Pritesh R Mutha1,2, Matthew Fasullo3, Shijian Chu4, Mitchell L Schubert5,3, Alvin Zfass5,3, Patricia Cooper5, Mankanchan Gill5, Le Kang6, Michael Vaezi7, Stu Wildhorn8, Chris Slaughter9, Tilak Shah5,3. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Hunter Holmes McGuire Richmond VA Medical Center, Gastroenterology # 111N, Richmond, VA, 23249, USA. Pritesh.Mutha@va.gov. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Pritesh.Mutha@va.gov. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. 4. Division of Mathematics, General and Health Sciences, John Tyler Community College, Chester, VA, USA. 5. Division of Gastroenterology, Hunter Holmes McGuire Richmond VA Medical Center, Gastroenterology # 111N, Richmond, VA, 23249, USA. 6. Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. 7. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. 8. Diversatek Healthcare, Highlands Ranch, CO, USA. 9. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Epithelial barrier function (EBF) disruption is a key mechanism underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our aim was to assess whether two novel technologies, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and mucosal integrity testing (MIT), could assess EBF. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing upper endoscopy for refractory GERD or non-GERD conditions. Patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, pCLE, MIT, esophageal biopsy at 2 cm and 6 cm above the esophagogastric junction, and wireless pH testing. To assess EBF in vitro, biopsies were mounted in a mini-Ussing chamber, 1 ml of fluorescein was instilled on the mucosal side, and concentration of fluorescein on the serosal side was measured at 3 h. RESULTS: We enrolled 54 subjects (28 GERD, 26 non-GERD based on Lyon consensus criteria). In vivo permeability assessed by pCLE did not differ significantly between GERD vs. non-GERD patients and did not correlate with in vitro permeability. Mean MIT at 2 cm was lower in GERD compared to non-GERD (1914 vs. 3727 ohms). MIT correlated inversely with in vitro permeability at 2 cm and at 6 cm. Using a predictive model that used slope and intercept of MIT at 2 cm and 6 cm, sensitivity and specificity of MIT at identifying GERD was 76% and 72%, respectively. CONCLUSION: pCLE did not differentiate GERD vs non-GERD and did not correlate with EBF measured in vitro. MIT, on the other hand, may be more promising as it differentiated GERD vs non-GERD and correlated with EBF measured in vitro.
INTRODUCTION: Epithelial barrier function (EBF) disruption is a key mechanism underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our aim was to assess whether two novel technologies, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and mucosal integrity testing (MIT), could assess EBF. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing upper endoscopy for refractory GERD or non-GERD conditions. Patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, pCLE, MIT, esophageal biopsy at 2 cm and 6 cm above the esophagogastric junction, and wireless pH testing. To assess EBF in vitro, biopsies were mounted in a mini-Ussing chamber, 1 ml of fluorescein was instilled on the mucosal side, and concentration of fluorescein on the serosal side was measured at 3 h. RESULTS: We enrolled 54 subjects (28 GERD, 26 non-GERD based on Lyon consensus criteria). In vivo permeability assessed by pCLE did not differ significantly between GERD vs. non-GERD patients and did not correlate with in vitro permeability. Mean MIT at 2 cm was lower in GERD compared to non-GERD (1914 vs. 3727 ohms). MIT correlated inversely with in vitro permeability at 2 cm and at 6 cm. Using a predictive model that used slope and intercept of MIT at 2 cm and 6 cm, sensitivity and specificity of MIT at identifying GERD was 76% and 72%, respectively. CONCLUSION: pCLE did not differentiate GERD vs non-GERD and did not correlate with EBF measured in vitro. MIT, on the other hand, may be more promising as it differentiated GERD vs non-GERD and correlated with EBF measured in vitro.