Ali Alijamaat1, Alireza NikravanShalmani2, Peyman Bayat1. 1. Department of Computer Engineering, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran. 2. Department of Computer Engineering, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. nikravan@kiau.ac.ir.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to segment multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images, in which lesions in different sizes are segmented with appropriate accuracy. Automated segmentation as a powerful tool can assist professionals to increase the accuracy of disease diagnosis and its level of progression. METHODS: We present a deep neural network based on the U-Net architecture in which wavelet transform-based pooling replaces max pooling. In the first part of the network, the wavelet transform is used, and in the second part, it's inverse. In addition to decomposing the input image and reducing its size, the wavelet transform highlights sharp changes in the image and better describes local features. This transform has the multi-resolution characteristic, so its use provides improvement in the detection of lesions of different sizes and segmentation. RESULTS: The results of this study show that the proposed method has a better Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) value compared to the max pooling and average pooling methods. CONCLUSION: The proposed method has better results for segmenting MS lesions of different sizes in MRI images than the max and average pooling methods and other methods studied.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to segment multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images, in which lesions in different sizes are segmented with appropriate accuracy. Automated segmentation as a powerful tool can assist professionals to increase the accuracy of disease diagnosis and its level of progression. METHODS: We present a deep neural network based on the U-Net architecture in which wavelet transform-based pooling replaces max pooling. In the first part of the network, the wavelet transform is used, and in the second part, it's inverse. In addition to decomposing the input image and reducing its size, the wavelet transform highlights sharp changes in the image and better describes local features. This transform has the multi-resolution characteristic, so its use provides improvement in the detection of lesions of different sizes and segmentation. RESULTS: The results of this study show that the proposed method has a better Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) value compared to the max pooling and average pooling methods. CONCLUSION: The proposed method has better results for segmenting MS lesions of different sizes in MRI images than the max and average pooling methods and other methods studied.
Entities:
Keywords:
Deep learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple sclerosis; U-Net neural network; Wavelet
Authors: Alan J Thompson; Brenda L Banwell; Frederik Barkhof; William M Carroll; Timothy Coetzee; Giancarlo Comi; Jorge Correale; Franz Fazekas; Massimo Filippi; Mark S Freedman; Kazuo Fujihara; Steven L Galetta; Hans Peter Hartung; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Ruth Ann Marrie; Aaron E Miller; David H Miller; Xavier Montalban; Ellen M Mowry; Per Soelberg Sorensen; Mar Tintoré; Anthony L Traboulsee; Maria Trojano; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Sandra Vukusic; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian G Weinshenker; Stephen C Reingold; Jeffrey A Cohen Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Shahab Aslani; Michael Dayan; Loredana Storelli; Massimo Filippi; Vittorio Murino; Maria A Rocca; Diego Sona Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Nora N Sommer; Tobias Saam; Eva Coppenrath; Hendrik Kooijman; Tania Kümpfel; Maximilian Patzig; Sebastian E Beyer; Wieland H Sommer; Maximilian F Reiser; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Karla M Treitl Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Brenda Banwell; Michel Clanet; Jeffrey A Cohen; Massimo Filippi; Kazuo Fujihara; Eva Havrdova; Michael Hutchinson; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Saurabh Jain; Diana M Sima; Annemie Ribbens; Melissa Cambron; Anke Maertens; Wim Van Hecke; Johan De Mey; Frederik Barkhof; Martijn D Steenwijk; Marita Daams; Frederik Maes; Sabine Van Huffel; Hugo Vrenken; Dirk Smeets Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Massimo Filippi; Maria A Rocca; Olga Ciccarelli; Nicola De Stefano; Nikos Evangelou; Ludwig Kappos; Alex Rovira; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Mar Tintorè; Jette L Frederiksen; Claudio Gasperini; Jacqueline Palace; Daniel S Reich; Brenda Banwell; Xavier Montalban; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 44.182