi; Vijai Singh; Rupesh Maurya; Khushal Khambhati; Chia-Ching Wu; Md Jamal Uddin; Do Minh Trung; Dinh Toi Chu
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.