| Literature DB >> 33941164 |
Qingli Chen1, Zhe Shao1,2, Ke Liu1,2, Xiaocheng Zhou1, Lin Wang1, Erhui Jiang1,2, Tingting Luo1, Zhengjun Shang3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies suggest Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) increased the incidence of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, fimA genotypes distribution of Pg, the origination of Pg in tissue, and its prognostic value are inconclusive. We aimed to investigate the frequency of fimA genotypes in OSCC patients, study the association between Pg and OSCC, and explore the prognostic value of Pg.Entities:
Keywords: FimA; Fimbriae; Genotype; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Porphyromonas gingivalis; Prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33941164 PMCID: PMC8091688 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01580-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Specific oligonucleotides used in this study
| Primer | Sequence (5′-3′) | Annealing temperature (°C) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Universal primers | F: TCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGT | 60 | [ |
| R: GGACTACCAGGGTATCTAATCCTGTT | |||
| F: ACCTTACCCGGGATTGAAATG | 58 | [ | |
| R: CAACCATGCAGCACCTACATAGAA | |||
| F: CTGTGTGTTTATGGCAAACTTC | 58 | [ | |
| R: AACCCCGCTCCCTGTATTCCGA | |||
| F: CAGCAGAGCCAAAAACAATCG | 58 | [ | |
| R: TGTCAGATAATTAGCGTCTGC | |||
| F: GCATGATGGTACTCCTTTGA | 58 | [ | |
| R: CTGACCAACGAGAACCCACT | |||
| F: ATTACACCTACACAGGTGAGGC | 58 | [ | |
| R: AACCCCGCTCCCTGTATTCCGA | |||
| F: CTATTCAGGTGCTATTACCCAA | 58 | [ | |
| R: AACCCCGCTCCCTGTATTCCGA | |||
| F: AACAACAGTCTCCTTGACAGTG | 58 | [ | |
| R: TATTGGGGGTCGAACGTTACTGTC | |||
| CAATACTCGTATCGCCCGTTATTC-Digoxin | [ |
Pg: Porphyromonas gingivalis. ISH: In situ hybridization
Overabundance of Pg in saliva from OSCC patient
| Low | High | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OSCC | 84 | 11 | 0.033 |
| OSCC-free | 39 | 0 | |
Fig. 1Expressions of Porphyromonas gingivalis in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) (a), normal tissue adjacent to OSCC (b), and probe-free as negative control (d) by in situ hybridization; Gram staining (c)
Clinicopathological details
| Parameters | Number (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | ||||
| Age (years) | 55.8 ± 12.7 | 95 (100) | 55.7 ± 12.6 | 56.5 ± 14.6 | 0.860 |
| Gender | Male | 65 (68.4) | 57 | 8 | 0.999 |
| Female | 30 (31.6) | 27 | 3 | ||
| Systemic disease | No | 69 (72.6) | 61 | 8 | 0.999 |
| Yes | 26 (27.4) | 23 | 3 | ||
| Pathologic staging | pStage I + II | 69 (72.6) | 65 | 4 | 0.008 |
| pStage III + IV | 26 (27.4) | 19 | 7 | ||
| Smoking | No | 45 (47.4) | 39 | 6 | 0.612 |
| Yes | 50 (52.6) | 45 | 5 | ||
| Alcohol consumption | No | 57 (60.0) | 50 | 7 | 0.999 |
| Yes | 38 (40.0) | 34 | 4 | ||
| Location | Buccal | 21 (24.2) | 21 | 2 | 0.447 |
| Tongue | 52 (54.7) | 47 | 5 | ||
| Gingiva | 11 (11.6) | 9 | 2 | ||
| Floor of mouth | 5 (5.3) | 4 | 1 | ||
| Hard palate | 4 (4.2) | 3 | 1 | ||
| Differentiation grade | Well | 17 (19.1) | 16 | 1 | 0.735 |
| Moderate | 65 (73.0) | 57 | 8 | ||
| Poor | 7 (7.9) | 6 | 1 | ||
| I + Ib | 20 (21.1) | 17 | 3 | 0.795* | |
| II | 30 (31.6) | 27 | 3 | ||
| III | 4 (4.2) | 4 | 0 | ||
| IV | 20 (21.1) | 16 | 4 | ||
| V | 2 (2.1) | 2 | 0 | ||
| I + Ib + II | 1 (1.1) | 1 | 0 | ||
| I + Ib + III | 2 (2.1) | 2 | 0 | ||
| I + Ib + IV | 1 (1.1) | 1 | 0 | ||
| I + Ib + V | 1 (1.1) | 1 | 0 | ||
| II + IV | 3 (3.2) | 3 | 0 | ||
| I + Ib + II + IV | 1 (1.1) | 1 | 0 | ||
| Untyped | 10 (10.5) | 9 | 1 | ||
| Treatment† | Surgery | 64 (68.1) | 60 | 4 | – |
| Surgery + RT or CRT** | 30 (31.9) | 23 | 7 | ||
| Outcome† | Recurrence | 24 (25.5) | 25 | 0 | 0.033 |
| Disease-free | 70 (74.5) | 58 | 11 | ||
| Disease-free time (months) | 23, 10 | 94 (98.9) | 22, 13.8 | 27, 8 | 0.029 |
*Chi-square test was used among fimA genotype I + Ib, II, III, IV, V
†One patient dropped out in follow-up
**RT: Radiotherapy, CRT: Chemo-radiotherapy
The frequency of fimA genotypes in saliva and in oral squamous cell carcinoma tissues
| I + Ib | II | III | IV | V | I + Ib + III | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saliva | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Tissue | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Fig. 2The PCR product examined Porphyromonas gingivalis in saliva (a) and oral squamous cell carcinoma tissue (b)
Fig. 3The homology analysis of Porphyromonas gingivalis detected in saliva and oral squamous cell carcinoma tissue
Fig. 4Cumulative recurrence curve of 94 patients
Fig. 5Disease-free survival according to 94 oral squamous cell carcinoma patients at the time of leaving the hospital. The Kaplan–Meier method for recurrence with the log-rank test was used for statistical comparisons