Literature DB >> 24172103

Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in advanced cervical cancer: prognostic and therapeutic value.

Marta Del Pino1, Pere Fusté, Jaume Pahisa, Angels Rovirosa, Maria Jose Martínez-Serrano, Sergio Martínez-Román, Immaculada Alonso, Laura Vidal, Jaume Ordi, Aureli Torné.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clinical benefit of surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer has not yet been proved. The goal of this study was to analyze the prognostic and therapeutic value of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy with selective excision of suspicious pelvic nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study including 109 women treated in a single institution from 2000 to 2009. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage was IB2 in 12 women, IIB in 58 women, and IIIB in 39 women. None had suspicious para-aortic nodes by presurgical imaging evaluation. All patients underwent extraperitoneal para-aortic laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with selective excision of enlarged pelvic nodes and received pelvic radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Extended lumboaortic radiation therapy was added to patients with metastatic para-aortic nodes. The mean ± SD follow-up time was 43.1 ± 33.7 months.
RESULTS: Metastatic lymph nodes were identified in 23 (21.1%) of 109 patients in the para-aortic area and in 24 (53.3%) of 45 patients who underwent selective excision of pelvic nodes. Patients with nodal metastases had increased risk of mortality than those with negative nodes independently of the location (pelvic and/or para-aortic) of the metastases (hazard ratio, 4.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-12.16 for patients with pelvic metastases [P = 0.012]; and 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-10.09 for patients with para-aortic metastases [P = 0.010]). In the subset of women with para-aortic metastases treated by extended lumboaortic radiation therapy, neither the number of lymph nodes removed nor the number of positive nodes were associated with survival (P = 0.556 and P = 0.195, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy provides valuable information about mortality risk in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24172103     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  9 in total

Review 1.  Present status of sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ariel Gustavo Glickman; Sergio Valdes; Blanca Gil-Ibañez; Pilar Paredes; Karen Sttephannía Cortés; Aureli Angel Torné Blade
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-05-09

Review 2.  Does para-aortic irradiation reduce the risk of distant metastasis in advanced cervical cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Lucas Gomes Sapienza; Maria José Leite Gomes; Vinicius Fernando Calsavara; Mario M Leitao; Glauco Baiocchi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Initial experience of laparoscopic pelvic exenteration and comparison with conventional open surgery.

Authors:  Keisuke Uehara; Hayato Nakamura; Yasushi Yoshino; Atsuki Arimoto; Takehiro Kato; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tomoki Ebata; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  The impact of para-aortic lymph node irradiation on disease-free survival in patients with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leslie J H Bukkems; Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; Femke van der Leij; Max Peters; Cornelis G Gerestein; Ronald P Zweemer; Peter S N van Rossum
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30

5.  Prognostic Value and Therapeutic Implication of Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Paraaortic Staging in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Spanish Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Berta Díaz-Feijoo; Aureli Torné; Álvaro Tejerizo; Virginia Benito; Alicia Hernández; Rubén Ruiz; Santiago Domingo; Rocío Luna-Guibourg; Antonio Llueca; Pluvio Coronado; Juan Gilabert-Estelles; Vicente Bebia; Blanca Gil-Ibáñez; Antonio Gil-Moreno
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Feasibility of radical hysterectomy in women with FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer: an observation study of 10-year experience in a tertiary center.

Authors:  Lei Yuan; Jiaqi Guo; Xiaochun Zhang; Mo Chen; Congjian Xu; Liangqing Yao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The analysis of the long-term outcomes in elderly women treated for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Krzysztof Koper; Konrad Dziobek; Roman Makarewicz; Joanna Terlikiewicz; Magdalena Dutsch-Wicherek
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-10-31

8.  Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Wei Li; Li Xiong; Qiaoling Zhu; Hong Lu; Meiling Zhong; Meirong Liang; Wei Jiang; Yanan Wang; Wei Cheng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Robotic Staging of Cervical Cancer With Simultaneous Detection of Primary Pelvic and Secondary Para-Aortic Sentinel Lymph Nodes: Reproducibility in a First Case Series.

Authors:  Philippe Van Trappen; Eveline De Cuypere; Nele Claes; Sarah Roels
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.