Literature DB >> 33928458

Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Guoqiang Ma1, Chaoan Wu2, Miaoting Shao1.   

Abstract

Several authors have suggested that implants can be placed simultaneously with onlay bone grafts without affecting outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to answer the following clinical questions: (1) What are the outcomes of implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay bone grafts? And (2) is there a difference in outcomes between simultaneous vs delayed placement of implants with autogenous onlay bone grafts? Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched up to 15 November 2020. Data on implant survival was extracted from all the included studies (single arm and comparative) to calculate point estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird meta-analysis model. We also compared implant survival rates between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with data from comparative studies. Nineteen studies were included. Five of them compared simultaneous and delayed placement of implants. Dividing the studies based on follow-up duration, the pooled survival of implant placed simultaneously with onlay grafts after <2.5 years of follow-up was 93.1% (95% CI 82.6 to 97.4%) and after 2.5-5 years was 86% (95% CI 78.6 to 91.1%). Implant survival was found to be 85.8% (95% CI 79.6 to 90.3%) with iliac crest grafts and 95.7% (95% CI 83.9 to 93.0%) with intra-oral grafts. Our results indicated no statistically significant difference in implant survival between simultaneous and delayed placement (OR 0.43, 95% 0.07, 2.49, I2=59.04%). Data on implant success and bone loss were limited. Data indicates that implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay grafts have a survival rate of 93.1% and 86% after a follow-up of <2.5 years and 2.5-5years respectively. A limited number of studies indicate no significant difference in implant survival between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with onlay bone grafts. There is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing simultaneous and delayed implant placement to provide robust evidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Block grafts; Iliac graft; Immediate placement; Ridge augmentation; Survival

Year:  2021        PMID: 33928458     DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00311-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Implant Dent        ISSN: 2198-4034


  28 in total

Review 1.  Success rate of dental implants inserted in horizontal and vertical guided bone regenerated areas: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Clementini; A Morlupi; L Canullo; C Agrestini; A Barlattani
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 2.  Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review.

Authors:  V Moraschini; L A da C Poubel; V F Ferreira; E dos S P Barboza
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 3.  Bone Augmentation Techniques for Horizontal and Vertical Alveolar Ridge Deficiency in Oral Implantology.

Authors:  Len Tolstunov; John F Eric Hamrick; Vishtasb Broumand; Dekel Shilo; Adi Rachmiel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 4.  Immediate versus delayed positioning of dental implants in guided bone regeneration or onlay graft regenerated areas: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Clementini; A Morlupi; C Agrestini; A Barlattani
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 5.  Human Studies of Vertical and Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Comparing Different Types of Bone Graft Materials: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Suraj Chavda; Liran Levin
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 6.  The Fate of Lateral Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Basel Elnayef; Cristina Porta; Fernando Suárez-López Del Amo; Lorenzo Mordini; Jordi Gargallo-Albiol; Federico Hernández-Alfaro
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Localized lateral alveolar ridge augmentation with block bone grafts: simultaneous versus delayed implant placement: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study.

Authors:  Maria Peñarrocha-Diago; Amparo Aloy-Prósper; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Jose Luis Calvo-Guirado; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?

Authors:  Tara L Aghaloo; Peter K Moy
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant treatments of the vertical bone atrophy: A systematic review.

Authors:  J Toledano-Serrabona; M-Á Sánchez-Garcés; A Sánchez-Torres; C Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2019-01-01

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.