Silje Watterdal Syversen1, Guro Løvik Goll1, Kristin Kaasen Jørgensen2, Øystein Sandanger3, Joseph Sexton1, Inge Christoffer Olsen4, Johanna Elin Gehin5,6, David John Warren5, Marthe Kirkesæther Brun1,6, Rolf Anton Klaasen5, Lars Normann Karlsen7, Geir Noraberg8, Camilla Zettel9, Maud Kristine Aga Ljoså10, Anne Julsrud Haugen11, Rune Johan Njålla12, Trude Jannecke Bruun13, Kathrine Aglen Seeberg14, Brigitte Michelsen15, Eldri Kveine Strand16, Svanaug Skorpe17, Ingrid Marianne Blomgren18, Yngvill Hovde Bragnes19, Christian Kvikne Dotterud20, Turid Thune21, Carl Magnus Ystrøm22, Roald Torp23, Pawel Mielnik24, Cato Mørk25, Tore K Kvien1,6, Jørgen Jahnsen2,6, Nils Bolstad5, Espen A Haavardsholm1,6. 1. Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 2. Department of Gastroenterology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway. 3. Section of Dermatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 4. Department of Research Support for Clinical Trials, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 5. Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 6. Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 7. Department of Gastroenterology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway. 8. Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Arendal, Norway. 9. Department of Rheumatology, Betanien Hospital, Skien, Norway. 10. Department of Rheumatology, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway. 11. Department of Rheumatology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Moss, Norway. 12. Department of Rheumatology, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway. 13. Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 14. Departement of Gastroenterology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway. 15. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Kristiansand, Norway. 16. Lillehammer Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Lillehammer, Norway. 17. Haugesund Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Haugesund, Norway. 18. Department of Gastroenterology, Fonna Hospital Trust, Haugesund, Norway. 19. Department of Rheumatology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway. 20. Department of Dermatology, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 21. Department of Dermatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. 22. Department of Medicine, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Elverum, Norway. 23. Department of Medicine, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Hamar, Norway. 24. Department of Neurology, Rheumatology, and Physical Medicine, Førde Hospital Trust, Førde, Norway. 25. Akershus Dermatology Center, Lørenskog, Norway.
Abstract
Importance: Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), defined as individualized drug dosing based on scheduled monitoring of serum drug levels, has been proposed as an alternative to standard therapy to maximize efficacy and safety of infliximab and other biological drugs. However, whether proactive TDM improves clinical outcomes when implemented at the time of drug initiation, compared with standard therapy, remains unclear. Objective: To assess whether TDM during initiation of infliximab therapy improves treatment efficacy compared with standard infliximab therapy without TDM. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial of 411 adults with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, or psoriasis initiating infliximab therapy in 21 hospitals in Norway. Patients were recruited from March 1, 2017, to January 10, 2019. Final follow-up occurred on November 5, 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive proactive TDM with dose and interval adjustments based on scheduled monitoring of serum drug levels and antidrug antibodies (TDM group; n = 207) or standard infliximab therapy without drug and antibody level monitoring (standard therapy group; n = 204). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was clinical remission at week 30. Results: Among 411 randomized patients (mean age, 44.7 [SD, 14.9] years; 209 women [51%]), 398 (198 in the TDM group and 200 in the standard therapy group) received their randomized intervention and were included in the full analysis set. Clinical remission at week 30 was achieved in 100 (50.5%) of 198 and 106 (53.0%) of 200 patients in the TDM and standard therapy groups, respectively (adjusted difference, 1.5%; 95% CI, -8.2% to 11.1%; P = .78). Adverse events were reported in 135 patients (68%) and 139 patients (70%) in the TDM and standard therapy groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases initiating treatment withinfliximab, proactive therapeutic drug monitoring, compared with standard therapy, did not significantly improve clinical remission rates over 30 weeks. These findings do not support routine use of therapeutic drug monitoring during infliximab induction for improving disease remission rates. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03074656.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), defined as individualized drug dosing based on scheduled monitoring of serum drug levels, has been proposed as an alternative to standard therapy to maximize efficacy and safety of infliximab and other biological drugs. However, whether proactive TDM improves clinical outcomes when implemented at the time of drug initiation, compared with standard therapy, remains unclear. Objective: To assess whether TDM during initiation of infliximab therapy improves treatment efficacy compared with standard infliximab therapy without TDM. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial of 411 adults with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, or psoriasis initiating infliximab therapy in 21 hospitals in Norway. Patients were recruited from March 1, 2017, to January 10, 2019. Final follow-up occurred on November 5, 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive proactive TDM with dose and interval adjustments based on scheduled monitoring of serum drug levels and antidrug antibodies (TDM group; n = 207) or standard infliximab therapy without drug and antibody level monitoring (standard therapy group; n = 204). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was clinical remission at week 30. Results: Among 411 randomized patients (mean age, 44.7 [SD, 14.9] years; 209 women [51%]), 398 (198 in the TDM group and 200 in the standard therapy group) received their randomized intervention and were included in the full analysis set. Clinical remission at week 30 was achieved in 100 (50.5%) of 198 and 106 (53.0%) of 200 patients in the TDM and standard therapy groups, respectively (adjusted difference, 1.5%; 95% CI, -8.2% to 11.1%; P = .78). Adverse events were reported in 135 patients (68%) and 139 patients (70%) in the TDM and standard therapy groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases initiating treatment with infliximab, proactive therapeutic drug monitoring, compared with standard therapy, did not significantly improve clinical remission rates over 30 weeks. These findings do not support routine use of therapeutic drug monitoring during infliximab induction for improving disease remission rates. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03074656.
Authors: Geert D'Haens; Severine Vermeire; Guy Lambrecht; Filip Baert; Peter Bossuyt; Benjamin Pariente; Anthony Buisson; Yoram Bouhnik; Jérôme Filippi; Janneke Vander Woude; Philippe Van Hootegem; Jacques Moreau; Edouard Louis; Denis Franchimont; Martine De Vos; Fazia Mana; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet; Hedia Brixi; Matthieu Allez; Philip Caenepeel; Alexandre Aubourg; Bas Oldenburg; Marieke Pierik; Ann Gils; Sylvie Chevret; David Laharie Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Laurie B Grossberg; Konstantinos Papamichael; Joseph D Feuerstein; Corey A Siegel; Thomas A Ullman; Adam S Cheifetz Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: J Berth-Jones; K Grotzinger; C Rainville; B Pham; J Huang; S Daly; M Herdman; P Firth; K Hotchkiss Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: Nicholas A Kennedy; Graham A Heap; Harry D Green; Benjamin Hamilton; Claire Bewshea; Gareth J Walker; Amanda Thomas; Rachel Nice; Mandy H Perry; Sonia Bouri; Neil Chanchlani; Neel M Heerasing; Peter Hendy; Simeng Lin; Daniel R Gaya; J R Fraser Cummings; Christian P Selinger; Charlie W Lees; Ailsa L Hart; Miles Parkes; Shaji Sebastian; John C Mansfield; Peter M Irving; James Lindsay; Richard K Russell; Timothy J McDonald; Dermot McGovern; James R Goodhand; Tariq Ahmad Journal: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-02-27
Authors: Pedro Machado; Robert Landewé; Elisabeth Lie; Tore K Kvien; Jürgen Braun; Daniel Baker; Désirée van der Heijde Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-11-10 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Omoniyi J Adedokun; William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Paul Rutgeerts; Zhenhua Xu; Colleen W Marano; Jewel Johanns; Honghui Zhou; Hugh M Davis; Freddy Cornillie; Walter Reinisch Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Bram Verstockt; Gitte Moors; Sumin Bian; Thomas Van Stappen; Gert Van Assche; Séverine Vermeire; Ann Gils; Marc Ferrante Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Freddy Cornillie; Stephen B Hanauer; Robert H Diamond; Jianping Wang; Kezhen L Tang; Zhenhua Xu; Paul Rutgeerts; Séverine Vermeire Journal: Gut Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Charlotte Krieckaert; Borja Hernández-Breijo; Johanna Elin Gehin; Guillaume le Mélédo; Alejandro Balsa; Meghna Jani; Denis Mulleman; Victoria Navarro-Compan; Gertjan Wolbink; John Isaac; Astrid van Tubergen Journal: RMD Open Date: 2022-06
Authors: Nils Bolstad; Hilde Berner Hammer; Johanna Elin Gehin; Silje Watterdal Syversen; David John Warren; Guro Løvik Goll; Joseph Sexton Journal: RMD Open Date: 2021-12
Authors: Wannee Kantasiripitak; An Outtier; Sebastian G Wicha; Alexander Kensert; Zhigang Wang; João Sabino; Séverine Vermeire; Debby Thomas; Marc Ferrante; Erwin Dreesen Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2022-06-15