Literature DB >> 33939876

Mortality and AIDS-defining events among young people following transition from paediatric to adult HIV care in the UK.

H Asad1,2,3, I J Collins1, R L Goodall1,3, S Crichton1, T Hill3, K Doerholt4, C Foster5, H Lyall5, F A Post6, S Welch7, A Winston8, C A Sabin2,3, A Judd1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate risk of AIDS and mortality after transition from paediatric to adult care in a UK cohort of young people with perinatally acquired HIV.
METHODS: Records of people aged ≥ 13 years on 31 December 2015 in the UK paediatric HIV cohort (Collaborative HIV Paediatric Study) were linked to those of adults in the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (CHIC) cohort. We calculated time from transition to a new AIDS event/death, with follow-up censored at the last visit or 31 December 2015, whichever was the earliest. Cumulative incidence of and risk factors for AIDS/mortality were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression.
RESULTS: At the final paediatric visit, the 474 participants [51% female, 80% black, 60% born outside the UK, median (interquartile range) age at antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation = 9 (5-13) years] had a median age of 18 (17-19) years and CD4 count of 471 (280-663) cell/μL; 89% were prescribed ART and 60% overall had a viral load ≤ 400 copies/mL. Over median follow-up in adult care of 3 (2-6) years, 35 (8%) experienced a new AIDS event (n = 25) or death (n = 14) (incidence = 1.8/100 person-years). In multivariable analyses, lower CD4 count at the last paediatric visit [adjusted hazard ratio = 0.8 (95% confidence interval: 0.7-1.0)/100 cells/μL increment] and AIDS diagnosis in paediatric care [2.7 (1.4-5.5)] were associated with a new AIDS event/mortality in adult care.
CONCLUSIONS: Young people with perinatally acquired HIV transitioning to adult care with markers of disease progression in paediatric care experienced poorer outcomes in adult care. Increased investment in multidisciplinary specialized services is required to support this population at high risk of morbidity and mortality.
© 2021 The Authors. HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AIDS; HIV; mortality; transition; young people

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33939876      PMCID: PMC8612219          DOI: 10.1111/hiv.13096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HIV Med        ISSN: 1464-2662            Impact factor:   3.180


Introduction

With advancements in antiretroviral therapy (ART) and subsequent declines in morbidity and mortality, the life expectancy of adults living with HIV in many settings is nearing that of the general population [1, 2]. Similar declines in AIDS events, hospitalizations and mortality in children living with perinatally acquired HIV (PHIV) have also been reported, in particular from high‐income settings [3, 4, 5]. However, less is known about the impact of lifelong exposure to HIV and ART on mortality as this group reaches adolescence and adulthood, and transitions to adult care [6]. In 2015, mortality associated with HIV was the eighth leading cause of adolescent deaths globally [7], but in many settings, following children as they move through paediatric care and transition to adult care is challenging for several reasons, including disjointed health systems and lack of capacity to conduct longitudinal research. Of the studies that have measured mortality in adult care [8, 9, 10, 11, 12], some are smaller cohorts that may not be representative of the wider population of young people living with PHIV in their respective setting. The UK benefits from a national paediatric cohort, which includes all children diagnosed with HIV and in paediatric care, embedded within the National Health Service, and an ongoing large observational cohort of adults receiving care for HIV [13, 14], We conducted data linkage of these two cohorts, which enabled us to assess the incidence of AIDS events and mortality, as well as identify any risk factors, among young people with HIV who transitioned from paediatric to adult care across clinical settings in the UK.

Methods

Study design and participants

In the UK, all children born to women with HIV, and those diagnosed with HIV aged < 16 years are reported to the National Surveillance of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood (NSHPC). They are subsequently followed through paediatric care in the Collaborative HIV Paediatric Study (CHIPS), although follow‐up ceases when they transfer to adult care [13, 15], The UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (CHIC) Study is an ongoing study collecting clinical data of adults aged ≥ 16 years accessing HIV care from some of the largest HIV clinics in the UK [14], and thus includes any young people followed in CHIPS who have transferred to one of the 25 participating adult clinics. Deaths are reported to the UK CHIC Study by participating clinics and additional mortality reports are obtained through annual linkage to national surveillance reports coordinated by Public Health England (PHE). Both CHIPS and the UK CHIC Study have NHS research ethics approval.

Statistical methods

Records of young people aged ≥ 13 years by 31 December 2015 who had received paediatric care in the UK and been followed in CHIPS were linked to their respective adult care records in UK CHIC (with data available to 31 December 2015) using deterministic data linkage. A multi‐step linkage process was used which included combinations of the following variables: date of birth, sex, Soundex (a non‐unique code derived from patient’s surname [16]), clinic identifier, clinic name and initials. Validation of linked records was conducted using additional demographic and clinical variables. As only participants with linked records and one or more completed adult care visit at a UK CHIC clinic were included in subsequent analyses, characteristics of this group were compared with young people who had transferred to adult care but who were not identified in the UK CHIC linkage, to assess representativeness. Proportions were compared using the χ2 test, and medians using the Mann–Whitney test. We used a composite endpoint of a new clinical AIDS event or death occurring after the date of the last paediatric visit, rather than a single endpoint of death, due to the reassuringly small number of deaths observed. Demographic and clinical characteristics at the last paediatric visit were compared between those with and without the composite endpoint, and causes of death, clinical and ART status at time of death were also described. Time at risk was calculated from the date of the last paediatric care visit to the date of the first new AIDS event or death, with follow‐up being right‐censored on the last date of adult follow‐up or the administrative censoring date of 31 December 2015 (whichever was earliest) for those who did not experience one of these events. The cumulative incidence per 100 person‐years of a new AIDS event or death in adult care was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. Factors associated with a new AIDS event or death were identified using Cox regression. Sex, age at HIV diagnosis in the UK, and calendar year of the last paediatric care visit were included as a priori factors in all models, regardless of statistical significance. Age at ART start and calendar year at ART start were not included in the models due to their high correlation and issues of collinearity with age at HIV diagnosis; the variables included were considered more influential on outcomes post‐transition. Other potential risk factors were identified using a stepwise backwards elimination approach with an exit probability of 0.05. Sociodemographic factors considered were ethnicity (black vs. white/other) and country of birth (UK vs. abroad). Additionally, the following indicators of clinical status at last paediatric care visit were considered: nadir CD4 and CD4 count, viral load > 400 copies/mL in the previous year, AIDS diagnosis in paediatric care, ART status, and the duration between the last paediatric and first adult visit. All analyses were carried out in STATA v.14 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Of 1683 eligible young people in CHIPS, 546 (32%) were linked to records in the UK CHIC Study, of whom 474 were confirmed in CHIPS as having transferred to adult care. Among the remaining 1137 young people with records not linked to the UK CHIC dataset, 479 were documented in CHIPS to have transferred to adult care. Characteristics of both groups are presented in Table 1. Of those with records that were linked to the UK CHIC Study, the vast majority (96.2%) had perinatally acquired HIV, half (50.8%) were female, four‐fifths (80.2%) were black and two‐thirds (60.4%) were born outside of the UK. Median (interquartile range, IQR) calendar year of birth was 1993 (1990–1995), and median age at HIV diagnosis in the UK was 6.0 (2.2–10.7) years. Almost 92% of children started ART in paediatric care, and median age at ART start was 8.8 (4.8–12.5) years.
Table 1

Demographic, antiretroviral therapy (ART) and clinical characteristics at baseline and last paediatric clinic visit by linkage status to the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (CHIC)

Total (n = 953)Linked to UK CHIC (n = 474)Not linked to UK CHIC (n = 479) P value
n (%) or median (interquartile range)
Demographic and ART baseline
Perinatally acquired HIV870 (95.9)435 (96.2)435 (95.6)0.63
Female sex503 (52.8)241 (50.8)262 (54.7)0.23
Black ethnicity738 (77.4)380 (80.2)358 (74.7)0.05
Born abroad558 (61.5)281 (60.4)293 (62.3)0.52
Calendar year of birth1994 (1991,1996)1993 (1990–1995)1995 (1992–1997)< 0.001
Age at HIV diagnosis (years)6.6 (2.5–11.0)6.0 (2.2–10.7)7.3 (3.0–11.1)0.05
Started ART in paediatric care868 (91.1)434 (91.6)434 (90.6)0.61
Combination ART regimen at ART initiation575 (60.3)270 (57.0)305 (63.7)0.04
Age at ART initiation (years)8.8 (4.7–12.6)8.8 (4.8–12.5)8.9 (4.4–12.8)0.78
Last paediatric clinic visit
Age (years)17.7 (16.8–18.5)17.7 (16.7–18.5)17.7 (16.9–18.4)0.99
Calendar year2012 (2009–2014)2011 (2008–2013)2012 (2009–2015)< 0.001
Nadir CD4 count (cells/μL)204 (98–310)200 (90–293)215 (110–326)0.05
CD4 count (cells/μL)500 (317–683)471 (280–663)528 (360–697)< 0.001
Viral load ≤ 400 copies/mL603 (64.2)278 (59.9)325 (68.4)0.007
Prior AIDS event (CDC C)247 (25.9)131 (27.6)116 (24.2)0.01
ART status
Prescribed ART852 (89.4)422 (89.0)430 (89.8)0.71
ART‐naïve/ off ART101 (10.6)52 (11.0)49 (10.6)
Duration in paediatric care (years)11.2 (6.9–15.1)12.0 (7.4–15.5)10.4 (6.4–14.8)0.01
Duration between last paediatric and first adult visits (months)Not known3.2 (1.6–6.2)Not known
Demographic, antiretroviral therapy (ART) and clinical characteristics at baseline and last paediatric clinic visit by linkage status to the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (CHIC) At the last paediatric care visit, the median age was 17.7 (16.7–18.5) years, and median calendar year was 2011 (2008–2013). Median CD4 count was 471 (280–663) cells/μL, and 59.9% overall (66% on ART) had viral load ≤ 400 copies/mL. At the last paediatric visit, a quarter (27.6%) had a prior AIDS event in paediatric care, for which the median (IQR) age at first AIDS event was 6.9 (2.6–11.5) years. Additionally, at this last paediatric visit 89.0% were prescribed ART, and of the 11% who were not on ART, 76% (39/51) were ART‐naïve. Median (IQR) duration of follow‐up in paediatric care was 12 (7–16) years, and young people had a median gap in care between their last paediatric visit and first adult visit of 3 (2–6) months. Young people with records linked to the UK CHIC Study were largely similar to young people without linked records; the key differences were that those with linked records were born in earlier calendar years and had their last paediatric clinic visit in earlier calendar years (both P < 0.001), and the median CD4 count and proportion virally suppressed at last paediatric visit were lower (P < 0.001 and P = 0.007, respectively). Of the 474 young people linked to UK CHIC, 14 were excluded as they had no subsequent visits after the first adult visit, so their time at risk could not be estimated. Of the remaining 460, 25 experienced a new AIDS event and 14 died in adult care, with 35 meeting the composite endpoint of AIDS or mortality, during a median (IQR) follow‐up in adult care of 3 (2–6) years. The AIDS events in adult care included candidiasis (n = 7, of which six were oesophageal and one unknown), herpes simplex infection (n = 1), Kaposi’s sarcoma (n = 1), Burkitt’s lymphoma (n = 1), pulmonary/disseminated tuberculosis (n = 5), Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (n = 2), pneumonia (n = 1), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (n = 1), cerebral toxoplasmosis (n = 2), HIV wasting syndrome (n = 1) and unspecified (n = 3). Of the 14 who died, four were diagnosed with a new AIDS event in adult care: one person had their first AIDS diagnosis in adult care at the time of their death, and for the other three the first AIDS event was around 1–4 years prior to death. Causes of death were advanced HIV disease (n = 3), HIV wasting (n = 1), non‐HIV/AIDS‐related (n = 1), suicide (n = 1), renal failure (n = 1), respiratory disease (n = 2), multifocal leukoencephalopathy (n = 1) and unspecified (n = 4). Nine of the 14 were female, 79% were born abroad, age at death was in the range 18–23 years, and the median (IQR) calendar year of death was 2010 (2009–2013). Deaths occurred a median of 4 (3–5) years following the last paediatric visit. At the last paediatric visit, 12 (86%) of those who died had been prescribed ART, four (29%) had a viral load ≤ 400 copies/mL and the median (IQR) CD4 count was 150 (83–383) cells/μL. By the date of the last adult care visit prior to death (with the date of last visit being the same as the date of death for 11 of the 14 who died), 10 of the 14 were being prescribed ART, and the median (IQR) CD4 count was 35 (15–200) cells/μL. The viral loads of most of the 14 young people who died were uncontrolled before, and continued to increase after, transition, although many had persistently low CD4 counts, often nearing 0 cells/μL, in adult care (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

CD4 count, log10(viral load) and age at transfer date and death among the 14 young people who died in adult care. Note that similar graphs for seven of the 14 patients who died were published in a previous paper [13]

CD4 count, log10(viral load) and age at transfer date and death among the 14 young people who died in adult care. Note that similar graphs for seven of the 14 patients who died were published in a previous paper [13]

Incidence of AIDS and mortality in adult care and associated risk factors

Overall, the crude mortality rate was 0.6/100 person‐years [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4–1.1)] and the rate of new AIDS events/mortality was 1.8 (1.3–2.5)/100 person‐years. The incidence of new AIDS events/mortality increased steadily over the first 5 years of adult care (Fig. 2) and rates were 1% (0–2%), 4% (2–6%) and 9% (6–13%) by 1, 3 and 5 years of adult follow‐up, respectively (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Cumulative incidence of AIDS/mortality in adult care.

Cumulative incidence of AIDS/mortality in adult care. Table 2 presents rates of, and factors potentially associated with, new AIDS events /mortality in adult care. In univariable analyses, rates were lower in those who transferred to adult care in later calendar years, those born in the UK, and those with a higher nadir CD4 or CD4 count at last paediatric visit. In addition, rates were higher among those with a viral load > 400 copies/mL in the last year of paediatric care and in those with an AIDS diagnosis in paediatric care. In the multivariable model, a priori factors (sex, age at HIV diagnosis, calendar year of last paediatric visit) were not associated with the outcome. Of the other potential factors, lower CD4 count at last paediatric care visit [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) (95% CI) = 0.8 (0.7–1.0)/100 cells/μL increase, P = 0.03] and an AIDS diagnosis in paediatric care [aHR = 2.7 (1.4–5.5), P = 0.004] remained significant after adjustment for other factors.
Table 2

Rates and risk factors of one or more new AIDS event or mortality in adult care

VariableNo. of eventsPerson‐years (PY)Rate per 100 PY (95% CI)Unadjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) P‐valueAdjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) P‐value
A priori
Sex
Male139251.4 (0.8–2.4)11
Female2210192.2 (1.4–3.3)1.5 (0.8–3.1)0.211.5 (0.7–3.0)0.25
Age at HIV diagnosis, per year older1.0 (1.0–1.1)0.381.0 (1.0–1.1)0.39
Calendar year of last paediatric visit, per year later0.9 (0.8–1.0)0.0020.9 (0.9–1.0)0.14
Demographic
Ethnicity
Black3115102.1 (1.4–2.9)1
White/other43951.0 (0.4–2.7)0.5(0.2–1.4)0.18
Country of birth
Abroad2711422.4 (1.6–3.4)1
UK87581.1 (0.5–2.1)0.4 (0.2–1.0)0.04
Last paediatric care visit
CD4 nadir, per 100 cells/μL increase0.8 (0.6–1.0)0.07
CD4 count, per 100 cells/μL increase0.8 (0.7–0.9)0.0020.8 (0.7–1.0)0.03
Viral load > 400 copies/mL in previous year
No875201.1 (0.5–2.2)1
Yes2711372.4 (1.6–3.6)2.2 (1.0–4.8)0.05
AIDS diagnosis in paediatric care
No1614261.1 (0.7–1.8)11
Yes195193.7 (2.3–5.7)3.3 (1.7–6.5)0.0012.7 (1.4–5.5)0.004
ART status
On ART3016581.8 (1.3–2.6)1
ART‐naïve/off ART52871.7 (0.7–4.2)1.1 (0.4–2.8)0.87
Gap between last paediatric and first adult visit, per month longer1.0 (0.98–1.01)0.72

ART, antiretroviral therapy; CI, confidence interval.

Rates and risk factors of one or more new AIDS event or mortality in adult care ART, antiretroviral therapy; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

Our study, using linked data from the CHIPS and UK CHIC Study cohorts, is one of the largest multi‐centre studies of young people with perinatal HIV transitioning from paediatric to adult care. We reported a high incidence of new AIDS events/mortality in adult care for this population. Choice of this composite endpoint enabled us to investigate associations with socio‐demographic characteristics of these young people as well as their characteristics at their last paediatric care visits. We showed that young people at greatest risk of experiencing a new AIDS event or death following transfer to adult care were those who had an AIDS diagnosis in paediatric care, or who had a lower CD4 count at their last paediatric care visit. Our findings highlight the clinical complexities of this cohort, with nearly 1 in 10 people experiencing an AIDS‐defining event or dying by 5 years’ follow‐up in adult care. Overall, 35 people in our analysis experienced a new AIDS event or died after transitioning to adult care. The mortality rate in our study, of 0.6/100 person‐years, is more than 12 times higher than the mortality rate in the general population of people aged < 25 years in the UK (0.03–0.05/100 person‐years) [17], highlighting the ongoing vulnerability of our cohort despite widespread ART access. Our rate of adverse outcomes is lower than a study of 735 young people with PHIV in New York who transitioned to adult care at a median age of 22 years [11]. In that study, the mortality rate was 5.6/100 person‐years in the first year after transition to adult care, with most deaths in the first 6 months of adult care. By contrast, most deaths in our study occurred more than 3 years after the last paediatric care visit. However, there were differences between the two studies in terms of age at transition to adult care and healthcare systems. The New York cohort transitioned at a median age of 22 years, so were older than our cohort at the time of transition to adult care. Furthermore, the New York patients who transitioned to adult care had poorer health status than those who remained in paediatric care, with paediatric care continuing to be available up to age 25 years in some settings and populations in the USA [18]. Our analysis updates a previous mortality study among young people with PHIV attending 14 clinics in England, which reported eight deaths in adult care, some of which may also be included in our findings [10], The previous study found a mortality rate in adult care of 0.5 and 0.9 for those aged 16–20 years and ≥ 21 years, respectively, similar to what we report here. In our study, the two significant predictors of AIDS and mortality in the multivariable analysis were lower CD4 count at last paediatric care visit and having had an AIDS diagnosis in paediatric care (at median age 7 years), which themselves indicate suboptimal health outcomes in paediatric care. Lower CD4 count at last paediatric care visit is an indicator of young people who struggle to manage their HIV infection, and these young people may benefit most from more intense interventions prior to and continuing into adult care. Longer‐term follow‐up is needed to evaluate mortality trends among adults with PHIV as they reach older ages. In the previous study in England [9], it was noted that all young people who died had potentially suppressive ART regimens available to them, and many had documented adherence problems in paediatric care, although in this analysis resistance data were not available. Other research suggests that HIV may contribute to neurological changes which themselves may affect outcomes such as adherence [19]. Additionally, as brain maturation completes at around 25 years of age, it may be the case that adherence improves and mortality starts to decline in young people with PHIV who survive to their mid‐20s, establish regular ART treatment habits and achieve full viral suppression [20, 21, 22]. Our study had several limitations. First, the 21 clinics that participate in the UK CHIC study include several specialized, tertiary‐care HIV clinics located in London and the south‐east of the UK, potentially limiting the generalizability of our findings to non‐tertiary‐care settings and other UK regions. We tried to address this potential bias by comparing characteristics of young people who had transitioned to adult care by whether they had been linked to the UK CHIC Study or not, and CD4 counts and viral load at transfer were, on average, poorer among those going to UK CHIC clinics. Consequently, our study may have some selection bias in favour of young people with poorer health who may have been more likely to be referred to tertiary clinics with better adolescent care provision, which may therefore result in overestimates of rates of AIDS events and mortality. Our study required young people to have at least one adult visit, and thus the design prevented us from measuring mortality in young people who transitioned to non‐UK CHIC clinics, or those who may have died before they had an adult care visit, or compare mortality with that immediately pre‐transition. We were also limited to routine clinical record data in our exploration of risk factors for AIDS and mortality. However, as suggested by Fish et al. [10], AIDS and mortality may be driven by a multitude of other factors, such as mental health and ART adherence. Additionally, our analysis was limited to factors at last paediatric care visit which were associated with AIDS/mortality, while future analyses might take a time‐updated approach to ART, viral load and CD4 measures. Further, our ART measure may have been subject to misclassification if young people being prescribed ART and therefore categorized as ‘on ART’ in our analysis were, in reality, not taking it. Lastly, given the small number of events, our multivariable model may be overfitted (five covariates in the final model) which could reduce the accuracy of the exposure estimates. However, the major strengths of our study were the relatively large sample size and the multiple clinics included. In conclusion, our study found that young people with PHIV who transitioned to adult care with poorer immunological markers and a history of more advanced disease progression were at increased risk of AIDS events and death in adult care. A majority of young people with perinatal HIV who died experienced consistently poor immunological and virological control during their paediatric and adult follow‐up. It does not appear, therefore, to be transition per se that results in poorer ART adherence, but instead a continued pattern of suboptimal adherence established in early adolescence while in paediatric care. Investment in appropriate and relevant multidisciplinary support services in paediatric and adult HIV care is essential to minimize this population’s high risk of morbidity and mortality, not to mention the potential for onward HIV transmission.
  18 in total

Review 1.  The adolescent brain.

Authors:  B J Casey; Rebecca M Jones; Todd A Hare
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  The global epidemiology of adolescents living with HIV: time for more granular data to improve adolescent health outcomes.

Authors:  Amy L Slogrove; Annette H Sohn
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.283

3.  Antiretroviral treatment of US children with perinatally acquired HIV infection: temporal changes in therapy between 1991 and 2009 and predictors of immunologic and virologic outcomes.

Authors:  Russell B Van Dyke; Kunjal Patel; George K Siberry; Sandra K Burchett; Stephen A Spector; Miriam C Chernoff; Jennifer S Read; Lynne M Mofenson; George R Seage
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.731

4.  Clinical outcomes post transition to adult services in young adults with perinatally acquired HIV infection: mortality, retention in care and viral suppression.

Authors:  Caroline Foster; Sara Ayers; Susan Mcdonald; Graham Frize; Srishti Chhabra; Thomas Joshua Pasvol; Sarah Fidler
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Mortality in perinatally HIV-infected young people in England following transition to adult care: an HIV Young Persons Network (HYPNet) audit.

Authors:  R Fish; A Judd; E Jungmann; C O'Leary; C Foster
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.180

6.  Transitioning young adults from paediatric to adult care and the HIV care continuum in Atlanta, Georgia, USA: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sophia A Hussen; Rana Chakraborty; Andrea Knezevic; Andres Camacho-Gonzalez; Eugene Huang; Rob Stephenson; Carlos Del Rio
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.396

7.  Growing up with perinatal HIV: changes in clinical outcomes before and after transfer to adult care in the UK.

Authors:  Ali Judd; Intira Jeannie Collins; Francesca Parrott; Teresa Hill; Sophie Jose; Deborah Ford; Hibo Asad; Diana M Gibb; Caroline Sabin
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 5.396

Review 8.  Accelerated aging in perinatally HIV-infected children: clinical manifestations and pathogenetic mechanisms.

Authors:  Elena Chiappini; Martina Bianconi; Annalisa Dalzini; Maria Raffaella Petrara; Luisa Galli; Carlo Giaquinto; Anita De Rossi
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 5.682

9.  Closing the gap: increases in life expectancy among treated HIV-positive individuals in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Hasina Samji; Angela Cescon; Robert S Hogg; Sharada P Modur; Keri N Althoff; Kate Buchacz; Ann N Burchell; Mardge Cohen; Kelly A Gebo; M John Gill; Amy Justice; Gregory Kirk; Marina B Klein; P Todd Korthuis; Jeff Martin; Sonia Napravnik; Sean B Rourke; Timothy R Sterling; Michael J Silverberg; Stephen Deeks; Lisa P Jacobson; Ronald J Bosch; Mari M Kitahata; James J Goedert; Richard Moore; Stephen J Gange
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  New understanding of adolescent brain development: relevance to transitional healthcare for young people with long term conditions.

Authors:  Allan Colver; Sarah Longwell
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.791

View more
  2 in total

1.  Community-based accompaniment for adolescents transitioning to adult HIV care in urban Peru: a pilot study.

Authors:  Valentina Vargas; Milagros Wong; Carly A Rodriguez; Hugo Sanchez; Jerome Galea; Alicia Ramos; Liz Senador; Lenka Kolevic; Eduardo Matos; Eduardo Sanchez; Renato A Errea; Karen Ramos; Catherine Beckhorn; Andrew Lindeborg; Carlos Benites; Leonid Lecca; Sonya Shin; Molly F Franke
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 2.  [HIV infection and exposure in children and adolescents].

Authors:  Ulrich Baumann; Ulf Schulze Sturm; Christoph Königs
Journal:  Monatsschr Kinderheilkd       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 0.416

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.