Literature DB >> 33937851

Deep Learning-based Automated Segmentation of Left Ventricular Trabeculations and Myocardium on Cardiac MR Images: A Feasibility Study.

Axel Bartoli1, Joris Fournel1, Zakarya Bentatou1, Gilbert Habib1, Alain Lalande1, Monique Bernard1, Loïc Boussel1, François Pontana1, Jean-Nicolas Dacher1, Badih Ghattas1, Alexis Jacquier1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a complete deep learning pipeline that allows fully automated end-diastolic left ventricle (LV) cardiac MRI segmentation, including trabeculations and automatic quality control of the predicted segmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study includes training, validation, and testing datasets of 272, 27, and 150 cardiac MR images, respectively, collected between 2012 and 2018. The reference standard was the manual segmentation of four LV anatomic structures performed on end-diastolic short-axis cine cardiac MRI: LV trabeculations, LV myocardium, LV papillary muscles, and the LV blood cavity. The automatic pipeline was composed of five steps with a DenseNet architecture. Intraobserver agreement, interobserver agreement, and interaction time were recorded. The analysis includes the correlation between the manual and automated segmentation, a reproducibility comparison, and Bland-Altman plots.
RESULTS: The automated method achieved mean Dice coefficients of 0.96 ± 0.01 (standard deviation) for LV blood cavity, 0.89 ± 0.03 for LV myocardium, and 0.62 ± 0.08 for LV trabeculation (mean absolute error, 3.63 g ± 3.4). Automatic quantification of LV end-diastolic volume, LV myocardium mass, LV trabeculation, and trabeculation mass-to-total myocardial mass (TMM) ratio showed a significant correlation with the manual measures (r = 0.99, 0.99, 0.90, and 0.83, respectively; all P < .01). On a subset of 48 patients, the mean Dice value for LV trabeculation was 0.63 ± 0.10 or higher compared with the human interobserver (0.44 ± 0.09; P < .01) and intraobserver measures (0.58 ± 0.09; P < .01). Automatic quantification of the trabeculation mass-to-TMM ratio had a higher correlation (0.92) compared with the intra- and interobserver measures (0.74 and 0.39, respectively; both P < .01).
CONCLUSION: Automated deep learning framework can achieve reproducible and quality-controlled segmentation of cardiac trabeculations, outperforming inter- and intraobserver analyses.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33937851      PMCID: PMC8082330          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020200021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  32 in total

1.  Left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction, cardiac phenotype, and neuromuscular disorders.

Authors:  C Stöllberger; C Wegner; J Finsterer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Thijs Kooi; Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Francesco Ciompi; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Fully convolutional multi-scale residual DenseNets for cardiac segmentation and automated cardiac diagnosis using ensemble of classifiers.

Authors:  Mahendra Khened; Varghese Alex Kollerathu; Ganapathy Krishnamurthi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Correlation of trabeculae and papillary muscles with clinical and cardiac characteristics and impact on CMR measures of LV anatomy and function.

Authors:  Michael L Chuang; Philimon Gona; Gilion L T F Hautvast; Carol J Salton; Susan J Blease; Susan B Yeon; Marcel Breeuwer; Christopher J O'Donnell; Warren J Manning
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-11

5.  Assessing Radiology Research on Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Guide for Authors, Reviewers, and Readers-From the Radiology Editorial Board.

Authors:  David A Bluemke; Linda Moy; Miriam A Bredella; Birgit B Ertl-Wagner; Kathryn J Fowler; Vicky J Goh; Elkan F Halpern; Christopher P Hess; Mark L Schiebler; Clifford R Weiss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Left ventricular noncompaction: a distinct cardiomyopathy or a trait shared by different cardiac diseases?

Authors:  Eloisa Arbustini; Frank Weidemann; Jennifer L Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Diagnosis of left-ventricular non-compaction in patients with left-ventricular systolic dysfunction: time for a reappraisal of diagnostic criteria?

Authors:  Sanjay K Kohli; Antonios A Pantazis; Jaymin S Shah; Benjamin Adeyemi; Gordon Jackson; William J McKenna; Sanjay Sharma; Perry M Elliott
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the European Society Of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases.

Authors:  Perry Elliott; Bert Andersson; Eloisa Arbustini; Zofia Bilinska; Franco Cecchi; Philippe Charron; Olivier Dubourg; Uwe Kühl; Bernhard Maisch; William J McKenna; Lorenzo Monserrat; Sabine Pankuweit; Claudio Rapezzi; Petar Seferovic; Luigi Tavazzi; Andre Keren
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Semi-automatic detection of myocardial trabeculation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: correlation with histology and reproducibility in a mouse model of non-compaction.

Authors:  Julien Frandon; Stéphanie Bricq; Zakarya Bentatou; Laetitia Marcadet; Pierre Antoine Barral; Mathieu Finas; Daniel Fagret; Frank Kober; Gilbert Habib; Monique Bernard; Alain Lalande; Lucile Miquerol; Alexis Jacquier
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Quantification of left ventricular trabeculae using fractal analysis.

Authors:  Gabriella Captur; Vivek Muthurangu; Christopher Cook; Andrew S Flett; Robert Wilson; Andrea Barison; Daniel M Sado; Sarah Anderson; William J McKenna; Timothy J Mohun; Perry M Elliott; James C Moon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fully automated intracardiac 4D flow MRI post-processing using deep learning for biventricular segmentation.

Authors:  Philip A Corrado; Andrew L Wentland; Jitka Starekova; Archana Dhyani; Kara N Goss; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 7.034

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.