Literature DB >> 34436740

Superiority of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT scan in detecting additional lesions compared to 18FDG PET/CT scan in breast cancer.

Umut Elboga1, Ertan Sahin2, Tulay Kus3, Yusuf Burak Cayirli2, Gokmen Aktas4, Evren Uzun5, Havva Yesil Cinkir3, Fatih Teker3, Ozlem Nuray Sever3, Alper Aytekin6, Latif Yilmaz6, Aydin Aytekin3, Ufuk Cimen2, Vuslat Mumcu2, Benan Kilbas7, Y Zeki Çelen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the ability of 68Ga-FAPI PET//CT with 18FDG PET/CT imaging techniques to detect additional lesions in breast cancer patients that may affect further chemotherapy options.
METHODS: A total of 48 patients with breast cancer underwent concurrent 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18FDG PET/CT regardless of whether they had received chemotherapy or not in the last month before imaging. Both modalities were compared according to various parameters: clinical/pathological features, number of lesions detected, activity uptake (SUVmax), and the effect on the evaluation of response to treatment in the post-chemotherapy group.
RESULTS: This retrospective study included 48 patients with breast cancer (mean age 53.3 ± 11.7 years; IDC 89.6%; ILC 10.4%). In the comparison of both modalities, no statistical significance was obtained in terms of the pathological characteristics of the patients. More lesions were demonstrated in all categorized regions in 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT imaging with higher uptake values compared to 18FDG PET/CT in this study. In the treatment response evaluation of the post-chemotherapy group, 12 cases (12/24) who were evaluated as PMR, CMR, or SD according to 18FDG PET/CT results were later accepted as PD due to newly detected lesions in complementary 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT imaging and treatment of patients was managed accordingly by clinicians.
CONCLUSION: It was determined that 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was superior to 18FDG PET/CT in terms of accuracy and it was thought that 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT could be utilized as an additional complementary imaging to 18FDG PET/CT. Moreover, 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT, with its significant theranostic potential, could become a key element in predicting the pathological response of breast cancer patients in further researches.
© 2021. The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18FDG; 68Ga-FAPI; Breast cancer; Early chemotherapy response; PET/CT

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34436740     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01672-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  21 in total

1.  The US Office for Human Research Protections' judgment of the SUPPORT trial seems entirely reasonable.

Authors:  Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-07-23

2.  Evidence-Based Best Practices: 18F-FDG PET Staging of Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gary A Ulaner; Heather A Jacene; Ashwin Singh Parihar; David Groheux
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 7.794

3.  Cancer associated fibroblasts: the dark side of the coin.

Authors:  Paolo Cirri; Paola Chiarugi
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Imaging fibroblast activation protein in liver cancer: a single-center post hoc retrospective analysis to compare [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT versus MRI and [18F]-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Yizhen Pang; Lanlin Yao; Liang Zhao; Chunlei Fan; Jingpeng Ke; Ping Guo; Bing Hao; Hao Fu; Chengrong Xie; Qin Lin; Hua Wu; Long Sun; Haojun Chen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Seprase, a membrane-bound protease, is overexpressed by invasive ductal carcinoma cells of human breast cancers.

Authors:  T Kelly; S Kechelava; T L Rozypal; K W West; S Korourian
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  High-risk lesions of the breast: concurrent diagnostic tools and management recommendations.

Authors:  Francesca Catanzariti; Daly Avendano; Giuseppe Cicero; Margarita Garza-Montemayor; Carmelo Sofia; Emmanuele Venanzi Rullo; Giorgio Ascenti; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Maria Adele Marino
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 8.  Economic analysis of the breast cancer screening program used by the UK NHS: should the program be maintained?

Authors:  Robert Morton; Meelad Sayma; Manraj Singh Sura
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-03-24

Review 9.  Pretherapeutic Imaging for Axillary Staging in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ultrasound, MRI and FDG PET.

Authors:  Morwenn Le Boulc'h; Julia Gilhodes; Zara Steinmeyer; Sébastien Molière; Carole Mathelin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  The Role of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for Patients with Malignancies of the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract: First Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Stefan A Koerber; Fabian Staudinger; Clemens Kratochwil; Sebastian Adeberg; Matthias F Haefner; Guy Ungerechts; Hendrik Rathke; Erik Winter; Thomas Lindner; Mustafa Syed; Irfan A Bhatti; Klaus Herfarth; Peter L Choyke; Dirk Jaeger; Uwe Haberkorn; Juergen Debus; Frederik L Giesel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 11.082

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical summary of fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-based radiopharmaceuticals: cancer and beyond.

Authors:  Mengting Li; Muhsin H Younis; Yongxue Zhang; Weibo Cai; Xiaoli Lan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  68Ga-FAPI PET/CT detected non-FDG-avid bone metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  Qihang Shang; Bing Hao; Weizhi Xu; Tinghua Meng; Yizhen Pang; Long Sun; Haojun Chen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Clinical Evaluation of Nuclear Imaging Agents in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ziqi Li; Mariam S Aboian; Xiaohua Zhu; Bernadette Marquez-Nostra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Head-to-Head Comparison of Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) Radiotracers versus [18F]F-FDG in Oncology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giorgio Treglia; Barbara Muoio; Hessamoddin Roustaei; Zahra Kiamanesh; Kamran Aryana; Ramin Sadeghi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Fibroblast activation protein-based theranostics in cancer research: A state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Jianhao Chen; Yizhen Pang; Kaili Fu; Qihang Shang; Hua Wu; Long Sun; Qin Lin; Haojun Chen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 11.556

6.  Non-conventional and Investigational PET Radiotracers for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michele Balma; Virginia Liberini; Manuela Racca; Riccardo Laudicella; Matteo Bauckneht; Ambra Buschiazzo; Daniele Giovanni Nicolotti; Simona Peano; Andrea Bianchi; Giovanni Albano; Natale Quartuccio; Ronan Abgral; Silvia Daniela Morbelli; Calogero D'Alessandria; Enzo Terreno; Martin William Huellner; Alberto Papaleo; Désirée Deandreis
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.