BACKGROUND & AIMS: Clinical trials of Crohn's disease generally use the Crohn's Disease Activity Index to assess disease activity; these calculations are complex, time-consuming, and impracticable. We investigated whether a simpler tool, the Harvey-Bradshaw Index, was equally effective in assessing disease severity. METHODS:Crohn's Disease Activity and Harvey-Bradshaw Index scores were collected from 2 large multicenter Crohn's disease studies. The PEGylated antibody fragment evaluation in Crohn's disease: safety and efficacy (PRECiSE) 1 and 2 trials assessed efficacy and tolerability of certolizumab pegol (PEGylated, humanized, Fab' fragment of an antitumor necrosis factor alpha antibody). PRECiSE 1 and 2 data were analyzed to determine if results from the Crohn's Disease Activity Index correlated with those from the Harvey-Bradshaw Index criteria for defining response and remission. RESULTS: Analysis of almost 1000 data pairs showed a positive correlation between scores. The correlation between the indices for pooled data from PRECiSE 1 and PRECiSE 2 was 0.800 (Spearman correlation coefficient). The correlations between indices for the PRECiSE 1 or PRECiSE 2 were 20.698 and 0.716, respectively (Kronecker product variance). A 3-point change in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index score corresponded to a 100-point change in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (clinical response); scores < or =4 points corresponded to a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score < or =150 points (clinical remission). CONCLUSIONS: Results from the Crohn's Disease Activity Index correlate with those from the Harvey-Bradshaw Index; use of the Harvey-Bradshaw Index might permit simpler Crohn's disease activity assessment in long-term clinical trials, and facilitate standardized disease activity measurements and cross-center comparisons. Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Clinical trials of Crohn's disease generally use the Crohn's Disease Activity Index to assess disease activity; these calculations are complex, time-consuming, and impracticable. We investigated whether a simpler tool, the Harvey-Bradshaw Index, was equally effective in assessing disease severity. METHODS:Crohn's Disease Activity and Harvey-Bradshaw Index scores were collected from 2 large multicenter Crohn's disease studies. The PEGylated antibody fragment evaluation in Crohn's disease: safety and efficacy (PRECiSE) 1 and 2 trials assessed efficacy and tolerability of certolizumab pegol (PEGylated, humanized, Fab' fragment of an antitumor necrosis factor alpha antibody). PRECiSE 1 and 2 data were analyzed to determine if results from the Crohn's Disease Activity Index correlated with those from the Harvey-Bradshaw Index criteria for defining response and remission. RESULTS: Analysis of almost 1000 data pairs showed a positive correlation between scores. The correlation between the indices for pooled data from PRECiSE 1 and PRECiSE 2 was 0.800 (Spearman correlation coefficient). The correlations between indices for the PRECiSE 1 or PRECiSE 2 were 20.698 and 0.716, respectively (Kronecker product variance). A 3-point change in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index score corresponded to a 100-point change in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (clinical response); scores < or =4 points corresponded to a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score < or =150 points (clinical remission). CONCLUSIONS: Results from the Crohn's Disease Activity Index correlate with those from the Harvey-Bradshaw Index; use of the Harvey-Bradshaw Index might permit simpler Crohn's disease activity assessment in long-term clinical trials, and facilitate standardized disease activity measurements and cross-center comparisons. Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Balakrishnan S Ramakrishna; Govind K Makharia; Vineet Ahuja; Uday C Ghoshal; Venkataraman Jayanthi; Benjamin Perakath; Philip Abraham; Deepak K Bhasin; Shobna J Bhatia; Gourdas Choudhuri; Sunil Dadhich; Devendra Desai; Bhaba Dev Goswami; Sanjeev K Issar; Ajay K Jain; Rakesh Kochhar; Goundappa Loganathan; Sri Prakash Misra; C Ganesh Pai; Sujoy Pal; Mathew Philip; Anna Pulimood; Amarender S Puri; Gautam Ray; Shivaram P Singh; Ajit Sood; Venkatraman Subramanian Journal: Indian J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-03-14
Authors: Abhinav Vasudevan; Ajay Raghunath; Shane Anthony; Cian Scanlon; Miles P Sparrow; Peter R Gibson; Daniel R van Langenberg Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Toufic A Kabbani; Ioannis E Koutroubakis; Robert E Schoen; Claudia Ramos-Rivers; Nilesh Shah; Jason Swoger; Miguel Regueiro; Arthur Barrie; Marc Schwartz; Jana G Hashash; Leonard Baidoo; Michael A Dunn; David G Binion Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 10.864