Literature DB >> 33937800

Automated Organ-Level Classification of Free-Text Pathology Reports to Support a Radiology Follow-up Tracking Engine.

Jackson M Steinkamp1, Charles M Chambers1, Darco Lalevic1, Hanna M Zafar1, Tessa S Cook1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of machine learning algorithms on organ-level classification of semistructured pathology reports, to incorporate surgical pathology monitoring into an automated imaging recommendation follow-up engine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 2013 pathology reports from patients who underwent abdominal imaging at a large tertiary care center between 2012 and 2018. The reports were labeled by two annotators as relevant to four abdominal organs: liver, kidneys, pancreas and/or adrenal glands, or none. Automated classification methods were compared: simple string matching, random forests, extreme gradient boosting, support vector machines, and two neural network architectures-convolutional neural networks and long short-term memory networks. Three methods from the literature were used to provide interpretability and qualitative validation of the learned network features.
RESULTS: The neural networks performed well on the four-organ classification task (F1 score: 96.3% for convolutional neural network and 96.7% for long short-term memory vs 89.9% for support vector machines, 93.9% for extreme gradient boosting, 82.8% for random forests, and 75.2% for simple string matching). Multiple methods were used to visualize the decision-making process of the network, verifying that the networks used similar heuristics to a human annotator. The neural networks were able to classify, with a high degree of accuracy, pathology reports written in unseen formats, suggesting the networks had learned a generalizable encoding of the salient features.
CONCLUSION: Neural network-based approaches achieve high performance on organ-level pathology report classification, suggesting that it is feasible to use them within automated tracking systems.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article.See also the commentary by Liu in this issue. 2019 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33937800      PMCID: PMC8017395          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2019180052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  7 in total

1.  Unsupervised Topic Modeling in a Large Free Text Radiology Report Repository.

Authors:  Saeed Hassanpour; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Long short-term memory.

Authors:  S Hochreiter; J Schmidhuber
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Implementation of an Automated Radiology Recommendation-Tracking Engine for Abdominal Imaging Findings of Possible Cancer.

Authors:  Tessa S Cook; Darco Lalevic; Caroline Sloan; Seetharam C Chadalavada; Curtis P Langlotz; Mitchell D Schnall; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Information extraction from multi-institutional radiology reports.

Authors:  Saeed Hassanpour; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 5.  Natural Language Processing in Radiology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ewoud Pons; Loes M M Braun; M G Myriam Hunink; Jan A Kors
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Follow-up Recommendation Detection on Radiology Reports with Incidental Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  Lucas Oliveira; Ranjith Tellis; Yuechen Qian; Karen Trovato; Gabe Mankovich
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2015

7.  Hierarchical attention networks for information extraction from cancer pathology reports.

Authors:  Shang Gao; Michael T Young; John X Qiu; Hong-Jun Yoon; James B Christian; Paul A Fearn; Georgia D Tourassi; Arvind Ramanthan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Deep Learning-based Assessment of Oncologic Outcomes from Natural Language Processing of Structured Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Matthias A Fink; Klaus Kades; Arved Bischoff; Martin Moll; Merle Schnell; Maike Küchler; Gregor Köhler; Jan Sellner; Claus Peter Heussel; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Klaus Maier-Hein; Tim F Weber; Jens Kleesiek
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-07-20

2.  Classification of Multiple Diseases on Body CT Scans Using Weakly Supervised Deep Learning.

Authors:  Fakrul Islam Tushar; Vincent M D'Anniballe; Rui Hou; Maciej A Mazurowski; Wanyi Fu; Ehsan Samei; Geoffrey D Rubin; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-12-01

3.  Multi-label annotation of text reports from computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis using deep learning.

Authors:  Vincent M D'Anniballe; Fakrul Islam Tushar; Khrystyna Faryna; Songyue Han; Maciej A Mazurowski; Geoffrey D Rubin; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.298

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.