Literature DB >> 33932167

Understanding PI-QUAL for prostate MRI quality: a practical primer for radiologists.

Francesco Giganti1,2, Alex Kirkham3, Veeru Kasivisvanathan4,5, Marianthi-Vasiliki Papoutsaki6, Shonit Punwani3,6, Mark Emberton4,5, Caroline M Moore4,5, Clare Allen3.   

Abstract

Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of high diagnostic quality is a key determinant for either detection or exclusion of prostate cancer. Adequate high spatial resolution on T2-weighted imaging, good diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences of high signal-to-noise ratio are the prerequisite for a high-quality MRI study of the prostate. The Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score was created to assess the diagnostic quality of a scan against a set of objective criteria as per Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System recommendations, together with criteria obtained from the image. The PI-QUAL score is a 1-to-5 scale where a score of 1 indicates that all MR sequences (T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences) are below the minimum standard of diagnostic quality, a score of 3 means that the scan is of sufficient diagnostic quality, and a score of 5 implies that all three sequences are of optimal diagnostic quality. The purpose of this educational review is to provide a practical guide to assess the quality of prostate MRI using PI-QUAL and to familiarise the radiologist and all those involved in prostate MRI with this scoring system. A variety of images are also presented to demonstrate the difference between suboptimal and good prostate MR scans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Image quality; Magnetic resonance imaging; PI-QUAL score; Prostate cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 33932167     DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-00996-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insights Imaging        ISSN: 1869-4101


  2 in total

1.  Influence of Enema and Dietary Restrictions on Prostate MR Image Quality: A Multireader Study.

Authors:  Andrei S Purysko; Nathan Mielke; Jennifer Bullen; Douglas Nachand; Alain Rizk; Erica Stevens; Ryan D Ward; Eric A Klein; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Justin M Ream
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Measuring the Quality of Diagnostic Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Urologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Gianluca Giannarini; Claudio Valotto; Rossano Girometti; Fabrizio Dal Moro; Alberto Briganti; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 20.096

  2 in total
  9 in total

1.  3D Isotropic Super-resolution Prostate MRI Using Generative Adversarial Networks and Unpaired Multiplane Slices.

Authors:  Yucheng Liu; Yulin Liu; Rami Vanguri; Daniel Litwiller; Michael Liu; Hao-Yun Hsu; Richard Ha; Hiram Shaish; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.903

Review 2.  Quality checkpoints in the MRI-directed prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.

Authors:  Tristan Barrett; Maarten de Rooij; Francesco Giganti; Clare Allen; Jelle O Barentsz; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 16.430

3.  Promoting the use of the PI-QUAL score for prostate MRI quality: results from the ESOR Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis teaching fellowship.

Authors:  Francesco Giganti; Alexander P Cole; Fiona M Fennessy; Timothy Clinton; Pedro Lopes Da Frota Moreira; Mariana Costa Bernardes; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Deepa Krishnaswamy; Andriy Fedorov; Daniel A Wollin; Bjoern Langbein; Nicola Frego; Muhieddine Labban; Joy S Badaoui; Steven L Chang; Logan G Briggs; Junichi Tokuda; Alessandro Ambrosi; Alex Kirkham; Mark Emberton; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Caroline M Moore; Clare Allen; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 7.034

4.  Considerations for artificial intelligence clinical impact in oncologic imaging: an AI4HI position paper.

Authors:  Luis Marti-Bonmati; Dow-Mu Koh; Katrine Riklund; Maciej Bobowicz; Yiannis Roussakis; Joan C Vilanova; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jordi Rimola; Pedro Mallol; Gloria Ribas; Ana Miguel; Manolis Tsiknakis; Karim Lekadir; Gianna Tsakou
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-05-10

5.  PI-QUAL v.1: the first step towards good-quality prostate MRI.

Authors:  Maarten de Rooij; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 7.034

6.  Results from a PI-RADS-based MRI-directed diagnostic pathway for biopsy-naive patients in a non-university hospital.

Authors:  Jeroen S Reijnen; Jon B Marthinsen; Alf O Tysland; Christoph Müller; Irina Schönhardt; Erlend Andersen; Therese Seierstad; Knut H Hole
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-08-20

Review 7.  Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Genitourinary System.

Authors:  Thomas De Perrot; Christine Sadjo Zoua; Carl G Glessgen; Diomidis Botsikas; Lena Berchtold; Rares Salomir; Sophie De Seigneux; Harriet C Thoeny; Jean-Paul Vallée
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Improving workflow in prostate MRI: AI-based decision-making on biparametric or multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Andreas M Hötker; Raffaele Da Mutten; Anja Tiessen; Ender Konukoglu; Olivio F Donati
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-08-09

9.  Inter-reader agreement of the PI-QUAL score for prostate MRI quality in the NeuroSAFE PROOF trial.

Authors:  Francesco Giganti; Eoin Dinneen; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Aiman Haider; Alex Freeman; Alex Kirkham; Shonit Punwani; Mark Emberton; Greg Shaw; Caroline M Moore; Clare Allen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.