Literature DB >> 20118310

Configural processing enables discrimination and categorization of face-like stimuli in honeybees.

A Avarguès-Weber1, G Portelli, J Benard, A Dyer, M Giurfa.   

Abstract

We studied whether honeybees can distinguish face-like configurations by using standardized stimuli commonly employed in primate and human visual research. Furthermore, we studied whether, irrespective of their capacity to distinguish between face-like stimuli, bees learn to classify visual stimuli built up of the same elements in face-like versus non-face-like categories. We showed that bees succeeded in discriminating both face-like and non-face-like stimuli and categorized appropriately novel stimuli in these two classes. To this end, they used configural information and not just isolated features or low-level cues. Bees looked for a specific configuration in which each feature had to be located in an appropriate spatial relationship with respect to the others, thus showing sensitivity for first-order relationships between features. Although faces are biologically irrelevant stimuli for bees, the fact that they were able to integrate visual features into complex representations suggests that face-like stimulus categorization can occur even in the absence of brain regions specialized in face processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20118310     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.039263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  34 in total

1.  Cognition: Your face looks familiar.

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Adrian Dyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Active touch in orthopteroid insects: behaviours, multisensory substrates and evolution.

Authors:  Christopher Comer; Yoshichika Baba
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Cross-modal interaction between visual and olfactory learning in Apis cerana.

Authors:  Li-Zhen Zhang; Shao-Wu Zhang; Zi-Long Wang; Wei-Yu Yan; Zhi-Jiang Zeng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  The effect of flower-like and non-flower-like visual properties on choice of unrewarding patterns by bumblebees.

Authors:  Levente L Orbán; Catherine M S Plowright
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-06-15

5.  Perception of contextual size illusions by honeybees in restricted and unrestricted viewing conditions.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Jair E Garcia; Devi Stuart-Fox; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Aversive reinforcement improves visual discrimination learning in free-flying honeybees.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Maria G de Brito Sanchez; Martin Giurfa; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Innate recognition of pheromone and food odors in moths: a common mechanism in the antennal lobe?

Authors:  Joshua P Martin; John G Hildebrand
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Honeybees can discriminate between Monet and Picasso paintings.

Authors:  Wen Wu; Antonio M Moreno; Jason M Tangen; Judith Reinhard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Wild non-eusocial bees learn a colour discrimination task in response to simulated predation events.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2021-06-21

10.  Different mechanisms underlie implicit visual statistical learning in honey bees and humans.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Valerie Finke; Márton Nagy; Tūnde Szabó; Daniele d'Amaro; Adrian G Dyer; József Fiser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.