Paras Lakhani 1 , Adam Flanders 1 , Richard Gorniak 1 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of deep learning in assessing endotracheal tube (ETT) position on radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 22 960 de-identified frontal chest radiographs from 11 153 patients (average age, 60.2 years ± 19.9 [standard deviation], 55.6% men) between 2010 and 2018 containing an ETT were placed into 12 categories, including bronchial insertion and distance from the carina at 1.0-cm intervals (0.0-0.9 cm, 1.0-1.9 cm, etc), and greater than 10 cm. Images were split into training (80%, 18 368 images), validation (10%, 2296 images), and internal test (10%, 2296 images), derived from the same institution as the training data. One hundred external test radiographs were also obtained from a different hospital. The Inception V3 deep neural network was used to predict ETT-carina distance. ETT-carina distances and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the radiologists and artificial intelligence (AI) system were calculated on a subset of 100 random internal and 100 external test images. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for low and high ETT position thresholds. RESULTS: On the internal and external test images, respectively, the ICCs of AI and radiologists were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.92) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.94); the ICCs of the radiologists were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.95) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.90). The AI model was 93.9% sensitive (95% CI: 90.0, 96.7) and 97.7% specific (95% CI: 96.9, 98.3) for detecting ETT-carina distance less than 1 cm. CONCLUSION: Deep learning predicted ETT-carina distance within 1 cm in most cases and showed excellent interrater agreement compared with radiologists. The model was sensitive and specific in detecting low ETT positions.© RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of deep learning in assessing endotracheal tube (ETT) position on radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 22 960 de-identified frontal chest radiographs from 11 153 patients (average age, 60.2 years ± 19.9 [standard deviation], 55.6% men) between 2010 and 2018 containing an ETT were placed into 12 categories, including bronchial insertion and distance from the carina at 1.0-cm intervals (0.0-0.9 cm, 1.0-1.9 cm, etc), and greater than 10 cm. Images were split into training (80%, 18 368 images), validation (10%, 2296 images), and internal test (10%, 2296 images), derived from the same institution as the training data. One hundred external test radiographs were also obtained from a different hospital. The Inception V3 deep neural network was used to predict ETT-carina distance. ETT-carina distances and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the radiologists and artificial intelligence (AI) system were calculated on a subset of 100 random internal and 100 external test images. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for low and high ETT position thresholds. RESULTS: On the internal and external test images, respectively, the ICCs of AI and radiologists were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.92) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.94); the ICCs of the radiologists were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.95) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.90). The AI model was 93.9% sensitive (95% CI: 90.0, 96.7) and 97.7% specific (95% CI: 96.9, 98.3) for detecting ETT-carina distance less than 1 cm. CONCLUSION: Deep learning predicted ETT-carina distance within 1 cm in most cases and showed excellent interrater agreement compared with radiologists. The model was sensitive and specific in detecting low ETT positions.© RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
Entities: Chemical
Year: 2020
PMID： 33937852 PMCID： PMC8082365 DOI： 10.1148/ryai.2020200026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Artif Intell ISSN： 2638-6100