Literature DB >> 33936404

The anatomy of clinical documentation: an assessment and classification of narrative note sections format and content.

Tiago K Colicchio1, Pavithra I Dissanayake1, James J Cimino1.   

Abstract

Introduction. We systematically analyzed the most commonly used narrative note formats and content found in primary and specialty care visit notes to inform future research and electronic health record (EHR) development. Methods. We extracted data from the history of present illness (HPI) and impression and plan (IP) sections of 80 primary and specialty care visit notes. Two authors iteratively classified the format of the sections and compared the size of each section and the overall note size between primary and specialty care notes. We then annotated the content of these sections to develop a taxonomy of types of data communicated in the narrative note sections. Results. Both HPI and IP were significantly longer in primary care when compared to specialty care notes (HPI: n = 187 words, SD[130] vs. n = 119 words, SD [53]; p = 0.004 / IP: n = 270 words, SD [145] vs. n = 170 words, SD [101]; p < 0.001). Although we did not find a significant difference in the overall note size between the two groups, the proportion of HPI and IP content in relation to the total note size was significantly higher in primary care notes (40%, SD [13] vs. 28%, SD [11]; p < 0.001). We identified five combinations of format of HPI + IP sections respectively: (A) story + list with categories; (B) story + story; (C) list without categories + list with categories; (D) list with categories + list with categories; and (E) list with categories + story. HPI and IP content was significantly smaller in combination C compared to combination A (-172 words, [95% Conf. -326, -17.89]; p = 0.02). We identified seven taxa representing 45 different types of data: finding/condition documented (n = 14), intervention documented (n = 9), general descriptions and definitions (n = 7), temporal information (n = 6), reasons and justifications (n = 4), participants and settings (n = 4), and clinical documentation (n = 1). Conclusion. We identified commonly used narrative note section formats and developed a taxonomy of narrative note content to help researchers to tailor their efforts and design more efficient clinical documentation systems. ©2020 AMIA - All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33936404      PMCID: PMC8075472     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  23 in total

1.  Use of electronic clinical documentation: time spent and team interactions.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; David K Vawdrey; Matthew R Fred; Susan B Bostwick
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Report of the AMIA EHR-2020 Task Force on the status and future direction of EHRs.

Authors:  Thomas H Payne; Sarah Corley; Theresa A Cullen; Tejal K Gandhi; Linda Harrington; Gilad J Kuperman; John E Mattison; David P McCallie; Clement J McDonald; Paul C Tang; William M Tierney; Charlotte Weaver; Charlene R Weir; Michael H Zaroukian
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Physician Information Needs and Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Time to Reengineer the Clinic Note.

Authors:  Richelle J Koopman; Linsey M Barker Steege; Joi L Moore; Martina A Clarke; Shannon M Canfield; Min S Kim; Jeffery L Belden
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Physician Burnout in the Electronic Health Record Era.

Authors:  N Lance Downing; David W Bates; Christopher A Longhurst
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Toward Medical Documentation That Enhances Situational Awareness Learning.

Authors:  Leslie A Lenert
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

6.  Clinicians' reasoning as reflected in electronic clinical note-entry and reading/retrieval: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis.

Authors:  Tiago K Colicchio; James J Cimino
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Safe Practices for Copy and Paste in the EHR. Systematic Review, Recommendations, and Novel Model for Health IT Collaboration.

Authors:  Amy Y Tsou; Christoph U Lehmann; Jeremy Michel; Ronni Solomon; Lorraine Possanza; Tejal Gandhi
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  Medical records that guide and teach.

Authors:  L L Weed
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1968-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Using clinical reasoning ontologies to make smarter clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and data synthesis.

Authors:  Pavithra I Dissanayake; Tiago K Colicchio; James J Cimino
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Allocation of Physician Time in Ambulatory Practice: A Time and Motion Study in 4 Specialties.

Authors:  Christine Sinsky; Lacey Colligan; Ling Li; Mirela Prgomet; Sam Reynolds; Lindsey Goeders; Johanna Westbrook; Michael Tutty; George Blike
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Electronic Health Records on Information Practices in Mental Health Contexts: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Timothy Charles Kariotis; Megan Prictor; Shanton Chang; Kathleen Gray
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 7.076

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.