Literature DB >> 33933856

Subcortical regions of the human visual system do not process faces holistically.

Rebeka C Almasi1, Marlene Behrmann2.   

Abstract

Face perception is considered to be evolutionarily adaptive and conserved across species. While subcortical visual brain areas are implicated in face perception based on existing evidence from phylogenetic and ontogenetic studies, whether these subcortical structures contribute to more complex visual computations such as the holistic processing (HP) of faces in humans is unknown. To address this issue, we used a well-established marker of HP, the composite face effect (CFE), with a group of adult human observers, and presented two sequential faces in a trial monocularly or interocularly using a Wheatstone stereoscope. HP refers to the finding that two identical top (or bottom) halves of a face are judged to be different when their task-irrelevant bottom (or top) halves belong to different faces. Because humans process faces holistically, they are unable to ignore the information from the irrelevant half of the composite face, and this is true to an even greater extent when the two halves of the faces are aligned compared with when they are misaligned ('Alignment effect'). The results revealed the HP effect and also uncovered the Alignment effect, a key marker of the CFE. The findings also indicated a monocular advantage, replicating the known subcortical contribution to face perception. There was, however, no statistically significant difference in the CFE when the images were presented in the monocular versus interocular conditions. These findings indicate that HP is not necessarily mediated by the subcortical visual pathway, and suggest that further investigation of cortical, rather than subcortical, structures might advance our understanding of HP and its role in face processing.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Composite face effect; Holistic processing; Neuroscience; Subcortical; Visual cognition

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33933856      PMCID: PMC8194320          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.682


  59 in total

1.  The many faces of configural processing.

Authors:  Daphne Maurer; Richard Le Grand; Catherine J. Mondloch
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Holistic perception of individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus as evidenced by the composite face illusion.

Authors:  Christine Schiltz; Laurence Dricot; Rainer Goebel; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Inverted faces are (eventually) processed holistically.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Michael L Mack; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Structure and function of parallel pathways in the primate early visual system.

Authors:  Edward M Callaway
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Individual differences in object recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Andrew J Tomarken; Mackenzie A Sunday; Timothy J Vickery; Kaitlin F Ryan; R Jackie Floyd; David Sheinberg; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Rapid fear detection relies on high spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Timo Stein; Kiley Seymour; Martin N Hebart; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-30

7.  Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Galia Avidan; Michal Tanzer; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Configural processing enables discrimination and categorization of face-like stimuli in honeybees.

Authors:  A Avarguès-Weber; G Portelli; J Benard; A Dyer; M Giurfa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Ocular dominance in human V1 demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R S Menon; S Ogawa; J P Strupp; K Uğurbil
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition.

Authors:  J Morton; M H Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.