| Literature DB >> 27479002 |
Jiawei Zhou1, Yanjie Yang1, Xiaohui Qiu1, Xiuxian Yang1, Hui Pan2, Bo Ban3, Zhengxue Qiao1, Lin Wang1, Wenbo Wang1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The main goal of this research was to investigate the complex relationships among coping styles, personality, burnout, and anxiety using a moderated mediation analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27479002 PMCID: PMC4968847 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The moderated mediation model applied in this study.
The influence of burnout on anxiety symptoms. The effect of burnout is mediated by coping styles. Personality traits further modify the coping process.
Participants’ characteristics and the distribution of anxiety symptoms.
| Groups | N(%) | Anxiety symptoms (M±SD) | F/t | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.615 | .069 | |||
| Male | 475(41.82%) | 45.17(13.60) | |||
| Female | 654(58.17%) | 44.68(12.94) | |||
| Age (years) | 11.156 | .000 | |||
| ≤30 | 168 | 44.73(13.06) | |||
| 31–40 | 560 | 46.62(13.51) | |||
| >40 | 394 | 42.55(12.53) | |||
| Marital status | 1.407 | .245 | |||
| Single | 157(14.12%) | 45.92(13.83) | |||
| Married/cohabiting | 934(50%) | 44.62(13.17) | |||
| Divorced/separated/widowed | 38(3.3%) | 47.50(11.09) | |||
| Education | 4.096 | .017 | |||
| Junior college | 142(12.97%) | 44.57(13.56) | |||
| College | 573(50.62%) | 45.94(13.68) | |||
| Postgraduate or above | 414(36.41%) | 43.52(12.28) | |||
| Night shift | 5.463 | .048 | |||
| Yes | 652(57.82%) | 46.73(13.43) | |||
| No | 477(42.18%) | 42.35(12.47) | |||
| Professional qualifications | 8.695 | .000 | |||
| Primary title | 229(20.34%) | 47.16(14.71) | |||
| Intermediate title | 362(32.06%) | 46.59(13.24) | |||
| Senior vice title | 264(23.27%) | 44.04(12.07) | |||
| Senior title | 184(16.34%) | 40.68(12.12) | |||
| None | 90(8.00%) | 43.29(12.06) |
Correlations between anxiety symptoms, burnout, coping styles, and personality traits (N = 1129).
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Anxiety symptoms | 1.00 | ||||||
| 2. Burnout level | .45 | 1.00 | |||||
| 3. Positive coping | –.36 | –.33 | 1.00 | ||||
| 4. Negative coping | .46 | .34 | –.32 | 1.00 | |||
| 5. Extraversion | .06 | –.01 | .06 | –.01 | 1.00 | ||
| 6. Neuroticism | .16 | .10 | –.08 | .12 | –.34 | 1.00 | |
| 7. Psychoticism | –.06 | –.01 | .03 | –.00 | –.43 | .39 | 1.00 |
| Mean | 44.88 | 1.04 | 34.99 | 27.47 | 6.40 | 5.88 | 5.09 |
| Standard deviation | 13.20 | .92 | 7.15 | 7.83 | 3.23 | 3.68 | 4.05 |
Note:
** p < 0.01,
* p < 0.05.
Mediation analysis (N = 1129).
| Variables | B | SE | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burnout level→Positive coping | –2.53 | .22 | –11.56 | <.001 |
| Burnout level→Negative coping | 2.89 | .24 | 12.11 | <.001 |
| Positive coping→Anxiety symptoms | –.42 | .05 | –8.33 | <.001 |
| Negative coping→Anxiety symptoms | .58 | .04 | 13.04 | <.001 |
| Burnout level→Anxiety symptoms | 6.533 | .38 | 17.24 | <.001 |
Bootstrap results for indirect effect (N = 1129).
| Bootstrap results for indirect effect | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Effect | SE | LL 95% CI | UL 95% CI |
| Positive coping | 1.0617 | .1784 | .7315 | 1.4319 |
| Negative coping | 1.6711 | .1955 | 1.3141 | 2.0791 |
Moderated mediation analysis when treating positive coping as a mediator (N = 1129).
| Outcome variable: anxiety symptoms | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | B | SE | t | p |
| Burnout | 5.25 | .39 | 13.64 | .000 |
| E dimension | .45 | .13 | 3.62 | .000 |
| N dimension | .67 | .11 | 6.07 | .000 |
| P dimension | –.18 | .11 | –1.72 | .085 |
| Positive coping (POC) | –.34 | .09 | –3.85 | .000 |
| POC×E | .04 | .02 | 2.65 | .008 |
| POC×N | .01 | .01 | 1.05 | .295 |
| POC×P | –.01 | .02 | –.81 | .417 |
| R2 | .314 | |||
Moderated mediation analysis when treating negative coping as a mediator (N = 1129).
| Outcome variable: anxiety symptoms | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | B | SE | t | p |
| Burnout | 4.70 | .37 | 12.59 | .000 |
| E dimension | .35 | .12 | 2.99 | .003 |
| N dimension | .59 | .12 | 5.02 | .000 |
| P dimension | –.24 | .10 | –2.28 | .023 |
| Negative coping (NEC) | .55 | .08 | 6.76 | .000 |
| NEC×E | –.01 | .01 | –.40 | .692 |
| NEC×N | .00 | .01 | –.06 | .952 |
| NEC×P | .02 | .01 | 1.14 | .255 |
| R2 | .361 | |||
Fig 2Moderating effect.
E dimension moderates the relationship between positive coping and anxiety symptoms among Chinese physicians.
Conditional indirect effect at specific levels of the moderator when treating positive coping as a mediator (N = 1129).
| Moderator: level of E | Indirect effect | SE | LL 95% CI | UL 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 SD above the mean | 1.2815 | .2267 | .8826 | 1.7602 |
| Mean | 1.0856 | .1781 | .7696 | 1.4867 |
| 1 SD below the mean | .8897 | .2106 | .4981 | 1.3344 |
Fig 3The final moderated mediation model.
The link associating the burnout and positive coping with anxiety is moderated by personality traits.