Gabrielle F Miller1, Bradford Greening, Ketra L Rice, Aziza Arifkhanova, Martin I Meltzer, Fátima Coronado. 1. Division of Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (Drs Miller and Rice), Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging & Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (Drs Greening Jr and Meltzer), Policy Research, Analysis, and Development Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (Dr Arifkhanova), and Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention & Health Promotion (Dr Coronado), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schools are an integral part of the community; however, congregate settings facilitate transmission of SARS-CoV-2, presenting a challenge to school administrators to provide a safe, in-school environment for students and staff. METHODS: We adapted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's COVIDTracer Advanced tool to model the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a school of 596 individuals. We estimate possible reductions in cases and hospitalizations among this population using a scenario-based analysis that accounts for (a) the risk of importation of infection from the community; (b) adherence to key Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended mitigation strategies: mask wearing, cleaning and disinfection, hand hygiene, and social distancing; and (c) the effectiveness of contact tracing interventions at limiting onward transmission. RESULTS: Low impact and effectiveness of mitigation strategies (net effectiveness: 27%) result in approximately 40% of exposed staff and students becoming COVID-19 cases. When the net effectiveness of mitigation strategies was 69% or greater, in-school transmission was mostly prevented, yet importation of cases from the surrounding community could result in nearly 20% of the school's population becoming infected within 180 days. The combined effects of mitigation strategies and contact tracing were able to prevent most onward transmission. Hospitalizations were low among children and adults (<0.5% of the school population) across all scenarios examined. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our model, layering mitigation strategies and contact tracing can limit the number of cases that may occur from transmission in schools. Schools in communities with substantial levels of community spread will need to be more vigilant to ensure adherence of mitigation strategies to minimize transmission. Our results show that for school administrators, teachers, and parents to provide the safest environment, it is important to utilize multiple mitigation strategies and contract tracing that reduce SARS CoV-2 transmission by at least 69%. This will require training, reinforcement, and vigilance to ensure that the highest level of adherence is maintained over the entire school term.
BACKGROUND: Schools are an integral part of the community; however, congregate settings facilitate transmission of SARS-CoV-2, presenting a challenge to school administrators to provide a safe, in-school environment for students and staff. METHODS: We adapted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's COVIDTracer Advanced tool to model the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a school of 596 individuals. We estimate possible reductions in cases and hospitalizations among this population using a scenario-based analysis that accounts for (a) the risk of importation of infection from the community; (b) adherence to key Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended mitigation strategies: mask wearing, cleaning and disinfection, hand hygiene, and social distancing; and (c) the effectiveness of contact tracing interventions at limiting onward transmission. RESULTS: Low impact and effectiveness of mitigation strategies (net effectiveness: 27%) result in approximately 40% of exposed staff and students becoming COVID-19 cases. When the net effectiveness of mitigation strategies was 69% or greater, in-school transmission was mostly prevented, yet importation of cases from the surrounding community could result in nearly 20% of the school's population becoming infected within 180 days. The combined effects of mitigation strategies and contact tracing were able to prevent most onward transmission. Hospitalizations were low among children and adults (<0.5% of the school population) across all scenarios examined. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our model, layering mitigation strategies and contact tracing can limit the number of cases that may occur from transmission in schools. Schools in communities with substantial levels of community spread will need to be more vigilant to ensure adherence of mitigation strategies to minimize transmission. Our results show that for school administrators, teachers, and parents to provide the safest environment, it is important to utilize multiple mitigation strategies and contract tracing that reduce SARS CoV-2 transmission by at least 69%. This will require training, reinforcement, and vigilance to ensure that the highest level of adherence is maintained over the entire school term.
Authors: Kanecia O Zimmerman; Ibukunoluwa C Akinboyo; M Alan Brookhart; Angelique E Boutzoukas; Kathleen A McGann; Michael J Smith; Gabriela Maradiaga Panayotti; Sarah C Armstrong; Helen Bristow; Donna Parker; Sabrina Zadrozny; David J Weber; Daniel K Benjamin Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 9.703
Authors: Sean L Wu; Andrew N Mertens; Yoshika S Crider; Anna Nguyen; Nolan N Pokpongkiat; Stephanie Djajadi; Anmol Seth; Michelle S Hsiang; John M Colford; Art Reingold; Benjamin F Arnold; Alan Hubbard; Jade Benjamin-Chung Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Brian Pavilonis; A Michael Ierardi; Leon Levine; Franklin Mirer; Elizabeth A Kelvin Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Sara E Oliver; Julia W Gargano; Mona Marin; Megan Wallace; Kathryn G Curran; Mary Chamberland; Nancy McClung; Doug Campos-Outcalt; Rebecca L Morgan; Sarah Mbaeyi; José R Romero; H Keipp Talbot; Grace M Lee; Beth P Bell; Kathleen Dooling Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Thomas N Denny; Laura Andrews; Mattia Bonsignori; Kyle Cavanaugh; Michael B Datto; Anastasia Deckard; C Todd DeMarco; Nicole DeNaeyer; Carol A Epling; Thaddeus Gurley; Steven B Haase; Chloe Hallberg; John Harer; Charles L Kneifel; Mark J Lee; Raul Louzao; M Anthony Moody; Zack Moore; Christopher R Polage; Jamie Puglin; P Hunter Spotts; John A Vaughn; Cameron R Wolfe Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: R Ryan Lash; Catherine V Donovan; Aaron T Fleischauer; Zack S Moore; Gibbie Harris; Susan Hayes; Meg Sullivan; April Wilburn; Jonathan Ong; Dana Wright; Raynard Washington; Amy Pulliam; Brittany Byers; Heather P McLaughlin; Emilio Dirlikov; Dale A Rose; Henry T Walke; Margaret A Honein; Patrick K Moonan; John E Oeltmann Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Shari Krishnaratne; Hannah Littlecott; Kerstin Sell; Jacob Burns; Julia E Rabe; Jan M Stratil; Tim Litwin; Clemens Kreutz; Michaela Coenen; Karin Geffert; Anna Helen Boger; Ani Movsisyan; Suzie Kratzer; Carmen Klinger; Katharina Wabnitz; Brigitte Strahwald; Ben Verboom; Eva Rehfuess; Renke L Biallas; Caroline Jung-Sievers; Stephan Voss; Lisa M Pfadenhauer Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-01-17
Authors: Brian J Schimmoller; Nídia S Trovão; Molly Isbell; Chirag Goel; Benjamin F Heck; Tenley C Archer; Klint D Cardinal; Neil B Naik; Som Dutta; Ahleah Rohr Daniel; Afshin Beheshti Journal: medRxiv Date: 2022-03-16
Authors: Brian J Schimmoller; Nídia S Trovão; Molly Isbell; Chirag Goel; Benjamin F Heck; Tenley C Archer; Klint D Cardinal; Neil B Naik; Som Dutta; Ahleah Rohr Daniel; Afshin Beheshti Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2022-09-30 Impact factor: 14.957