Literature DB >> 23748318

Localized lateral alveolar ridge augmentation with block bone grafts: simultaneous versus delayed implant placement: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study.

Maria Peñarrocha-Diago1, Amparo Aloy-Prósper, David Peñarrocha-Oltra, Jose Luis Calvo-Guirado, Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the 1-year outcome of implant therapy involving localized lateral alveolar ridge augmentation with block bone grafts, and to compare outcomes of implants inserted simultaneously with grafting or after a healing period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutively treated patients undergoing alveolar ridge augmentation with autogenous intraoral block grafts before or simultaneous with implant placement between 2005 and 2010 in the Oral Surgery Unit of the University of Valencia were included. The selection of procedure (simultaneous vs delayed implant placement, donor site) was based upon the criterion of the surgeon and thorough evaluation of each patient. All grafts were obtained with piezosurgery. Complications related to augmentation, implant survival, implant success, and peri-implant marginal bone loss were assessed.
RESULTS: Forty-two patients were included; 45 sites were augmented and 71 implants were inserted (33 delayed and 38 simultaneously). Complications (temporary paresthesia, wound dehiscence with bone graft exposure, and exposure of osteosynthesis screw) occurred after bone harvesting in nine patients; four were in the simultaneous group and five were in the delayed group. Six grafts were not successful; four were lost and two provided insufficient bone (after resorption) for ideal implant placement. The implant survival rate was 98.5% (100% for simultaneous and 96.9% for delayed implants) and the implant success rate was 92.9% (89.5% for simultaneous and 96.9% for delayed implants). Average marginal bone loss 1 year after loading was significantly higher for simultaneously placed implants (0.69 ± 0.67 mm) than for delayed implants (0.20 ± 0.50 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: In lateral bone atrophy, block bone grafts provided sufficient bone for implant therapy, with few complications. Both simultaneous and delayed implant placement yielded high implant survival and success rates. Average marginal bone loss was significantly higher around simultaneously inserted implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23748318     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  13 in total

1.  Efficacy of autogenous teeth for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ausra Ramanauskaite; D Sahin; R Sader; J Becker; F Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Acellular mineralized allogenic block bone graft does not remodel during the 10 weeks following concurrent implant placement in a rabbit femoral model.

Authors:  D Joshua Cohen; Kayla M Scott; Aniket N Kulkarni; Jennifer S Wayne; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 3.  The outcome of intraoral onlay block bone grafts on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amparo Aloy-Prósper; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Maria Peñarrocha-Diago; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-03-01

Review 4.  Guided Bone Regeneration for the Reconstruction of Alveolar Bone Defects.

Authors:  Arash Khojasteh; Lida Kheiri; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Vahid Khoshkam
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec

5.  Comparison of alveolar ridge splitting and autogenous onlay bone grafting to enable implant placement in patients with atrophic jaw bones.

Authors:  Gokhan Gurler; Cagri Delilbasi; Hasan Garip; Sukran Tufekcioglu
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Influence of platelet rich fibrin on post-extraction socket healing: A clinical and radiographic study.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdullah Alzahrani; Afraa Murriky; Sami Shafik
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2017-08-02

7.  Use of buccal fat pad to repair post-extraction peri-implant bone defects in the posterior maxilla. A preliminary prospective study.

Authors:  María Peñarrocha-Diago; Rocío Alonso-González; Amparo Aloy-Prósper; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Fabio Camacho; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-11-01

Review 8.  Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Saeed Reza Motamedian; Moein Khojaste; Arash Khojasteh
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun

Review 9.  Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Allogeneic Bone Block Graft Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Daniel Deluiz; Eduardo Muniz Barretto Tinoco
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2020-03-31

Review 10.  Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Jonas Peter Becktor
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2019-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.