Literature DB >> 35146433

Classification of Multiple Diseases on Body CT Scans Using Weakly Supervised Deep Learning.

Fakrul Islam Tushar1, Vincent M D'Anniballe1, Rui Hou1, Maciej A Mazurowski1, Wanyi Fu1, Ehsan Samei1, Geoffrey D Rubin1, Joseph Y Lo1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To design multidisease classifiers for body CT scans for three different organ systems using automatically extracted labels from radiology text reports.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included a total of 12 092 patients (mean age, 57 years ± 18 [standard deviation]; 6172 women) for model development and testing. Rule-based algorithms were used to extract 19 225 disease labels from 13 667 body CT scans performed between 2012 and 2017. Using a three-dimensional DenseVNet, three organ systems were segmented: lungs and pleura, liver and gallbladder, and kidneys and ureters. For each organ system, a three-dimensional convolutional neural network classified each as no apparent disease or for the presence of four common diseases, for a total of 15 different labels across all three models. Testing was performed on a subset of 2158 CT volumes relative to 2875 manually derived reference labels from 2133 patients (mean age, 58 years ± 18; 1079 women). Performance was reported as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with 95% CIs calculated using the DeLong method.
RESULTS: Manual validation of the extracted labels confirmed 91%-99% accuracy across the 15 different labels. AUCs for lungs and pleura labels were as follows: atelectasis, 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.81); nodule, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.69); emphysema, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.92); effusion, 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.98); and no apparent disease, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.91). AUCs for liver and gallbladder were as follows: hepatobiliary calcification, 0.62 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.67); lesion, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.77); dilation, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.90); fatty, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.92); and no apparent disease, 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.85). AUCs for kidneys and ureters were as follows: stone, 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.87); atrophy, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.94); lesion, 0.68 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.72); cyst, 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.73); and no apparent disease, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.83).
CONCLUSION: Weakly supervised deep learning models were able to classify diverse diseases in multiple organ systems from CT scans.Keywords: CT, Diagnosis/Classification/Application Domain, Semisupervised Learning, Whole-Body Imaging© RSNA, 2022. 2022 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Diagnosis/Classification/Application Domain; Semisupervised Learning; Whole-Body Imaging

Year:  2021        PMID: 35146433      PMCID: PMC8823458          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  21 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of convolutional neural network (CNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN) architectures for radiology text report classification.

Authors:  Imon Banerjee; Yuan Ling; Matthew C Chen; Sadid A Hasan; Curtis P Langlotz; Nathaniel Moradzadeh; Brian Chapman; Timothy Amrhein; David Mong; Daniel L Rubin; Oladimeji Farri; Matthew P Lungren
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study.

Authors:  Hyo-Eun Kim; Hak Hee Kim; Boo-Kyung Han; Ki Hwan Kim; Kyunghwa Han; Hyeonseob Nam; Eun Hye Lee; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-02-06

3.  Classification of Cancer at Prostate MRI: Deep Learning versus Clinical PI-RADS Assessment.

Authors:  Patrick Schelb; Simon Kohl; Jan Philipp Radtke; Manuel Wiesenfarth; Philipp Kickingereder; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Tristan Anselm Kuder; Albrecht Stenzinger; Markus Hohenfellner; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Klaus H Maier-Hein; David Bonekamp
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Population of anatomically variable 4D XCAT adult phantoms for imaging research and optimization.

Authors:  W P Segars; Jason Bond; Jack Frush; Sylvia Hon; Chris Eckersley; Cameron H Williams; Jianqiao Feng; Daniel J Tward; J T Ratnanather; M I Miller; D Frush; E Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Real-Time Use of Artificial Intelligence in Identification of Diminutive Polyps During Colonoscopy: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Yuichi Mori; Shin-Ei Kudo; Masashi Misawa; Yutaka Saito; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Kinichi Hotta; Kazuo Ohtsuka; Fumihiko Urushibara; Shinichi Kataoka; Yushi Ogawa; Yasuharu Maeda; Kenichi Takeda; Hiroki Nakamura; Katsuro Ichimasa; Toyoki Kudo; Takemasa Hayashi; Kunihiko Wakamura; Fumio Ishida; Haruhiro Inoue; Hayato Itoh; Masahiro Oda; Kensaku Mori
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Deep Learning Prediction of Voxel-Level Liver Stiffness in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Brian L Pollack; Kayhan Batmanghelich; Stephen S Cai; Emile Gordon; Stephen Wallace; Roberta Catania; Carlos Morillo-Hernandez; Alessandro Furlan; Amir A Borhani
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-09-29

8.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  A Deep Learning Model to Predict a Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease by Using 18F-FDG PET of the Brain.

Authors:  Yiming Ding; Jae Ho Sohn; Michael G Kawczynski; Hari Trivedi; Roy Harnish; Nathaniel W Jenkins; Dmytro Lituiev; Timothy P Copeland; Mariam S Aboian; Carina Mari Aparici; Spencer C Behr; Robert R Flavell; Shih-Ying Huang; Kelly A Zalocusky; Lorenzo Nardo; Youngho Seo; Randall A Hawkins; Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni; Dexter Hadley; Benjamin L Franc
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 29.146

10.  MIMIC-CXR, a de-identified publicly available database of chest radiographs with free-text reports.

Authors:  Alistair E W Johnson; Tom J Pollard; Seth J Berkowitz; Nathaniel R Greenbaum; Matthew P Lungren; Chih-Ying Deng; Roger G Mark; Steven Horng
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 6.444

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multi-label annotation of text reports from computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis using deep learning.

Authors:  Vincent M D'Anniballe; Fakrul Islam Tushar; Khrystyna Faryna; Songyue Han; Maciej A Mazurowski; Geoffrey D Rubin; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.298

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.