Literature DB >> 33930488

Ventilation design conditions associated with airborne bacteria levels within the wound area during surgical procedures: a systematic review.

A Aganovic1, G Cao2, T Fecer3, B Ljungqvist4, B Lytsy5, A Radtke6, B Reinmüller4, R Traversari7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Without confirmation of the ventilation design conditions (typology and airflow rate), the common practice of identifying unidirectional airflow (UDAF) systems as equivalent to ultra-clean air ventilation systems may be misleading, but also any claims about the ineffectiveness of UDAF systems should be doubted. The aim of this review was to assess and compare ventilation system design conditions for which ultra-clean air (mean <10 cfu/m3) within 50 cm from the wound has been reported. Six medical databases were systematically searched to identify and select studies reporting intraoperative airborne levels expressed as cfu/m3 close to the wound site, and ventilation system design conditions. Available data on confounding factors such as the number of persons present in the operating room, number of door openings, and clothing material were also included. Predictors for achieving mean airborne bacteria levels within <10 cfu/m3 were identified using a penalized multivariate logistic regression model. Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. UDAF systems considered had significantly higher air volume flows compared with turbulent ventilation (TV) systems considered. Ultra-clean environments were reported in all UDAF-ventilated (N = 7) rooms compared with four of 11 operating rooms equipped with TV. On multivariate analysis, the total number of air exchange rates (P=0.019; odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.96) and type of clothing material (P=0.031; OR 95% CI: 0.01-0.71) were significantly associated with achieving mean levels of airborne bacteria <10 cfu/m3. High-volume UDAF systems complying with DIN 1946-4:2008 standards for the airflow rate and ceiling diffuser size unconditionally achieve ultra-clean air close to the wound site. In conclusion, the studied articles demonstrate that high-volume UDAF systems perform as ultra-clean air systems and are superior to TV systems in reducing airborne bacteria levels close to the wound site.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intraoperative airborne contamination; Operating room; Ultra-clean air; Unidirectional airflow (UDAF); Ventilation system

Year:  2021        PMID: 33930488     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  2 in total

1.  Allograft contamination during suture preparation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Chenliang Wu; Xiuyuan Zhang; Yi Qiao; Jiebo Chen; Wei Su; Junjie Xu; Zipeng Ye; Jia Jiang; Caiqi Xu; Guoming Xie; Jinzhong Zhao; Song Zhao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Current Status and Factors Associated with Clean Operating Rooms: A Survey of Hospitals in China.

Authors:  Ye Lu; Ran Cai; Zhongyi Xie; Xiaodong Gao; Xiaoqiang Huang; Ji Xu; Ye Li; Guoqing Hu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.822

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.