BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Atrophy in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures depicted with brain imaging is one of the most accurate markers of Alzheimer disease (AD), but practical considerations have thus far limited their routine clinical use. The aim of this study was to explore the validity of a CT- and MR-based measure of MTL atrophy that would be feasible for routine clinical use. METHODS: We acquired brain CT scans in the temporal lobe plane with thin sections in 42 patients with AD and in 29 control patients without dementia. We also acquired MR images (according to a 3D magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo protocol) in 28 patients with AD and in 28 control subjects without dementia. The radial width of the temporal horn (rWTH) of the lateral ventricle was measured with a precision caliper at the tip of the horn on CT scans or high-quality MR images. The validity of the rWTH variable was assessed by test-retest and interrater reliability, convergent and discriminant validity compared with progressively distant brain regions, and known-group validity (accuracy of the separation of patients with AD from control subjects). Convergent and discriminant validity compared with volumetric measures was tested in the patients who underwent MR imaging. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients for inter- and intrarater reliability were between 0.94 and 0.98. On CT scans, Pearson's correlation of the rWTH with the transverse width of the temporal horn was between 0.60 and 0.79; with Jobst's minimum thickness of the MTL, between 0.63 and 0.78 (interuncal distance approximately 0.50); and with an index of frontal atrophy, between 0.35 and 0.42. On MR images, the correlation with volumetric MR measures was 0.80 in the temporal horn, 0.74 in the hippocampus, 0.68 in the temporal lobe, 0.58 in the entorhinal cortex, and 0.49 in the frontal lobe. On CT scans (cutoff value for AD, >5.3 mm; age range of subjects, 50-90 y), the rWTH measure was a sensitive marker for AD in 39 of 42 patients with AD (sensitivity, 93%) and was a specific marker in 28 of the 29 control patients (specificity, 97%). On MR images (cutoff 3.6-6.7 mm; age range of subject, 50-90 y), the rWTH was a sensitive marker for AD in 21 of 28 patients with AD (sensitivity, 75%) and was a specific marker in 26 of 28 control subjects (specificity, 93%). The accuracy of other linear CT-based measures of MTL atrophy and linear and volumetric MR-based measures was lower. With specificity set to 95%, sensitivity ranged from 57% to 74% for CT-based measures and from 52% to 74% for MR-based measures. CONCLUSION: The rWTH is an accurate marker of AD that could be used in routine clinical settings.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Atrophy in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures depicted with brain imaging is one of the most accurate markers of Alzheimer disease (AD), but practical considerations have thus far limited their routine clinical use. The aim of this study was to explore the validity of a CT- and MR-based measure of MTL atrophy that would be feasible for routine clinical use. METHODS: We acquired brain CT scans in the temporal lobe plane with thin sections in 42 patients with AD and in 29 control patients without dementia. We also acquired MR images (according to a 3D magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo protocol) in 28 patients with AD and in 28 control subjects without dementia. The radial width of the temporal horn (rWTH) of the lateral ventricle was measured with a precision caliper at the tip of the horn on CT scans or high-quality MR images. The validity of the rWTH variable was assessed by test-retest and interrater reliability, convergent and discriminant validity compared with progressively distant brain regions, and known-group validity (accuracy of the separation of patients with AD from control subjects). Convergent and discriminant validity compared with volumetric measures was tested in the patients who underwent MR imaging. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients for inter- and intrarater reliability were between 0.94 and 0.98. On CT scans, Pearson's correlation of the rWTH with the transverse width of the temporal horn was between 0.60 and 0.79; with Jobst's minimum thickness of the MTL, between 0.63 and 0.78 (interuncal distance approximately 0.50); and with an index of frontal atrophy, between 0.35 and 0.42. On MR images, the correlation with volumetric MR measures was 0.80 in the temporal horn, 0.74 in the hippocampus, 0.68 in the temporal lobe, 0.58 in the entorhinal cortex, and 0.49 in the frontal lobe. On CT scans (cutoff value for AD, >5.3 mm; age range of subjects, 50-90 y), the rWTH measure was a sensitive marker for AD in 39 of 42 patients with AD (sensitivity, 93%) and was a specific marker in 28 of the 29 control patients (specificity, 97%). On MR images (cutoff 3.6-6.7 mm; age range of subject, 50-90 y), the rWTH was a sensitive marker for AD in 21 of 28 patients with AD (sensitivity, 75%) and was a specific marker in 26 of 28 control subjects (specificity, 93%). The accuracy of other linear CT-based measures of MTL atrophy and linear and volumetric MR-based measures was lower. With specificity set to 95%, sensitivity ranged from 57% to 74% for CT-based measures and from 52% to 74% for MR-based measures. CONCLUSION: The rWTH is an accurate marker of AD that could be used in routine clinical settings.
Authors: T Metitieri; C Geroldi; A Pezzini; G B Frisoni; A Bianchetti; M Trabucchi Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: J W Dahlbeck; K W McCluney; J W Yeakley; M J Fenstermacher; C Bonmati; G Van Horn; J Aldag Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1991 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: E D Bigler; D D Blatter; C V Anderson; S C Johnson; S D Gale; R O Hopkins; B Burnett Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: G B Frisoni; S Govoni; C Geroldi; A Bianchetti; L Calabresi; G Franceschini; M Trabucchi Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: M P Laakso; K Partanen; P Riekkinen; M Lehtovirta; E L Helkala; M Hallikainen; T Hanninen; P Vainio; H Soininen Journal: Neurology Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: A J Bastos-Leite; J H van Waesberghe; A L Oen; W M van der Flier; P Scheltens; F Barkhof Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Sarah K Madsen; Boris A Gutman; Shantanu H Joshi; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-08-30 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: F L Giesel; H K Hahn; P A Thomann; E Widjaja; E Wignall; H von Tengg-Kobligk; J Pantel; P D Griffiths; H O Peitgen; J Schroder; M Essig Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Wolfgang Lieb; Alexa S Beiser; Ramachandran S Vasan; Zaldy S Tan; Rhoda Au; Tamara B Harris; Ronenn Roubenoff; Sanford Auerbach; Charles DeCarli; Philip A Wolf; Sudha Seshadri Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Susanne G Mueller; Michael W Weiner; Leon J Thal; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; John Q Trojanowski; Arthur W Toga; Laurel Beckett Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: G Bersani; A Quartini; G Manuali; A Iannitelli; D Pucci; F Conforti; C Di Biasi; G Gualdi Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2009-02-13 Impact factor: 2.804