Literature DB >> 25441847

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Korean version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle questionnaire.

Ji-Beom Kim1, Je Kyun Kim1, Sang Gyo Seo2, Dong Yeon Lee3.   

Abstract

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (AFAQ) reflects patients' subjective disorder due to foot and ankle conditions. We evaluated the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Korean version of the AFAQ, after translation and transcultural adaptation of the original AFAQ into the Korean language. A total of 206 patients were enrolled, including 152 with chronic problems (experimental group) and 54 with acute problems (control group). We used the intraclass correlation coefficient to assess the test-retest reliability and Cronbach's α to assess internal reliability. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the criterion validity by correlating the Korean AFAQ scores with those from other validated scales (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux-Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal scale, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot scale, and visual analog scale for pain). To analyze discriminant validity, we evaluated the difference between the experimental and control groups using the Student t test. Of the 152 patients in the experimental group, 29 revisited our clinic postoperatively and repeated the Korean AFAQ. To analyze responsiveness, we used paired t tests to evaluate postoperative changes. In terms of test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.979 to 0.999. In terms of internal reliability, Cronbach's α was 0.528 for the stiffness and swelling subscale and greater than 0.7 for all other subscales. In terms of criterion validity, Pearson's correlation coefficient ranged from 0.492 to 0.699. The probability of the null hypothesis for discriminant validity and responsiveness was statistically significant (p < .001 and p = .021, respectively). These results showed that the Korean version of the AFAQ had the same concept and intention as the original version and is reliable, valid, and responsive.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AAOS; VAS pain; discriminant validity; outcome assessment; test-retest reliability; transcultural adaptation; translation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25441847     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  2 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases.

Authors:  Yuanxi Jia; Hsiaomin Huang; Joel J Gagnier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Validity of the Hispanic version of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire in patients with traumatic foot and ankle injuries.

Authors:  Boris Alexander Zelle; Christopher Fulton Adcock; Ben Seth Francisco; Nicolas Alexander Morton-Gonzaba; Roberto José Fajardo
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2018-05-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.