| Literature DB >> 33928157 |
Botang Guo1, Binbin Qiang2, Jiawei Zhou1, Xiuxian Yang1, Xiaohui Qiu1, Zhengxue Qiao1, Yanjie Yang1, Depin Cao2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To explore the relationship between achievement motivation and job performance among physicians, this study investigated the impacts of different personality traits on job performance among the physicians.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33928157 PMCID: PMC8049801 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6646980
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Participants'characteristics and the distribution of job performance.
| Variables | Group |
| Job performance ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 770 (51.0) | 126.16 ± 19.04 | -1.499 | 0.134 | |
| Female | 739 (49.0) | 127.56 ± 17.28 | |||
| Age | |||||
| ≤30 | 439 (29.1) | 124.14 ± 17.76 | 10.930 | 0.000 | |
| 31-40 | 685 (45.4) | 126.78 ± 17.57 | |||
| ≥41 | 385 (25.5) | 130.04 ± 19.33 | |||
| Marital status | |||||
| Single | 394 (26.1) | 123.84 ± 18.16 | 15.495 | 0.000 | |
| Married/cohabiting | 1051 (69.6) | 128.44 ± 17.83 | |||
| Divorced/separated/widowed | 64 (4.3) | 119.09 ± 20.36 | |||
| Education | |||||
| Junior college or lower | 29 (1.9) | 117.04 ± 17.52 | 4.574 | 0.010 | |
| College | 328 (21.7) | 127.68 ± 18.90 | |||
| Postgraduate or above | 1152 (76.4) | 126.86 ± 17.97 | |||
| Professional qualifications | |||||
| Primary title | 264 (17.5) | 124.80 ± 17.65 | 7.723 | 0.000 | |
| Intermediate title | 493 (32.7) | 127.16 ± 18.32 | |||
| Senior vice title | 378 (25.1) | 126.97 ± 17.81 | |||
| Senior title | 216 (14.3) | 132.38 ± 18.09 | |||
| None | 158 (10.4) | 121.42 ± 17.93 | |||
Means, standard deviations, and correlations for all study variables (N = 1509).
| Variable |
| SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Age | 36.67 | 7.78 | 1 | ||||||||
| 2. Achievement motivation | 3.03 | 10.270 | .019 | 1 | |||||||
| 3. Organizational commitment | 63.32 | 10.751 | .061∗ | .429∗∗ | 1 | ||||||
| 4. Neuroticism | 15.23 | 3.251 | -.046 | .200∗∗ | .706∗∗ | 1 | |||||
| 5. Extraversion | 16.40 | 3.247 | -.032 | .179∗∗ | .135∗∗ | -.255∗∗ | 1 | ||||
| 6. Openness | 18.66 | 3.580 | -.002 | .443∗∗ | .597∗∗ | .117∗∗ | .161∗∗ | 1 | |||
| 7. Agreeableness | 18.49 | 4.062 | -.043 | .225∗∗ | .109∗∗ | .019 | .637∗∗ | .257∗∗ | 1 | ||
| 8. Conscientiousness | 18.00 | 3.918 | -.015 | .233∗∗ | .110∗∗ | .003 | .574∗∗ | .232∗∗ | .808∗∗ | 1 | |
| 9. Job performance | 126.72 | 18.160 | .138∗∗ | .410∗∗ | .483∗∗ | .187∗∗ | .232∗∗ | .574∗∗ | .388∗∗ | .384∗∗ | 1 |
Conditional process analysis.
|
| SE |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mediator variable model for predicting | ||||
| Organizational commitment | ||||
| Constant | 61.98 | 0.26 | 237.93 | 0.000 |
| Achievement motivation | 0.45 | 0.02 | 18.21 | 0.000 |
| Dependent variable model for predicting | ||||
| Job performance | ||||
| Constant | 84.70 | 2.59 | 32.73 | 0.000 |
| Achievement motivation | 0.43 | 0.04 | 9.90 | 0.000 |
| Organizational commitment | 0.64 | 0.41 | 15.63 | 0.000 |
| Agreeableness | 0.36 | 0.04 | 9.03 | 0.000 |
| Organizational commitment×agreeableness | -0.07 | 0.01 | -7.91 | 0.000 |
| Conscientiousness | 0.35 | 0.04 | 8.70 | 0.000 |
| Organizational commitment×conscientiousness | -0.06 | 0.01 | -6.38 | 0.000 |
Figure 1Moderating effect. Agreeableness dimension and conscientiousness dimension moderate the relationship between organizational commitment and job performance among Chinese physicians.
Figure 2Conditional indirect effect at specific levels of the moderator when treating organizational commitment as a mediator (N = 1509).
Figure 3(a) The moderated mediation model applied in this study. (b) The final moderated mediation model. The link associating the achievement motivation and organizational commitment with job performance is moderated by personality traits.