Literature DB >> 33934379

Limb preference impacts single-leg forward hop limb symmetry index values following ACL reconstruction.

Brooke Farmer1, Dillon Anderson2, Dimitrios Katsavelis3, Jennifer J Bagwell4, Kimberly A Turman5, Terry L Grindstaff1.   

Abstract

Following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction limb dominance for performing tasks is not considered when making rehabilitation progression decisions. The purpose of this study was to determine if strength and functional outcomes differ between individuals who injured their preferred or nonpreferred jumping limb and to determine if these same outcomes differ between individuals who injured their preferred or nonpreferred limb used to kick a ball. A secondary purpose was to determine the association of quadriceps strength and single-leg forward hop performance with patient self-reported function. Forty individuals with ACL reconstruction (age = 20.0 ± 4.6 years, height = 174.2 ± 12.7 cm, mass = 71.2 ± 12.7 kg, time since surgery = 5.3 ± 0.8 months) were included in the study. Primary outcome measures included, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) scores, quadriceps limb symmetry index (LSI) values, and single-leg forward hop LSI values. Limb preference was defined two ways, kicking a ball and performing a unilateral jump. There were no significant differences between groups based on injury to the preferred limb to kick a ball for any of the outcome variables. Individuals who injured their nonpreferred jumping limb demonstrated significantly (p = 0.05, d = 0.77) lower single-leg forward hop LSI values (81.1% ± 19.5%) compared to individuals who injured their preferred jumping limb (94.1% ± 12.6%), but demonstrated no differences in IKDC scores or quadriceps LSI values. Quadriceps LSI and single-leg forward hop LSI explained 73% of the variance in IKDC scores, but quadriceps LSI had the strongest association (r = 0.790). These findings suggests that limb preference influences single forward hop LSI values and should be considered following ACL reconstruction.
© 2021 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; limb dominance or preference; limb symmetry index (LSI)

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33934379      PMCID: PMC8560653          DOI: 10.1002/jor.25073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  48 in total

1.  Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Håvard Moksnes; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sylvia Czuppon; Brad A Racette; Sandra E Klein; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  An interval kicking progression for return to soccer following lower extremity injury.

Authors:  Amelia Arundale; Holly Silvers; David Logerstedt; Jaime Rojas; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-02

4.  The influence of quadriceps strength asymmetry on patient-reported function at time of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Christin Zwolski; Laura C Schmitt; Catherine Quatman-Yates; Staci Thomas; Timothy E Hewett; Mark V Paterno
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Athletes With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Were Slower to Meet Rehabilitation Milestones and Return-to-Sport Criteria Than Athletes With Hamstring Tendon Autograft or Soft Tissue Allograft : Secondary Analysis From the ACL-SPORTS Trial.

Authors:  Angela Hutchinson Smith; Jacob J Capin; Ryan Zarzycki; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea Reid; Trevor B Birmingham; Paul W Stratford; Greg K Alcock; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2007-02-20

7.  Measuring voluntary quadriceps activation: Effect of visual feedback and stimulus delivery.

Authors:  Brittney A Luc; Matthew H Harkey; Gabrielle D Arguelles; J Troy Blackburn; Eric D Ryan; Brian Pietrosimone
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study.

Authors:  David Logerstedt; Hege Grindem; Andrew Lynch; Ingrid Eitzen; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop Tests.

Authors:  William T Davies; Gregory D Myer; Paul J Read
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Development of a test battery to enhance safe return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Alli Gokeler; Wouter Welling; Stefano Zaffagnini; Romain Seil; Darin Padua
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.