Literature DB >> 33937839

Fully Automated Segmentation of Head CT Neuroanatomy Using Deep Learning.

Jason C Cai1, Zeynettin Akkus1, Kenneth A Philbrick1, Arunnit Boonrod1, Safa Hoodeshenas1, Alexander D Weston1, Pouria Rouzrokh1, Gian Marco Conte1, Atefeh Zeinoddini1, David C Vogelsang1, Qiao Huang1, Bradley J Erickson1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning model that segments intracranial structures on head CT scans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a primary dataset containing 62 normal noncontrast head CT scans from 62 patients (mean age, 73 years; age range, 27-95 years) acquired between August and December 2018 was used for model development. Eleven intracranial structures were manually annotated on the axial oblique series. The dataset was split into 40 scans for training, 10 for validation, and 12 for testing. After initial training, eight model configurations were evaluated on the validation dataset and the highest performing model was evaluated on the test dataset. Interobserver variability was reported using multirater consensus labels obtained from the test dataset. To ensure that the model learned generalizable features, it was further evaluated on two secondary datasets containing 12 volumes with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) and 30 normal volumes from a publicly available source. Statistical significance was determined using categorical linear regression with P < .05.
RESULTS: Overall Dice coefficient on the primary test dataset was 0.84 ± 0.05 (standard deviation). Performance ranged from 0.96 ± 0.01 (brainstem and cerebrum) to 0.74 ± 0.06 (internal capsule). Dice coefficients were comparable to expert annotations and exceeded those of existing segmentation methods. The model remained robust on external CT scans and scans demonstrating ventricular enlargement. The use of within-network normalization and class weighting facilitated learning of underrepresented classes.
CONCLUSION: Automated segmentation of CT neuroanatomy is feasible with a high degree of accuracy. The model generalized to external CT scans as well as scans demonstrating iNPH.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33937839      PMCID: PMC8082409          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020190183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  18 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Norman Relkin; Anthony Marmarou; Petra Klinge; Marvin Bergsneider; Peter McL Black
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Automated Measurement of Cerebral Atrophy and Outcome in Endovascular Thrombectomy.

Authors:  William K Diprose; James P Diprose; Michael T M Wang; Gregory P Tarr; Andrew McFetridge; P Alan Barber
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Radial width of the temporal horn: a sensitive measure in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Giovanni B Frisoni; Cristina Geroldi; Alberto Beltramello; Angelo Bianchetti; Giuliano Binetti; Giovanni Bordiga; Charles DeCarli; Mikko P Laakso; Hilkka Soininen; Cristina Testa; Orazio Zanetti; Marco Trabucchi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Automatic segmentation of head and neck CT images for radiotherapy treatment planning using multiple atlases, statistical appearance models, and geodesic active contours.

Authors:  Karl D Fritscher; Marta Peroni; Paolo Zaffino; Maria Francesca Spadea; Rainer Schubert; Gregory Sharp
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS Study Group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score.

Authors:  P A Barber; A M Demchuk; J Zhang; A M Buchan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Volumetric measurements in the detection of reduced ventricular volume in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus whose clinical condition improved after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.

Authors:  Richard C Anderson; Jessica J Grant; Robert de la Paz; Steven Frucht; Robert R Goodman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Hybrid 3D/2D Convolutional Neural Network for Hemorrhage Evaluation on Head CT.

Authors:  P D Chang; E Kuoy; J Grinband; B D Weinberg; M Thompson; R Homo; J Chen; H Abcede; M Shafie; L Sugrue; C G Filippi; M-Y Su; W Yu; C Hess; D Chow
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  MRI segmentation of the human brain: challenges, methods, and applications.

Authors:  Ivana Despotović; Bart Goossens; Wilfried Philips
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 9.  Deep Learning for Brain MRI Segmentation: State of the Art and Future Directions.

Authors:  Zeynettin Akkus; Alfiia Galimzianova; Assaf Hoogi; Daniel L Rubin; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Brain Segmentation From Computed Tomography of Healthy Aging and Geriatric Concussion at Variable Spatial Resolutions.

Authors:  Andrei Irimia; Alexander S Maher; Kenneth A Rostowsky; Nahian F Chowdhury; Darryl H Hwang; E Meng Law
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.081

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning in neuroimaging: from research to clinical practice.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Nenning; Georg Langs
Journal:  Radiologie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-08-31

2.  Deep learning-based automated segmentation of eight brain anatomical regions using head CT images in PET/CT.

Authors:  Tong Wang; Haiqun Xing; Yige Li; Sicong Wang; Ling Liu; Fang Li; Hongli Jing
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.795

Review 3.  Head CT: Toward Making Full Use of the Information the X-Rays Give.

Authors:  K A Cauley; Y Hu; S W Fielden
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.966

4.  Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks.

Authors:  Jonathan Zopes; Moritz Platscher; Silvio Paganucci; Christian Federau
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.