| Literature DB >> 33943044 |
Taina T Nieminen1, Sandya Liyanarachchi1, Daniel F Comiskey1, Yanqiang Wang1, Wei Li1, Isabella V Hendrickson1, Pamela Brock2, Albert de la Chapelle1, Huiling He1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We studied a large family with 22 individuals affected with autosomal dominant hereditary spherocytosis (HS).Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990SPTBzzm321990; DNA variant; hereditary spherocytosis; splicing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33943044 PMCID: PMC8172196 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med ISSN: 2324-9269 Impact factor: 2.183
FIGURE 1Pedigree of the hereditary spherocytosis (HS) family. Males are indicated by squares and females are indicated by circles. Generations are labeled using Roman numerals (I, II, III, etc). Solid symbols, affected. The index case is marked by an arrow. $Indicates those individuals whose DNA was studied by WGS and #indicates those studied by linkage analysis. G/G, wild type; G/A, heterozygous variant.
Clinical characteristics of investigated family members.
| Individual | Gender | Age at spherocytosis diagnose | Age at Splenectomy | Blood transfusion at birth | The c.1064+1G>A variant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| III.1 | Female | Unknown | 17 or 18 | Unknown | Yes |
| IV.1 | Male | Birth | 19 or 20 | Unknown | Yes |
| IV.2 | Male | Birth | Unknown | Unknown | Yes |
| IV.3 | Female | Birth | 19 | Unknown | Yes |
| IV.6 | Female | Birth | 16 | Yes | Yes |
| IV.8 | Male | Birth | 5 | Yes | Yes |
| IV.9 | Male | Birth | 24 | Yes | Yes |
| IV.10 | Female | Birth | 17 or 18 | Yes | Yes |
| IV.11 | Male | Birth | 30 s | Yes | Yes |
| V.2 | Female | Birth | 7 | Unknown | Yes |
| V.4 | Male | Birth | 14 | Yes | Yes |
| V.7 | Male | Birth | 12 | Unknown | Yes |
| IV.5 | Male | Unaffected | N/A | N/A | No |
| IV.7 | Male | Unaffected | N/A | N/A | No |
| V.3 | Male | Unaffected | N/A | N/A | No |
Abbreviations: N/A, not applicable.
Reported to have neurologic issues (cerebral palsy) from brain damage that occurred in newborn period from spherocytosis crisis.
FIGURE 2Analysis of the c.1064+1G>A variant in the SPTB gene (NM_001024858.4). (a) RT‐PCR analysis of aberrant splicing using the forward primer in SPTB exon 7 and the reverse primer in exon 9. Total RNA from lymphoblastoid cell lines of four affected members and one unaffected family member was analyzed; two samples are shown in the gel picture (IV‐5, unaffected; III‐1, HS affected). M, molecular marker. The extra spliced product in sample III‐1 is labeled by an arrow. (b) Sanger sequencing chromatogram of the aberrant spliced SPTB product in individual III‐1. The junction of exons 7 and 9 is marked by a vertical line. (c) Diagram of the exon 8 skipping in SPTB showing the forward primer spanning the junction site of exons 7 and 9 and a reverse primer partly in exon 10 for detecting exon 8 skipping. (d) RT‐PCR analysis of aberrant splicing using the unique primer set as shown in (c) with RNA samples from five family members (four affected and one unaffected). M, molecular marker. (e) Diagram of the SPTB wild‐type protein structure and the truncated SPTB caused by the altered allele. CH, Calponin homology domain.