| Literature DB >> 33936125 |
Haijiao Liu1,2, Hongrui Gu1,2, Chen Ye1,2, Cunwu Guo1,2, Yifan Zhu1,2, Huichuan Huang1,2, Yixiang Liu1,2, Xiahong He3, Min Yang1,2, Shusheng Zhu1,2.
Abstract
Adjusting planting density is a common agricultural practice used to achieve maximum yields. However, whether the quality of medicinal herbs can be impn>roved by impn>lementing appropriate planting densities is still uncertain. The medicinal crop Panax notoginseng was used to analyze the effects of planting density on growth and ginsenoside accumulation, and the possible mechanisms of these effects were revealed through metabonomics. The results showed that P. notoginseng achieved high ginsenoside accumulation at high planting densities (8 × 8 and 10 × 10 cm), while simultaneously achieved high biomass and ginsenoside accumulation at moderate planting density of 15 × 15 cm. At the moderate planting density, the primary metabolism (starch and sucrose metabolism) and secondary metabolism (the biosynthesis of phytohormone IAA and ginsenoside) of the plants were significantly enhanced. However, the strong intraspecific competition at the high planting densities resulted in stress as well as the accumulation of phytohormones (SA and JA), antioxidants (gentiobiose, oxalic acid, dehydroascorbic acid) and other stress resistance-related metabolites. Interestingly, the dry biomass and ginsenoside content were significantly lower at low densities (20 × 20 and 30 × 30 cm) with low intraspecific competition, which disturbed normal carbohydrate metabolism by upregulating galactose metabolism. In summary, an appropriate planting density was benefit for the growth and accumulation of ginsenosides in P. notoginseng by balancing primary metabolism and secondary metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: Panax notoginseng; ginsenosides; plant density; primary metabolism; secondary metabolism
Year: 2021 PMID: 33936125 PMCID: PMC8086637 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.628294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Experimental scheme and effects of plant density on the growth and root morphology of P. notoginseng. (A) Experimental design with five P. notoginseng planting densities. D1~D5 represent densities of 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 15 × 15, 20 × 20, and 30 × 30 cm, respectively. (B) Seedling germination rate and survival rate. (C) Plant height. (D) Dry biomass. (E) Root length per plant. (F) Surface area per plant. (G) Root volume per plant. Error bars indicate the standard error (SE). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05; n = 4).
Figure 2Effects of plant density on phytohormone content in P. notoginseng roots. (A) SA. (B) JA. (C) IAA. (D) ABA. D1-D5 represent P. notoginseng grown at densities of 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 15 × 15, 20 × 20, and 30 × 30 cm, respectively. All data are presented as the mean ± standard error (SE). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05; n = 4).
Figure 3Effects of planting densities on the content of ginsenoside and relative expression level of DS. (A) Total contents of five ginsenosides in the taproot and fibrous root. (B) Relative expression level of DS. Monomeric ginsenoside in the taproot (C) and fibrous roots (D) of P. notoginseng. D1~D5 represent densities of 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 15 × 15, 20 × 20, and 30 × 30 cm, respectively. Error bars indicate the standard error (SE). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among the five density treatments (p < 0.05; n = 4). The different colors in (C) and (D) indicate the changes in monomer ginsenoside content in taproots and fibrous roots.
Figure 4DAMs in the fibrous roots of P. notoginseng grown at different planting densities. (A) Score plot of the PCA model of all samples. (B) Venn diagram of the DAMs in four pairwise comparisons. (C) DAMs involved in metabolic pathways. The ordinate is the pathway name, and the colored line on the right indicates the pathway type. The number on the bar chart is the number of DAMs annotated in the pathway. The x-coordinate represents the proportion of the annotated DAMs in that pathway to all annotated DAMs. (D) Heat map comparing the relative intensity of DAMs among the different density treatments. The dendrogram on the left clusters similarly extracted metabolites based on hierarchical clustering, and the heat map displays the intensity of metabolites normalized within each row (metabolite). The dendrogram on the top indicates the clusters of the five density treatments. D1-D5 represent densities of 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 15 × 15, 20 × 20, and 30 × 30 cm, respectively.
Figure 5Pearson correlation analysis between DAMs and ginsenosides in the fibrous roots and taproots of P. notoginseng. *Indicates a significant correlation at p < 0.05 and **indicates a significant correlation at p < 0.01. The red box represents a positive correlation, the green box represents a negative correlation, and the depth of the color represents the degree of correlation.