Literature DB >> 33931790

FDA-Industry Scientific Exchange on assessing quantitative systems pharmacology models in clinical drug development: a meeting report, summary of challenges/gaps, and future perspective.

Jane P F Bai1, Brian J Schmidt2, Kapil G Gadkar3,4, Valeriu Damian5, Justin C Earp6, Christina Friedrich7, Piet H van der Graaf8,9, Rajanikanth Madabushi6, Cynthia J Musante10, Kunal Naik6, Mark Rogge11, Hao Zhu6.   

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry is actively applying quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) to make internal decisions and guide drug development. To facilitate the eventual development of a common framework for assessing the credibility of QSP models for clinical drug development, scientists from US Food and Drug Administration and the pharmaceutical industry organized a full-day virtual Scientific Exchange on July 1, 2020. An assessment form was used to ensure consistency in the evaluation process. Among the cases presented, QSP was applied to various therapeutic areas. Applications mostly focused on phase 2 dose selection. Model transparency, including details on expert knowledge and data used for model development, was identified as a major factor for robust model assessment. The case studies demonstrated some commonalities in the workflow of QSP model development, calibration, and validation but differ in the size, scope, and complexity of QSP models, in the acceptance criteria for model calibration and validation, and in the algorithms/approaches used for creating virtual patient populations. Though efforts are being made to build the credibility of QSP models and the confidence is increasing in applying QSP for internal decisions at the clinical stages of drug development, there are still many challenges facing QSP application to late stage drug development. The QSP community needs a strategic plan that includes the ability and flexibility to Adapt, to establish Common expectations for model Credibility needed to inform drug Labeling and patient care, and to AIM to achieve the goal (ACCLAIM).

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug development; model assessment; model calibration and validation; pharmacodynamics; quantitative systems pharmacology

Year:  2021        PMID: 33931790     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-021-00585-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  8 in total

1.  Variability and uncertainty: interpretation and usage of pharmacometric simulations and intervals.

Authors:  Chuanpu Hu
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.410

2.  Towards a comprehensive assessment of QSP models: what would it take?

Authors:  Ioannis P Androulakis
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.410

3.  Dynamics of tumor-associated macrophages in a quantitative systems pharmacology model of immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Hanwen Wang; Chen Zhao; Cesar A Santa-Maria; Leisha A Emens; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 4.  Review of applications and challenges of quantitative systems pharmacology modeling and machine learning for heart failure.

Authors:  Limei Cheng; Yuchi Qiu; Brian J Schmidt; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Understanding virtual patients efficiently and rigorously by combining machine learning with dynamical modelling.

Authors:  Tongli Zhang; John J Tyson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Solving the Evidence Interpretability Crisis in Health Technology Assessment: A Role for Mechanistic Models?

Authors:  Eulalie Courcelles; Jean-Pierre Boissel; Jacques Massol; Ingrid Klingmann; Riad Kahoul; Marc Hommel; Emmanuel Pham; Alexander Kulesza
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2022-02-24

7.  Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey.

Authors:  Jason R Chan; Richard Allen; Britton Boras; Antonio Cabal; Valeriu Damian; Francis D Gibbons; Abhishek Gulati; Iraj Hosseini; Jeffrey D Kearns; Ryuta Saito; Lourdes Cucurull-Sanchez; Jangir Selimkhanov; Andrew M Stein; Kenichi Umehara; Guanyu Wang; Weirong Wang; Susana Neves-Zaph
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.410

8.  CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology - Inception, Maturation, and Future Vision.

Authors:  Karen Rowland Yeo; Stefanie Hennig; Sriram Krishnaswami; Natasha Strydom; Vivaswath S Ayyar; Jonathan French; Vikram Sinha; Eric Sobie; Ping Zhao; Lena E Friberg; France Mentré
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.