Rubina Manuela Trimboli1, Marina Codari2, Andrea Cozzi1, Caterina Beatrice Monti1, Davide Capra1, Carolina Nenna3, Diana Spinelli4, Giovanni Di Leo5, Giuseppe Baselli2, Francesco Sardanelli1,5. 1. Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. 2. Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. 3. Corso di Laurea in Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. 4. Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. 5. Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast arterial calcifications (BAC), representing Mönckeberg's sclerosis of the tunica media of breast arteries, are an imaging biomarker for cardiovascular risk stratification in the female population. Our aim was to estimate the intra- and inter-reader reproducibility of a semiquantitative score for BAC assessment (BAC-SS). METHODS: Consecutive women who underwent screening mammography at our center from January 1st to January 31st, 2018 were retrieved and included according to BAC presence. Two readers (R1 and R2) independently applied the BAC-SS to medio-lateral oblique views, obtaining a BAC score by summing: (I) number of calcified vessels (from 0 to n); (II) vessel opacification, i.e., the degree of artery coverage by calcium bright pixels (0 or 1); and (III) length class of calcified vessels (from 0 to 4). R1 repeated the assessment 2 weeks later. Scoring time was recorded. Cohen's κ statistics and Bland-Altman analysis were used. RESULTS: Among 408 women, 57 (14%) had BAC; 114 medio-lateral oblique views were assessed. Median BAC score was 4 [interquartile range (IQR): 3-6] for R1 and 4 (IQR: 2-6) for R2 (P=0.417) while median scoring time was 156 s (IQR: 99-314 s) for R1 and 191 s (IQR: 137-292 s) for R2 (P=0.743). Bland-Altman analysis showed a 77% intra-reader reproducibility [bias: 0.193, coefficient of repeatability (CoR): 0.955] and a 64% inter-reader reproducibility (bias: 0.211, CoR: 1.516). Cohen's κ for BAC presence was 0.968 for intra-reader agreement and 0.937 for inter-reader agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Our BAC-SS has a good intra- and inter-reader reproducibility, within acceptable scoring times. A large-scale study is warranted to test its ability to stratify cardiovascular risk in women. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Breast arterial calcifications (BAC), representing Mönckeberg's sclerosis of the tunica media of breast arteries, are an imaging biomarker for cardiovascular risk stratification in the female population. Our aim was to estimate the intra- and inter-reader reproducibility of a semiquantitative score for BAC assessment (BAC-SS). METHODS: Consecutive women who underwent screening mammography at our center from January 1st to January 31st, 2018 were retrieved and included according to BAC presence. Two readers (R1 and R2) independently applied the BAC-SS to medio-lateral oblique views, obtaining a BAC score by summing: (I) number of calcified vessels (from 0 to n); (II) vessel opacification, i.e., the degree of artery coverage by calcium bright pixels (0 or 1); and (III) length class of calcified vessels (from 0 to 4). R1 repeated the assessment 2 weeks later. Scoring time was recorded. Cohen's κ statistics and Bland-Altman analysis were used. RESULTS: Among 408 women, 57 (14%) had BAC; 114 medio-lateral oblique views were assessed. Median BAC score was 4 [interquartile range (IQR): 3-6] for R1 and 4 (IQR: 2-6) for R2 (P=0.417) while median scoring time was 156 s (IQR: 99-314 s) for R1 and 191 s (IQR: 137-292 s) for R2 (P=0.743). Bland-Altman analysis showed a 77% intra-reader reproducibility [bias: 0.193, coefficient of repeatability (CoR): 0.955] and a 64% inter-reader reproducibility (bias: 0.211, CoR: 1.516). Cohen's κ for BAC presence was 0.968 for intra-reader agreement and 0.937 for inter-reader agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Our BAC-SS has a good intra- and inter-reader reproducibility, within acceptable scoring times. A large-scale study is warranted to test its ability to stratify cardiovascular risk in women. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Marco Zuin; Gianluca Rigatelli; Fiorenzo Scaranello; Sergio Giuseppe Ribecco; Claudio Picariello; Giovanni Zuliani; Giuseppe Faggian; Pietro Zonzin; Loris Roncon Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Juan Wang; Huanjun Ding; Fatemeh Azamian Bidgoli; Brian Zhou; Carlos Iribarren; Sabee Molloi; Pierre Baldi Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Domnique Newallo; Felix G Meinel; U Joseph Schoepf; Stefan Baumann; Carlo N De Cecco; Rebecca J Leddy; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Helge Möllmann; Christian W Hamm; Pamela B Morris; Matthias Renker Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Sing Ching Lee; Michael Phillips; Jamie Bellinge; Jennifer Stone; Elizabeth Wylie; Carl Schultz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 3.240