Literature DB >> 33937795

Urinary Stone Detection on CT Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: Evaluation of Model Performance and Generalization.

Anushri Parakh1, Hyunkwang Lee1, Jeong Hyun Lee1, Brian H Eisner1, Dushyant V Sahani1, Synho Do1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of cascading convolutional neural network (CNN) for urinary stone detection on unenhanced CT images and to evaluate the performance of pretrained models enriched with labeled CT images across different scanners.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved, retrospective clinical study used unenhanced abdominopelvic CT scans from 535 adults suspected of having urolithiasis. The scans were obtained on two scanners (scanner 1 [hereafter S1] and scanner 2 [hereafter S2]). A radiologist reviewed clinical reports and labeled cases for determination of reference standard. Stones were present on 279 (S1, 131; S2, 148) and absent on 256 (S1, 158; S2, 98) scans. One hundred scans (50 from each scanner) were randomly reserved as the test dataset, and the rest were used for developing a cascade of two CNNs: The first CNN identified the extent of the urinary tract, and the second CNN detected presence of stone. Nine variations of models were developed through the combination of different training data sources (S1, S2, or both [hereafter SB]) with (ImageNet, GrayNet) and without (Random) pretrained CNNs. First, models were compared for generalizability at the section level. Second, models were assessed by using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy at the patient level with test dataset from both scanners (n = 100).
RESULTS: The GrayNet-pretrained model showed higher classifier exactness than did ImageNet-pretrained or Random-initialized models when tested by using data from the same or different scanners at section level. At the patient level, the AUC for stone detection was 0.92-0.95, depending on the model. Accuracy of GrayNet-SB (95%) was higher than that of ImageNet-SB (91%) and Random-SB (88%). For stones larger than 4 mm, all models showed similar performance (false-negative results: two of 34). For stones smaller than 4 mm, the number of false-negative results for GrayNet-SB, ImageNet-SB, and Random-SB were one of 16, three of 16, and five of 16, respectively. GrayNet-SB identified stones in all 22 test cases that had obstructive uropathy.
CONCLUSION: A cascading model of CNNs can detect urinary tract stones on unenhanced CT scans with a high accuracy (AUC, 0.954). Performance and generalization of CNNs across scanners can be enhanced by using transfer learning with datasets enriched with labeled medical images.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article. : An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on August 6, 2019. 2019 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33937795      PMCID: PMC8017404          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2019180066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  23 in total

1.  Value of automated coronal reformations from 64-section multidetector row computerized tomography in the diagnosis of urinary stone disease.

Authors:  Wen-Chiung Lin; Raul N Uppot; Chao-Shiang Li; Peter F Hahn; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Deep Learning at Chest Radiography: Automated Classification of Pulmonary Tuberculosis by Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Paras Lakhani; Baskaran Sundaram
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Mateusz Buda; Atsuto Maki; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2018-07-29

4.  Automated Critical Test Findings Identification and Online Notification System Using Artificial Intelligence in Imaging.

Authors:  Luciano M Prevedello; Barbaros S Erdal; John L Ryu; Kevin J Little; Mutlu Demirer; Songyue Qian; Richard D White
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  How artificial intelligence could transform emergency department operations.

Authors:  Yosef Berlyand; Ali S Raja; Stephen C Dorner; Anand M Prabhakar; Jonathan D Sonis; Ravi V Gottumukkala; Marc David Succi; Brian J Yun
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Machine-Learning-Based Electronic Triage More Accurately Differentiates Patients With Respect to Clinical Outcomes Compared With the Emergency Severity Index.

Authors:  Scott Levin; Matthew Toerper; Eric Hamrock; Jeremiah S Hinson; Sean Barnes; Heather Gardner; Andrea Dugas; Bob Linton; Tom Kirsch; Gabor Kelen
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  A renal colic fast track pathway to improve waiting times and outcomes for patients presenting to the emergency department.

Authors:  Omar Al Kadhi; Kate Manley; Madhavi Natarajan; Valmiki Lutchmedial; Abbi Forsyth; Kate Tabrett; Jonathan Betteridge; William Finch; Heinrich Hollis
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-24

9.  The Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Renal Colic across a Sample of US Hospitals: High CT Utilization Despite Low Rates of Admission and Inpatient Urologic Intervention.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Penelope S Pekow; Meng-Shiou Shieh; Charles D Scales; Tara Lagu; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States.

Authors:  Chyng-Wen Fwu; Paul W Eggers; Paul L Kimmel; John W Kusek; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ureteral calculi lithotripsy for single ureteral calculi: can DNN-assisted model help preoperatively predict risk factors for sepsis?

Authors:  Mingzhen Chen; Jiannan Yang; Junlin Lu; Ziling Zhou; Kun Huang; Sihan Zhang; Guanjie Yuan; Qingpeng Zhang; Zhen Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Deep Segmentation Networks for Segmenting Kidneys and Detecting Kidney Stones in Unenhanced Abdominal CT Images.

Authors:  Dan Li; Chuda Xiao; Yang Liu; Zhuo Chen; Haseeb Hassan; Liyilei Su; Jun Liu; Haoyu Li; Weiguo Xie; Wen Zhong; Bingding Huang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-23

3.  Moving from ImageNet to RadImageNet for Improved Transfer Learning and Generalizability.

Authors:  Alexandre Cadrin-Chênevert
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-08-10

Review 4.  The Ascent of Artificial Intelligence in Endourology: a Systematic Review Over the Last 2 Decades.

Authors:  B M Zeeshan Hameed; Milap Shah; Nithesh Naik; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Hadis Karimi; Patrick Rice; Peter Kronenberg; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Vision transformer and explainable transfer learning models for auto detection of kidney cyst, stone and tumor from CT-radiography.

Authors:  Md Nazmul Islam; Mehedi Hasan; Md Kabir Hossain; Md Golam Rabiul Alam; Md Zia Uddin; Ahmet Soylu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  RadImageNet: An Open Radiologic Deep Learning Research Dataset for Effective Transfer Learning.

Authors:  Xueyan Mei; Zelong Liu; Philip M Robson; Brett Marinelli; Mingqian Huang; Amish Doshi; Adam Jacobi; Chendi Cao; Katherine E Link; Thomas Yang; Ying Wang; Hayit Greenspan; Timothy Deyer; Zahi A Fayad; Yang Yang
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-07-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.