Literature DB >> 33937639

Validity of the Hispanic version of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire in patients with traumatic foot and ankle injuries.

Boris Alexander Zelle1, Christopher Fulton Adcock1, Ben Seth Francisco1, Nicolas Alexander Morton-Gonzaba1, Roberto José Fajardo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hispanics represent the largest minority group in the United States and are projected to represent 29% of the US population by 2060. Enrolling Hispanic patients in clinical outcome trials is critical to study a representative sample of the general population. Lack of translated and validated survey tools has been identified as a major barrier to enrolling Spanish speaking patients. The purpose of this validation study was to study the correlation between the Spanish translation of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Outcomes questionnaire (AAOS-FAOQ) and the Spanish versions of the Foot Function Index (FFI) and the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) in Hispanics from Mexican lineage with traumatic foot and ankle injuries.
METHODS: A cross-sectional validation study in 36 Hispanic patients from Mexican lineage with foot and ankle injuries was performed. The Hispanic version of the AAOS-FAOQ and the Spanish translations of the FAOQ, FHSQ, FFI, and the Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) were distributed among all patients. Subsequent statistical analysis correlating the Hispanic version of the AAOS-FAOQ to the FFI, FHSQ, and SF-36 was performed. Additional analysis on the Hispanic AAOS-FAOQ included test-retest reliability and internal consistency.
RESULTS: The Hispanic AAOS-FAOQ Global Foot and Ankle subscale showed statistically significant (P < .05) correlations with 5 of 8 subscales of the FHSQ, the FFI, and the Physical Component Summary subscale of the SF-36. The AAOS-FAOQ Global Foot & Ankle Scale also demonstrated a test-retest reliability of 0.736 and a strong internal consistency.
CONCLUSIONS: This study further validates AAOS-FAOQ in Mexican Hispanics by showing strong correlations with the validated Spanish versions of the FFI and FHSQ.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hispanic; foot; outcome measure; validation

Year:  2018        PMID: 33937639      PMCID: PMC7953699          DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OTA Int        ISSN: 2574-2167


  17 in total

1.  The American academy of orthopaedic surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population.

Authors:  Frank G Hunsaker; Dominic A Cioffi; Peter C Amadio; James G Wright; Beth Caughlin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Construct validation of the USA-Spanish version of the SF-36 health survey in a Cuban-American population with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  R Arocho; C A McMillan; P Sutton-Wallace
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Korean version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle questionnaire.

Authors:  Ji-Beom Kim; Je Kyun Kim; Sang Gyo Seo; Dong Yeon Lee
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 1.286

4.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index to Spanish.

Authors:  Joaquin Paez-Moguer; Elly Budiman-Mak; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 2.705

5.  Spanish Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire in Mexican-Americans With Traumatic Foot and Ankle Injuries.

Authors:  Boris A Zelle; Ben S Francisco; James P Bossmann; Roberto J Fajardo; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee.

Authors:  J L Marsh; Theddy F Slongo; Julie Agel; J Scott Broderick; William Creevey; Thomas A DeCoster; Laura Prokuski; Michael S Sirkin; Bruce Ziran; Brad Henley; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 7.  Lack of diversity in orthopaedic trials conducted in the United States.

Authors:  Jeremy S Somerson; Mohit Bhandari; Clayton T Vaughan; Christopher S Smith; Boris A Zelle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Measurement properties of the most commonly used Foot- and Ankle-Specific Questionnaires: the FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review.

Authors:  I N Sierevelt; R Zwiers; W Schats; D Haverkamp; C B Terwee; P A Nolte; G M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Measurement comparisons of the medical outcomes study and veterans SF-36 health survey.

Authors:  Lewis E Kazis; Austin Lee; Avron Spiro; William Rogers; Xinhua S Ren; Donald R Miller; Alfredo Selim; Alaa Hamed; Samuel C Haffer
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004

10.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons-Foot and Ankle Module (AAOS-FAMsp).

Authors:  Manuel González-Sánchez; Esther Velasco-Ramos; Maria Ruiz-Muñoz; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.