| Literature DB >> 33933005 |
Wei Li1, Li Xiong1, Qiaoling Zhu1, Hong Lu2, Meiling Zhong3, Meirong Liang3, Wei Jiang3, Yanan Wang3, Wei Cheng4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is still a problem. This study aimed to explore the choice of these assessment methods.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical neoplasm; Computed tomography (CT); Retroperitoneal lymph node; Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33933005 PMCID: PMC8088051 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08208-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Flowchart of the study. CT, computed tomography; SCC-Ag, squamous cell carcinoma antigen; MAD minimum axial diameter; CILN, common iliac lymph node; PALN, para-aortic lymph node
Fig. 2Computed tomography (CT) scans and postoperative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of responding lymph node. a. Lymph node metastasis of adenocarcinoma (yellow arrow) comfirmed by H&E staining. b. Lymph node metastasis of adenosquamous carcinoma (yellow arrow) comfirmed by H&E staining. c. Lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma (yellow arrow) comfirmed by H&E staining. d. Normal lymph nodes. e. Measurement of MAD (≥ 1.0 cm) of the para-aortic lymph node. The yellow arrows showed the location of lymph node metastasis. The H&E staining result was positive. f. Measurement of MAD (0.5–0.9 cm) of the para-aortic lymph node. The yellow arrows showed the location of lymph node metastasis. The H&E staining result was negative
Comparison of positive rates of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis judged by differences in computed tomography (CT) lymph node minimum axial diameter (MAD)
| Group | Number | Pathological results | Percentage (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||||
| MAD ≥1.0 cm | 78 | 65 | 13 | 83.33 | 0.000 |
| 0.5 cm ≤ MAD < 1.0 cm | 82 | 22 | 60 | 26.82 | |
Fig. 3The critical values of computed tomography (CT) lymph node minimum axial diameter (MAD) (AUC = 0.782) and serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) (AUC = 0.717) levels in evaluating retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma
Efficacy of CT lymph node MAD and/or serum SCC-Ag in judging retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical squamous cell carcinom
| Group | Case | Pathological results | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity(%) | Specificity (%) | Youden index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||||||
| CT lymph node MAD ≥1.0 cm + SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL | 24 | 24 | 0 | 75.71* | 58.54 | 100.0* | 0.59* |
| CT lymph node MAD ≥1.0 cm | 40 | 33 | 7 | 72.09 | 66.0 | 80.56 | 0.47 |
| SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL | 39 | 30 | 9 | 71.43 | 73.17 | 68.97 | 0.42 |
CT computed tomography, MAD minimum axial diameter, SCC-Ag Squamous cell carcinoma antigen. *P < 0.05 vs. the CT lymph node MAD ≥1.0 cm group and SCC-Ag ≥ 5.2 ng/mL group
The relationship between clinical pathological features of advanced cervical cancer and CILN and/or PALN metastasis
| Factors | Case | Post-operation CILN and/or PALN | χ2value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||||
| Clinical stages | |||||
| IB2 stage | 12 | 5 | 7 | ||
| IIA2 - IIB stage | 51 | 15 | 36 | 0.700 | 0.705 |
| IIIA - IIIB stage | 33 | 10 | 23 | ||
| Pathological type | |||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 86 | 21 | 65 | 15.011 | 0.000 |
| Non-Squamous cell carcinoma | 10 | 9 | 1 | ||
| Tumor diameter (cm) | |||||
| ≤ 4 | 33 | 11 | 22 | 0.102 | 0.750 |
| > 4 | 63 | 19 | 44 | ||
| SCC-Ag (ng/mL) | |||||
| ≥ 5.2 | 39 | 14 | 25 | 3.653 | 0.056 |
| < 5.2 | 31 | 4 | 27 | ||
| CT indicates PLN MAD (cm)a | |||||
| < 0.5 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 1.315 | 0.518 |
| 0.5–0.9 | 34 | 5 | 29 | ||
| ≥ 1.0 | 36 | 9 | 27 | ||
| CT indicates PLN MAD 0.5–1.0 cm (number) a | |||||
| 1 | 24 | 4 | 20 | – | 1.000 |
| ≥ 2 | 10 | 1 | 9 | ||
| CT indicates PLN MAD ≥1.0 cm (number)a | |||||
| 1 | 26 | 3 | 23 | 9.046 | 0.003 |
| ≥ 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | ||
| CT indicates one PLN MAD ≥1.0 cm ± MAD 0.5–1.0 cm CILN and/or PALN | |||||
| Yes | 3 | 3 | 0 | _ | 0.005 |
| No | 26 | 3 | 23 | ||
CILN common iliac lymph node, PALN para-aortic lymph node, PLN pelvic lymph node, SCC-Ag squamous cell carcinoma antigen, CT computed tomography, MAD minimum axial diameter. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. a Did not include patients whose CT showed CILN and/or PALN MAD≥0.5 cm