Literature DB >> 33934306

In silico screening of potent bioactive compounds from honeybee products against COVID-19 target enzymes.

Moataz A Shaldam1, Galal Yahya2,3, Nashwa H Mohamed4, Mohamed M Abdel-Daim5,6, Yahya Al Naggar7,8.   

Abstract

After the early advent of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, myriads of FDA-approved drugs have been massively repurposed for COVID-19 treatment based on molecular docking against selected protein targets that play fundamental roles in the replication cycle of the novel coronavirus. Honeybee products are well known of their nutritional values and medicinal effects. Bee products contain bioactive compounds in the form of a collection of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and terpenes of natural origin that display wide spectrum antiviral effects. We revealed by molecular docking the profound binding affinity of 14 selected phenolics and terpenes present in honey and propolis (bees glue) against the main protease (Mpro) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) enzymes of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus (the causative agent of COVID-19) using AutoDock Vina software. Of these compounds, p-coumaric acid, ellagic acid, kaempferol, and quercetin have the strongest interaction with the SARS-CoV-2 target enzymes, and it may be considered an effective COVID-19 inhibitor.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Drug repurposing; Honeybee products; Molecular docking; Natural products; Phenolic compounds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33934306      PMCID: PMC8088405          DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14195-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


Introduction

In December 2019, COVID-19 firstly manifested in Wuhan, province of Hubei in China, where frequent number of patients shared similar symptoms of dry cough, fever, and fatigue; then they developed into dyspnea quickly, ending up with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in severe cases (Chen et al. 2020; Chan et al. 2020; Zhu et al. 2020; Huang et al. 2020; Zhou et al. 2020). As of 1st of May 2021, the cumulative number of cases diagnosed with COVID-19 in the world was more than 153 million, whereas more than 3 million cases died (Coronavirus Update (Live): https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus - Worldometer 2021). As a direct effect of the outbreak, more than 160 countries are fighting to combat the spread of COVID-19 and taking protective measures to save their citizens from the pandemic; at the same time, research institutes, drug corporations, biotechnology institutes, and research groups all over the world are racing to develop effective drugs or potential vaccines for COVID-19 (Sharpe et al. 2020; Thanh Le et al. 2020; Pooladanda et al. 2020; Hachfi and Ben Lasfar 2020; Mullard 2020; Biopharma products in development for COVID-19 2021). As a fast track to save the time needed for safety and approval studies, researchers started to massively repurpose already FDA-approved drugs for COVID-19 treatment (Kandeel and Al-Nazawi 2020; Harrison 2020). Computational-based techniques like molecular modeling and virtual screening represent magic tools that help to understand the molecular aspects of protein ligand interactions during rational drug design process (Murgueitio et al. 2012). Virtual screening has been encountered in structure-based drug design against emerging and fatal diseases of viral origin (Sirois et al. 2004; Elhefnawi et al. 2012; Raj and Varadwaj 2016; Zhou et al. 2008; Plewczynski et al. 2007). The key protease (Mpro) and the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP), which are responsible for the viral polyprotein proteolytic process as well as viral genome replication and transcription, are two promising drug targets for SARS-CoV-related diseases (Gao et al. 2020) and the main protease (Mpro) responsible for virus maturation in addition to crucial roles in mediating viral replication and transcription (Jin et al. 2020). Based on their crucial role in the life cycle of SARS-CoV-2, these two target sites have been extensively docked to design or distinguish structure-based effective drugs for COVID-19 (Dai et al. 2020). Bioactive compounds of natural origin are currently screened by molecular docking to in silico test their affinity to molecular targets of COVID-19 taking the advantage that natural products are free from toxic or side effects (Mani et al. 2020; Sayed et al. 2020; Gurung et al. 2020; Khalifa et al. 2020b). Recently, honeybee products have been proposed as a potential compatible antiseptic to help protect against the COVID-19 based on biocidal effect of hydrogen peroxide and other phytochemicals existing in bee products (Al Naggar et al. 2020). These phenolic compounds and terpenes found in honeybee products were documented to possess variable medicinal effects including wound healing, antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, and neuroprotective activities (Küçük et al. 2007; Mohamed et al. 2009; Al Naggar et al. 2016; Pasupuleti et al. 2017; Jibril et al. 2019; El-Seedi et al. 2020; Al Naggar et al. 2020; Al Naggar et al. 2021). In our study, we performed deep virtual screening via molecular docking to test binding affinity of various selected bioactive compounds such as terpenes and flavonoids of honey and propolis as inhibitors against the COVID-19 essential enzymes: RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and the main protease.

Docking methodology

The crystal structures of COVID-19 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) (PDB code: 6M71) (Gao et al. 2020) and the main protease (Mpro) (PDB code: 6LU7) (Jin et al. 2020) were retrieved from Protein Data Bank. This docking study was carried out on 14 compounds (Fig. 1) from honey and propolis into the receptor active site using AutoDock Vina (Trott and Olson 2010). These compounds were selected based on previously reported antiviral activities against related viruses to COVID-19 (Al Naggar et al. 2020; Shahidi and Yeo 2018); in the same context, several studies employing virtual screening of closely related members or categories of the selected phytochemicals were performed against SARS-CoV-2 proteins since these phytochemicals are naturally existing in plants and spices (Sayed et al. 2020; Ibrahim et al. 2020; Umesh et al. 2020).
Fig. 1

Chemical structure of important bioactive compounds in honeybee products

Chemical structure of important bioactive compounds in honeybee products Ligand structures were drawn into Marvin Sketch V19.12 (Marvin | ChemAxon 2020), and the most energetically favored conformer was exported as (*.pdb) file format. AutoDockTools package (Morris et al. 2009) was used to assign Gasteiger atomic partial charges, and all the rotatable bonds in ligands were set to be flexible. For receptor preparation, all water molecules were removed, the co-crystalized ligand was removed, Gasteiger atomic partial charges were assigned, and all receptors and ligands were converted to the PDBQT format using AutoDockTools package for docking process. In the AutoDock Vina configuration files, the parameter num modes was set to 10 and exhaustiveness to 14. The grid boxes of center (x= 118.23, y= 103.32, and z= 118.37) with size (x=17, y=25, z=17) for the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and center (x= −10.71, y= 12.41, and z= 68.83) with size (x=16, y=18, z=16) for the main protease were used to define the active site. AutoDock Vina was executed. Pymol (PyMOL Molecular Visualization System 2020) was used for 3D visualization, and the 2D schematic presentation was generated using LigPlot+ V1.4.5 (Laskowski and Swindells 2011).

Results and discussion

Computational docking was implemented to predict the binding mode of 14 compounds representing flavonoids, phenolic acids, and terpenes from honey and propolis (Fig. 1) with two different targets from COVID-19. The bioactive compounds, ellagic acid, hesperetin, and kaempferol, are the most promising compounds on COVID-19 RdRp, while artepillin C, ellagic acid, hesperetin, kaempferol, and quercetin were the most active on the main protease (Mpro). The binding scores for each compound into the two targets are shown in Table 1. The binding mode for ellagic acid to COVID-19 RdRb was attributed to H-bond interaction with Gly808, pro809, His816, Thr817, and Tyr 831, while amino acid residues Trp617, Asp760, and Asp761 are positioned at distance of H-bond with hesperetin, and also kaempferol interacts with Glu811 and Asp761 by H-bond. Furthermore, the aromatic ring system of ellagic acid, hesperetin, and kaempferol makes π-ion hydrophobic interaction with Lys798 (Fig. 2). We repurpose the compounds of interesting binding scores as potent inhibitors of viral replication.
Table 1

The binding scores for each compound into the two target enzymes of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and the main protease (Mpro)

Bioactive compoundsSARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymeraseSARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro)
2,2-Dimethyl-8-prenylchromene−5.6−6.8
Artepillin C−5.9−7.5
3-Prenyl cinnamic acid allyl ester−5.3−6.2
Isocupressic acid−5.8−6.4
13C-symphyoreticulic acid−5.7−6.9
Ellagic acid−6.4−7.5
Syringic acid−5.5−5.6
Caffeic acid phenethyl ester−5.4−7.0
p-Coumaric acid−5.3−5.6
Hesperetin−6.3−7.4
Naringenin−6.0−6.5
Kaempferol−6.2−7.8
Quercetin−6.1−7.4
Chrysin−6.1−7.2
Fig. 2

The docking complex of a ellagic acid, b hesperetin, and c kaempferol (green) with the X-ray structure of 6M71; SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (left, tint) that showed hydrogen bond (blue) interaction and 2D schematic diagram of the interaction (right)

The binding scores for each compound into the two target enzymes of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and the main protease (Mpro) The docking complex of a ellagic acid, b hesperetin, and c kaempferol (green) with the X-ray structure of 6M71; SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (left, tint) that showed hydrogen bond (blue) interaction and 2D schematic diagram of the interaction (right) From the docking of all identified compounds into the active site of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) in the current study, artepillin C showed H-bond interaction with Cys145, Arg188, Thr190, and Gln192, while amino acid residues His41, Gly143, and Arg188 are positioned at distance of H-bond with ellagic acid (Fig. 3). In addition, hesperetin interacts with Gly143 by H-bond, while amino acid residues Tyr54, Leu141, Ser144, Asp 187, and Gln189 are positioned at distance of H-bond with kaempferol, and also quercetin makes H-bond with Tyr54, Leu141, Ser144, His163, and Gln189. Furthermore, the aromatic ring system of artepillin C, ellagic acid, hesperetin, kaempferol, and quercetin makes π-ion hydrophobic interaction with either Met165 or Glu166 (Fig. 4). Taken together we propose the indicated flavonoids as potential inhibitors of the main protease of COVID-19, thus limiting viral maturation.
Fig. 3

The docking complex of a artepillin C and b ellagic acid (green) with the X-ray structure of 6LU7; SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) (left, tint) that showed hydrogen bond (blue) interaction and 2D schematic diagram of the interaction (right)

Fig. 4

The docking complex of a hesperetin, b kaempferol, and c quercetin (green) with the X-ray structure of 6LU7; SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) (left, tint) that showed hydrogen bond (blue) interaction and 2D schematic diagram of the interaction (right)

The docking complex of a artepillin C and b ellagic acid (green) with the X-ray structure of 6LU7; SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) (left, tint) that showed hydrogen bond (blue) interaction and 2D schematic diagram of the interaction (right) The docking complex of a hesperetin, b kaempferol, and c quercetin (green) with the X-ray structure of 6LU7; SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) (left, tint) that showed hydrogen bond (blue) interaction and 2D schematic diagram of the interaction (right) In line with our finding, promising candidates identified in our study like p-coumaric acid, ellagic acid, kaempferol, and quercetin were previously found to have potential antiviral activity against the common cold human rhinovirus which is RNA virus like SARS-CoV-2; surprisingly the mentioned bioactive compounds were suggested in the same study to block or reduce the viral entry into the cells to protect the cells from the virus cytopathic effects and subside virus replication (Kwon et al. 2019), supporting our virtual screening. Moreover, quercetin and its derivatives were previously confirmed to inhibit the SARS-CoV proteases of other coronaviruses including SARS-CoV proteases (3CLpro and PLpro) which share 97% homology to COVID-19 main protease (Bafna et al. 2020) as well as the Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) 3CLpro protease (Nguyen et al. 2012). Quercetin was also able to inhibit both enzymes in vitro in micromolar doses (Park et al. 2017); in general SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV share 82.45 and 69.58 percentage identity of their genome to SARS-CoV-2 (Kaur et al. 2020). The existence of this mixture of phytomedicines in bee products create a broad spectrum anti-COVID-19 cocktail that targets more than one crucial enzyme of the virus. Aside from the two enzymes we docked in our sample, other studies investigated the binding affinity of bee phytochemicals, especially propolis from various geographical origins, against other COVID-19 targets through virtual screening (Khalifa et al. 2020a; Ibrahim et al. 2020; Khalifa et al. 2020b; Khayrani et al. 2021; Güler et al. 2020). Taken all together, from our study and other studies, we spot the light on the protective and preventive role of honeybee products against COVID-19.

Conclusions

Molecular docking of honeybee products’ set of bioactive compounds against unique COVID-19 targets, including Mpro and RdRb enzymes, has distinguished promising compounds of natural origin with deep binding to the respective COVID-19 targets. P-coumaric acid, ellagic acid, kaempferol, and quercetin are the most promising compounds on COVID-19 active sites (RdRb and Mpro). These bioactive compounds were also found to have potential antiviral activity against the common cold human rhinovirus which is RNA virus like SARS-CoV-2. In summary and based on our theoretical studies supported by previous in vitro confirmatory studies, we recommend further in vivo investigations to assess the predicted affinity of the selected compounds against the novel coronavirus target enzymes.
  39 in total

1.  AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.

Authors:  Oleg Trott; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 3.  The current understanding and potential therapeutic options to combat COVID-19.

Authors:  Venkatesh Pooladanda; Sowjanya Thatikonda; Chandraiah Godugu
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 4.  Bioactivities of Phenolics by Focusing on Suppression of Chronic Diseases: A Review.

Authors:  Fereidoon Shahidi; JuDong Yeo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Flavonoid-mediated inhibition of SARS coronavirus 3C-like protease expressed in Pichia pastoris.

Authors:  Thi Thanh Hanh Nguyen; Hye-Jin Woo; Hee-Kyoung Kang; Van Dao Nguyen; Young-Min Kim; Do-Won Kim; Sul-Ah Ahn; Yongmei Xia; Doman Kim
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.461

6.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from COVID-19 virus.

Authors:  Yan Gao; Liming Yan; Yucen Huang; Fengjiang Liu; Yao Zhao; Lin Cao; Tao Wang; Qianqian Sun; Zhenhua Ming; Lianqi Zhang; Ji Ge; Litao Zheng; Ying Zhang; Haofeng Wang; Yan Zhu; Chen Zhu; Tianyu Hu; Tian Hua; Bing Zhang; Xiuna Yang; Jun Li; Haitao Yang; Zhijie Liu; Wenqing Xu; Luke W Guddat; Quan Wang; Zhiyong Lou; Zihe Rao
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Investigation of potential inhibitor properties of ethanolic propolis extracts against ACE-II receptors for COVID-19 treatment by molecular docking study.

Authors:  Halil Ibrahim Guler; Gizem Tatar; Oktay Yildiz; Ali Osman Belduz; Sevgi Kolayli
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.552

9.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  In silico prediction of SARS protease inhibitors by virtual high throughput screening.

Authors:  Dariusz Plewczynski; Marcin Hoffmann; Marcin von Grotthuss; Krzysztof Ginalski; Leszek Rychewski
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.817

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Propolis: An update on its chemistry and pharmacological applications.

Authors:  Rajib Hossain; Cristina Quispe; Rasel Ahmed Khan; Abu Saim Mohammad Saikat; Pranta Ray; Damira Ongalbek; Balakyz Yeskaliyeva; Divya Jain; Antonella Smeriglio; Domenico Trombetta; Roghayeh Kiani; Farzad Kobarfard; Naheed Mojgani; Parvaneh Saffarian; Seyed Abdulmajid Ayatollahi; Chandan Sarkar; Mohammad Torequl Islam; Dılhun Keriman; Arserim Uçar; Miquel Martorell; Antoni Sureda; Gianfranco Pintus; Monica Butnariu; Javad Sharifi-Rad; William C Cho
Journal:  Chin Med       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.546

2.  Modeling Kaempferol as a Potential Pharmacological Agent for COVID-19/PF Co-Occurrence Based on Bioinformatics and System Pharmacological Tools.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Yi-Zi Xie; Chen-Wen Peng; Kai-Nan Yao; Xue-Ying Lin; Shao-Feng Zhan; Hong-Fa Zhuang; Hui-Ting Huang; Xiao-Hong Liu; Xiu-Fang Huang; Hang Li
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 3.  Virtual screening of substances used in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection and analysis of compounds with known action on structurally similar proteins from other viruses.

Authors:  Paul Andrei Negru; Denisa Claudia Miculas; Tapan Behl; Alexa Florina Bungau; Ruxandra-Cristina Marin; Simona Gabriela Bungau
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 7.419

Review 4.  The antiviral and immunomodulatory activities of propolis: An update and future perspectives for respiratory diseases.

Authors:  Andrea Magnavacca; Enrico Sangiovanni; Giorgio Racagni; Mario Dell'Agli
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 12.388

Review 5.  Theoretical effectiveness of steam inhalation against SARS-CoV-2 infection: updates on clinical trials, mechanism of actions, and traditional approaches.

Authors:  Md Nafees Rahman Chowdhury; Yasin Arafat Alif; Safaet Alam; Nazim Uddin Emon; Fahmida Tasnim Richi; S M Neamul Kabir Zihad; Md Tohidul Islam Taki; Mohammad A Rashid
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-01-23

6.  In-silico screening of naturally derived phytochemicals against SARS-CoV Main protease.

Authors:  Islam Mostafa; Nashwa Hashem Mohamed; Basant Mohamed; Rafa Almeer; Mahmoud M A Abulmeaty; Simona G Bungau; Assem Mohamed El-Shazly; Galal Yahya
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.190

Review 7.  Potential effects of propolis and honey in COVID-19 prevention and treatment: A systematic review of in silico and clinical studies.

Authors:  Witoo Dilokthornsakul; Ramanya Kosiyaporn; Rattanamanee Wuttipongwaragon; Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
Journal:  J Integr Med       Date:  2022-01-31

8.  Characterization, in-silico, and in-vitro study of a new steroid derivative from Ophiocoma dentata as a potential treatment for COVID-19.

Authors:  Mohamed S M Abd El Hafez; Miral G AbdEl-Wahab; Mohamed G Seadawy; Mostafa F El-Hosseny; Osama Beskales; Ali Saber Ali Abdel-Hamid; Maha A El Demellawy; Doaa A Ghareeb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Natural products can be used in therapeutic management of COVID-19: Probable mechanistic insights.

Authors:  Sabeeha Ali; Manzar Alam; Fatima Khatoon; Urooj Fatima; Abdelbaset Mohamed Elasbali; Mohd Adnan; Asimul Islam; Md Imtaiyaz Hassan; Mejdi Snoussi; Vincenzo De Feo
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.529

10.  The inducing of caspase and Bcl-2 pathway with royal jelly decreases the muscle tissue damage exposed with fluoride in rats.

Authors:  Abdullah Aslan; Muhammed Ismail Can; Ozlem Gok; Seda Beyaz; Gozde Parlak; Ibrahim Hanifi Ozercan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.