| Literature DB >> 33936125 |
Haijiao Liu1,2, Hongrui Gu1,2, Chen Ye1,2, Cunwu Guo1,2, Yifan Zhu1,2, Huichuan Huang1,2, Yixiang Liu1,2, Xiahong He3, Min Yang1,2, Shusheng Zhu1,2.
Abstract
Adjusting planting density is a common agricultural practice used to achieve maximum yielEntities:
Keywords: Panax notoginseng; ginsenosides; plant density; primary metabolism; secondary metabolism
Year: 2021 PMID: 33936125 PMCID: PMC8086637 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.628294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Experimental scheme and effects of plant density on the growth and root morphology of P. notoginseng. (A) Experimental design with five P. notoginseng planting densities. D1~D5 represent densities of 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 15 × 15, 20 × 20, and 30 × 30 cm, respectively. (B) Seedling germination rate and survival rate. (C) Plant height. (D) Dry biomass. (E) Root length per plant. (F) Surface area per plant. (G) Root volume per plant. Error bars indicate the standard error (SE). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05; n = 4).
Figure 2Effects of plant density on phytohormone content in P. notoginseng roots. (A) SA. (B) JA. (C) IAA. (D) ABA. D1-D5 represent P. notoginseng grown at densities of 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 15 × 15, 20 × 20, and 30 × 30 cm, respectively. All data are presented as the mean ± standard error (SE). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05; n = 4).
Figure 3Effects of planting densities on the content of ginsenoside and relative expression level of DS. (A) Total contents of five ginsenosides in the taproot and fibrous root. (B) Relative expression level of DS. Monomeric ginsenoside in the taproot (C) and fibrous roots (D) of P. notoginseng. D1~D5 represent densities of 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 15 × 15, 20 × 20, and 30 × 30 cm, respectively. Error bars indicate the standard error (SE). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among the five density treatments (p < 0.05; n = 4). The different colors in (C) and (D) indicate the changes in monomer ginsenoside content in taproots and fibrous roots.
Figure 4DAMs in the fibrous roots of P. notoginseng grown at different planting densities. (A) Score plot of the PCA model of all samples. (B) Venn diagram of the DAMs in four pairwise comparisons. (C) DAMs involved in metabolic pathways. The ordinate is the pathway name, and the colored line on the right indicates the pathway type. The number on the bar chart is the number of DAMs annotated in the pathway. The x-coordinate represents the proportion of the annotated DAMs in that pathway to all annotated DAMs. (D) Heat map comparing the relative intensity of DAMs among the different density treatments. The dendrogram on the left clusters similarly extracted metabolites based on hierarchical clustering, and the heat map displays the intensity of metabolites normalized within each row (metabolite). The dendrogram on the top indicates the clusters of the five density treatments. D1-D5 represent densities of 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 15 × 15, 20 × 20, and 30 × 30 cm, respectively.
Figure 5Pearson correlation analysis between DAMs and ginsenosides in the fibrous roots and taproots of P. notoginseng. *Indicates a significant correlation at p < 0.05 and **indicates a significant correlation at p < 0.01. The red box represents a positive correlation, the green box represents a negative correlation, and the depth of the color represents the degree of correlation.