Literature DB >> 33939387

Anorectal Mucosal Melanoma in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition: Should We Change Our Surgical Management Paradigm?

Mohammad Adileh1, Jonathan B Yuval, Shan Huang, Alexander N Shoushtari, Felipe Quezada-Diaz, Emmanouil P Pappou, Martin R Weiser, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, J Joshua Smith, Philip B Paty, Garrett M Nash.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition therapy has dramatically improved survival in patients with skin melanoma. Survival outcomes after resection of anorectal melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibition have not been reported.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare survival outcomes following surgical resection of anorectal melanoma between patients who received immune checkpoint inhibition and patients who did not.
DESIGN: This study is a retrospective analysis of data from a prospectively maintained database.
SETTING: This study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent surgery for anorectal melanoma between 2006 and 2017 were included. They were stratified according to the use of immune checkpoint inhibition. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were overall and disease-specific survival.
RESULTS: Of the 47 patients included in the analysis, 29 (62%) received immune checkpoint inhibition therapy. Twenty-two (76%) of the 29 patients received immune checkpoint inhibition after detection of metastasis or disease progression rather than in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. Overall survival did not differ significantly between patients who received immune checkpoint inhibition therapy and patients who did not (median, 52 and 20 months; 5-year rate, 41% vs 35%; p = 0.25). Disease-specific survival also did not differ significantly. Our analysis did not identify any clinical or pathological features associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibition therapy or with survival. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its relatively small sample and retrospective design and by the heterogeneous treatment regimen in the immune checkpoint inhibition group.
CONCLUSIONS: Immune checkpoint inhibition therapy by itself does not appear to improve survival in patients who undergo resection or excision of anorectal melanoma. Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibition with other therapeutic modalities warrant further investigation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B499. MELANOMA DE LA MUCOSA ANORRECTAL EN LA ERA DE LOS INHIBIDORES DEL PUNTO DE CONTROL INMUNOLÓGICO: ¿DEBEMOS DE CAMBIAR NUESTRO PARADIGMA DEL MANEJO QUIRÚRGICO: El advenimiento de la terapia de los inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico, han mejorado dramáticamente la supervivencia en pacientes con melanoma de piel. No se han informado los resultados de supervivencia después de la resección del melanoma anorrectal, tratado con inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico.Comparar los resultados de supervivencia después de la resección quirúrgica de melanoma anorrectal entre pacientes que recibieron y no recibieron inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico.Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente.Centro oncológico integral.Pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía por melanoma anorrectal entre 2006 y 2017. Los pacientes fueron estratificados según el uso de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico.Supervivencia global y específica de la enfermedad.De los 47 pacientes incluidos en el análisis, 29 (62%) recibieron terapia de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico. Veintidós (76%) de los 29 pacientes recibieron inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico después de la detección de metástasis o progresión de la enfermedad, en vez de administración adyuvante o neoadyuvante. La supervivencia global no varió significativamente entre los pacientes que recibieron o no recibieron terapia de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico (mediana, 52 y 20 meses, respectivamente; tasa a 5 años, 41% frente a 35%, respectivamente; p = 0,25). La supervivencia específica de la enfermedad tampoco varió significativamente. Nuestro análisis no identificó ninguna característica clínica o patológica, asociada con la respuesta a la terapia de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico o con la supervivencia.Muestra relativamente pequeña y diseño retrospectivo. Régimen de tratamiento heterogéneo en el grupo de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico.La terapia por sí sola, de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico, no parece mejorar la supervivencia en pacientes que se someten a resección o escisión de melanoma anorrectal. Las combinaciones de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico con otras modalidades terapéuticas, merecen una mayor investigación. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B499. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33939387      PMCID: PMC8097722          DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  37 in total

Review 1.  Malignant tumors of the anal canal: the spectrum of disease, treatment, and outcomes.

Authors:  J V Klas; D A Rothenberger; W D Wong; R D Madoff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  F Stephen Hodi; Steven J O'Day; David F McDermott; Robert W Weber; Jeffrey A Sosman; John B Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia M Vaubel; Gerald P Linette; David Hogg; Christian H Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbé; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I Clark; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason Tian; Michael J Yellin; Geoffrey M Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J Urba
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Abdominoperineal resection provides better local control but equivalent overall survival to local excision of anorectal malignant melanoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Akihisa Matsuda; Masao Miyashita; Satoshi Matsumoto; Goro Takahashi; Takeshi Matsutani; Takeshi Yamada; Taro Kishi; Eiji Uchida
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Malignant melanoma of the skin of the head and neck. An analysis of 405 cases.

Authors:  A J Ballantyne
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Treatment Strategies and Survival Trends for Anorectal Melanoma: Is it Time for a Change?

Authors:  James P Taylor; Miloslawa Stem; David Yu; Sophia Y Chen; Sandy H Fang; Susan L Gearhart; Bashar Safar; Jonathan E Efron
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Association of Pembrolizumab With Tumor Response and Survival Among Patients With Advanced Melanoma.

Authors:  Antoni Ribas; Omid Hamid; Adil Daud; F Stephen Hodi; Jedd D Wolchok; Richard Kefford; Anthony M Joshua; Amita Patnaik; Wen-Jen Hwu; Jeffrey S Weber; Tara C Gangadhar; Peter Hersey; Roxana Dronca; Richard W Joseph; Hassane Zarour; Bartosz Chmielowski; Donald P Lawrence; Alain Algazi; Naiyer A Rizvi; Brianna Hoffner; Christine Mateus; Kevin Gergich; Jill A Lindia; Maxine Giannotti; Xiaoyun Nicole Li; Scot Ebbinghaus; S Peter Kang; Caroline Robert
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Anorectal melanoma. A 64-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Authors:  M S Brady; J P Kavolius; S H Quan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Ipilimumab in Previously Untreated, Unresectable Stage IIIB-IV Melanoma.

Authors:  Igor Puzanov; Mohammed M Milhem; David Minor; Omid Hamid; Ai Li; Lisa Chen; Michael Chastain; Kevin S Gorski; Abraham Anderson; Jeffrey Chou; Howard L Kaufman; Robert H I Andtbacka
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Ipilimumab Versus Ipilimumab Alone in Patients With Advanced, Unresectable Melanoma.

Authors:  Jason Chesney; Igor Puzanov; Frances Collichio; Parminder Singh; Mohammed M Milhem; John Glaspy; Omid Hamid; Merrick Ross; Philip Friedlander; Claus Garbe; Theodore F Logan; Axel Hauschild; Celeste Lebbé; Lisa Chen; Jenny J Kim; Jennifer Gansert; Robert H I Andtbacka; Howard L Kaufman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Anal melanoma: Outcomes of current surgical approaches.

Authors:  S Kaya; M Kement; Y E Altuntas; O Altin; A Seker; S Mazmanoglu; L Kaptanoglu; N Bildik; H F Kucuk
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.968

View more
  1 in total

1.  Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in 47 patients with primary anorectal malignant melanoma in the immune therapy era.

Authors:  Dai Ogata; Keita Tsutsui; Kenjiro Namikawa; Konosuke Moritani; Kenta Nakama; Shunichi Jinnai; Akira Takahashi; Shunsuke Tsukamoto; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Naoya Yamazaki
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.553

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.