Literature DB >> 33946471

Influence of Scanning-Aid Materials on the Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Intraoral Scanners for Full-Arch Digital Scanning: An In Vitro Study.

Hyun-Su Oh1, Young-Jun Lim1, Bongju Kim2, Myung-Joo Kim1, Ho-Beom Kwon1, Yeon-Wha Baek3.   

Abstract

This study was performed to verify the influence of scanning-aid materials on the accuracy and time efficiency of full-arch scanning with intraoral scanners. The full-arch reference model was constructed by a 3D printer and scanned with a model scanner to obtain the reference dataset. Four experimental groups (application of ScanCure (SC-80, ODS Co, Incheon, Korea), IP Scan Spray (IP-Division, Haimhausen, Germany) and Vita Powder Scan Spray (Vita Zahnfabrik, Stuttgart, Germany), and no treatment) were designed, and the scans were executed (trueness, n = 5) using two intraoral scanners: I500 (Medit Co., Seoul, Korea) and TRIOS (3shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). All acquired scan data were compared with the reference datasets using the 3D superimposition method and 2D linear measurements. In the 3D analysis, intragroup data were compared with each other (precision, n = 10). Time efficiency was also verified by comparing the scan times of the four experimental groups. In the 3D analysis, the root mean square (RMS) value of the precision of the scanned image was statistically significantly more accurate in the scanning-aid agent-treated groups than in the no-treatment group (p < 0.05). However, the RMS values of trueness and the types of scanning-aid materials were not significantly different. In the 2D measurements, the increased scan distance generated a greater distance deviation. The working time was significantly shorter in the scanning-aid agent groups than in the no-treatment group, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). Therefore, in clinical situations, the application of scanning-aid materials is recommended to reduce scanning time and more efficiently obtain the full-arch scanned image.

Entities:  

Keywords:  full arch; intraoral scanners; precision; scanning-aid materials; time efficiency; trueness

Year:  2021        PMID: 33946471     DOI: 10.3390/ma14092340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


  18 in total

1.  In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between "virtual" and "physical" assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements.

Authors:  Torsten Jemt; Lars Hjalmarsson
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.932

2.  In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions.

Authors:  Andreas Ender; Moritz Zimmermann; Thomas Attin; Albert Mehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study.

Authors:  Frank S Andriessen; David R Rijkens; Wicher J van der Meer; Daniel W Wismeijer
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners.

Authors:  Jason Latham; Mark Ludlow; Anthony Mennito; Abigail Kelly; Zachary Evans; Walter Renne
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Influence of dentist experience with scan spray systems used in direct CAD/CAM impressions.

Authors:  Marion Dehurtevent; Lieven Robberecht; Pascal Béhin
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.

Authors:  Konstantinos Chochlidakis; Panos Papaspyridakos; Alexandra Tsigarida; Davide Romeo; Yo-Wei Chen; Zuhair Natto; Carlo Ercoli
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.

Authors:  Joshua C Treesh; Peter C Liacouras; Robert M Taft; Daniel I Brooks; Sorana Raiciulescu; Daniel O Ellert; Gerald T Grant; Ling Ye
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.

Authors:  Caio César Dias Resende; Tiago Augusto Quirino Barbosa; Guilherme Faria Moura; Lucas do Nascimento Tavares; Fabio Antonio Piola Rizzante; Furat M George; Flávio Domingues das Neves; Gustavo Mendonça
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  An In Vitro Study of Factors Influencing the Performance of Digital Intraoral Impressions Operating on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology with Multiple Implants in the Edentulous Maxilla.

Authors:  Beatriz Gimenez-Gonzalez; Bassam Hassan; Mutlu Özcan; Guillermo Pradíes
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Emir Yuzbasioglu; Hanefi Kurt; Rana Turunc; Halenur Bilir
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  2 in total

1.  Performance of Rigid and Soft Transfer Templates Using Viscous and Fluid Resin-Based Composites in the Attachment Bonding Process of Clear Aligners.

Authors:  Cristina Valeri; Angelo Aloisio; Stefano Mummolo; Vincenzo Quinzi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-02-12

2.  Effect of scanning-aid agents on the scanning accuracy in specially designed metallic models: A laboratory study.

Authors:  Hyun-Su Oh; Young-Jun Lim; Bongju Kim; Myung-Joo Kim; Ho-Beom Kwon; Yeon-Wha Baek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.