| Literature DB >> 33939234 |
Ping Jiang1,2,3, Jiayu Sun4, Xiaobo Zhou5, Lu Lu1,2,3, Lei Li1,2,3, Xiaoqi Huang1,2,3, Jing Li6, Keith Kendrick7, Qiyong Gong1,2,3.
Abstract
Anxiety and depression are the most common withdrawal symptoms of methamphetamine (METH) abuse, which further exacerbate relapse of METH abuse. To date, no effective pharmacotherapy exists for METH abuse and its withdrawal symptoms. Therefore, understanding the neuromechanism underlying METH abuse and its withdrawal symptoms is essential for developing clinical strategies and improving patient care. The aims of this study were to investigate brain network abnormalities in METH abusers (MAs) and their associations with affective symptoms. Forty-eight male abstinent MAs and 48 age-gender matched healthy controls were recruited and underwent resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The severity of patient anxiety and depressive symptoms were measured by Hamilton anxiety and depression rating scales, which decreased across the duration of abstinence. Independent component analysis was used to investigate the brain network functional connectivity (FC) properties. Compared with healthy controls, MAs demonstrated hypo-intra-network FC in the cerebellar network and hyper-intra-network FC in the posterior salience network. A whole-brain regression analysis revealed that FC strength of clusters located in the right rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) within the ventromedial network (VMN) was associated with affective symptoms in the patients. Importantly, the intra-network FC strength of the rACC in VMN mediated the association between abstinence duration and the severity level of affective symptoms. Our results demonstrate alterations in brain functional networks underlying METH abuse, and that the FC of rACC within VMN serve as a neural substrate in the association between abstinence length and affective symptom severity in the MAs.Entities:
Keywords: Methamphetamine; anxiety; depressive symptoms; functional connectivity; psychoradiology; resting state fMRI
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33939234 PMCID: PMC8249885 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Brain Mapp ISSN: 1065-9471 Impact factor: 5.038
Demographic information of the MA and HC groups
| MA ( | HC ( | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Age (years) (± | 28.77 ± 7.66 | 28.77 ± 10.08 |
| Education (years) (± | 8.27 ± 3.68 | 11.96 ± 2.96 |
|
| ||
| HAMA scores (± | 3.56 ± 5.09 | – |
| HAMD scores (± | 4.90 ± 5.25 | – |
|
| ||
| Abstinence (days) (± | 114.56 ± 116.20 (12–400) | – |
| Use duration (months) (± | 47.74 ± 39.62 | – |
| Mean dose (g/time) (± | 0.39 ± 0.30 | – |
| Total amount (kg) (± | 1.05 ± 2.10 | – |
| Age of first use (years) (± | 24.66 ± 8.20 | – |
Abbreviation: g, gram; HAMA, Hamilton anxiety rating scale; HAMD, Hamilton depression rating scale; HC, healthy control; kg, kilogram; MA: methamphetamine abuser; METH: methamphetamine; SD, standard deviation.
N = 47.
p < .001.
FIGURE 1Group differences in brain network FC using age and education years as covariates. Compared with HC, the MA group demonstrated a significantly higher intra‐network FC for the posterior cingulate cortex in the posterior salience network (a) and a lower intra‐network FC for the cerebellum in the cerebellar network (b). The graphs illustrate the standard residual value of intra‐network FC (z scores) after regressing out age and education years as covariates. FC, functional connectivity; HC, healthy control; MA, methamphetamine abuser; R, right. **p < .01; ***p < .001
Clusters demonstrate significant group differences and association with affective symptoms in intra‐network FC in the MAs
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak voxel | |||||
| Brain networks | Regions | Vox | x | y | z |
|
| |||||
| Posterior salience network |
| 16 | 10 | −34 | 50 |
|
| |||||
| Cerebellar network | |||||
| Cluster 1 |
| 152 | 18 | −62 | −38 |
| Cluster 2 |
| 51 | 30 | −36 | −32 |
| Cluster 3 |
| 42 | 6 | −45 | −18 |
Note: The MNI coordinates of the peak voxel and number of voxels in the cluster are reported to express group differences in intra‐network FC and significant associations between intra‐network FC and affective symptoms in the MAs. The brain area corresponding to peak voxel is in bold and the anatomical areas included in the cluster are written in regular font. The clusters were FWE corrected and thresholded at p < .05 with larger than 10 contiguous voxels.
Abbreviations: ACC, anterior cingulate gyrus; FC, functional connectivity; FP, frontal pole; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; MA, methamphetamine abuser; medPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; ParaCG, paracingulate gyrus; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; VMN, ventromedial network; Vox, number of voxels; WM, white matter.
FIGURE 2Intra‐network and between‐network FC showing significant correlations with affective symptoms in the MAs. The figures and graphs demonstrate significant correlations between (a) HAMA, (b) HAMD scores and the intra‐network FC of clusters within VMN; (c) one of the five clusters in the VMN showing significant correlation with PCA1 value; (d) significant correlation between HAMA scores and coupling between auditory and VMN networks. Aud, auditory network; medPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; rACC, rostral anterior cingulate cortex; VMN, ventromedial network; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; PCA1, the first component of principle component analysis; R, right. *p < .05; **p < .01
FIGURE 3The FC for rACC within the VMN significantly mediated the association between abstinence duration and affective symptoms after controlling for age and years of education in the MAs. The FC of right rACC in the VMN (mediator) mediates the association between abstinence duration (IV) and HAMA scores (DV) and PCA1 value (DV). rACC, rostral anterior cingulate cortex; VMN, ventromedial network; AbsDay, abstinence days; FC, functional connectivity; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; METH, methamphetamine; PCA1, the first component of principle component analysis; DV, dependent variable; IV, independent variable