| Literature DB >> 33927690 |
Muhammad Ishaq1, Duyen Tran1, Yijia Wu1, Krzysztof Nowak1, Bianca J Deans2, Joycelin Tan Zhu Xin3, Hui Lin Loh3, Wen Ying Ng3, Chin Wen Yee3, Benjamin Southam4, Silvia Vicenzi1, Cameron Randall1, Cheng Yang1, Ee Tan1, Manideepika Pasupuleti1, Avneet Kaur Grewal1, Tauseef Ahmad4, Madhur Shastri4, Carmelo Vicario5, Maurizio Ronci6, Mariachiara Zuccarini6, Martin Bleasel1, Paul Scowen7, William Raffaeli8, Gianvicenzo D'Andrea8, Dinesh Kumar Chellappan3, Glenn Jacobson1, Alex C Bissember2, Jason A Smith2, Raj Eri4, Juan Canales9, Miguel Iglesias10, Nuri Guven1, Vanni Caruso1,8.
Abstract
Asperuloside is an iridoid glycoside found in many medicinal plants that has produced promising anti-obesity results in animal models. In previous studies, three months of asperuloside administration reduced food intake, body weight, and adipose masses in rats consuming a high fat diet (HFD). However, the mechanisms by which asperuloside exerts its anti-obesity properties were not clarified. Here, we investigated homeostatic and nutrient-sensing mechanisms regulating food intake in mice consuming HFD. We confirmed the anti-obesity properties of asperuloside and, importantly, we identified some mechanisms that could be responsible for its therapeutic effect. Asperuloside reduced body weight and food intake in mice consuming HFD by 10.5 and 12.8% respectively, with no effect on mice eating a standard chow diet. Fasting glucose and plasma insulin were also significantly reduced. Mechanistically, asperuloside significantly reduced hypothalamic mRNA ghrelin, leptin, and pro-opiomelanocortin in mice consuming HFD. The expression of fat lingual receptors (CD36, FFAR1-4), CB1R and sweet lingual receptors (TAS1R2-3) was increased almost 2-fold by the administration of asperuloside. Our findings suggest that asperuloside might exert its therapeutic effects by altering nutrient-sensing receptors in the oral cavity as well as hypothalamic receptors involved in food intake when mice are exposed to obesogenic diets. This signaling pathway is known to influence the subtle hypothalamic equilibrium between energy homeostasis and reward-induced overeating responses. The present pre-clinical study demonstrated that targeting the gustatory system through asperuloside administration could represent a promising and effective new anti-obesity strategy.Entities:
Keywords: CD36; FFAR1-4; TAS1R2-3; asperuloside; cannabinoid (CB) receptor 1; food intake; nutrient-sensing mechanisms; weight loss
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33927690 PMCID: PMC8076851 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.615446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Figure 1Effect of asperuloside on body weight, fat content, glucose, and insulin. (A) Change in body weight (δBW) of mice consuming standard chow diet (CHOW) (black triangle, n=10), and those treated with asperuloside (ASP) (open triangle, n=10); mice consuming high fat diet (HFD) (black circle, n=10), and treated with ASP (open circle, n=10). (B) Final body weight after 12 weeks of ASP administration (n=10). (C) Energy intake (EI) of mice consuming standard chow diet (black triangle, n=10), and treated with ASP (open triangle, n=10); mice consuming HFD (black circle, n=10), and treated with ASP (open circle, n=10). (D) Average of daily EI (n=10). (E) Visceral fat (epididymal and retroperitoneal fat pads) at killing calculated as percentage of wet weight to body weight (n=10). (F) Fasting blood glucose (n=10); (G) Plasma Insulin (n= 6) after 12 weeks of asperuloside administration. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. In graphs (A, C) data were analyzed by Repeated Measures three-way ANOVA with animal diet, drug treatment and weeks of treatment as factors. In graphs (B, D–G) data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with animal diet and drug treatment as factors. ANOVA results were then followed by a post hoc analysis using Fisher’s least significant difference test (LSD). *Significant ASP effect vs non-treated diet control (p < 0.05); #Significant overall diet effect (HFD and HFD+ASP) vs (CHOW and CHOW+ASP) (p < 0.05).
Figure 2mRNA levels of taste receptors in the tongue. (A) Cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36); (B) Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R); (C) Free fatty acid receptor 1 (FFAR1); (D) Free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFAR4); (E) Taste receptor type 1 member 2 (TAS1R2); (F) Taste receptor type 1 member 3 (TAS1R3). n=6–9. High fat diet (HFD), asperuloside (ASP). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with animal diet and drug treatment as factors. ANOVA results were then followed by a post hoc analysis using Fisher’s least significant difference test (LSD). *Significant ASP effect vs non-treated diet control (p < 0.05); #Significant overall diet effect (HFD and HFD+ASP) vs (CHOW and CHOW+ASP) (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Hypothalamic mRNA levels of orexigenic and anorexigenic markers consuming HFD. (A) Ghrelin receptor (B) Pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC); (C) Leptin receptor; (D) Cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1) n=6–9. High fat diet (HFD), asperuloside (ASP). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with animal diet and drug treatment as factors. ANOVA results were then followed by a post hoc analysis using Fisher’s least significant difference test (LSD). *Significant ASP effect vs non-treated diet control (p < 0.05); #Significant overall diet effect (HFD and HFD+ASP) vs (CHOW and CHOW+ASP) (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Descriptive mechanism of action of ASP. Mice consuming either a standard chow diet or HFD received 3 mg of ASP daily for 12 weeks. We hypothesize that ASP prevented weight gain in mice consuming HFD by altering nutrient-sensing mechanisms of the taste buds that are involved in the homeostatic and hedonic regulation of food intake (12, 14, 16, 18, 30, 35). In the taste buds, gustatory Type II cells express the plasma membrane receptor CD36 (cluster of differentiation 36), a receptor participating in the orosesory detection of dietary lipids (26). Type II cells also express the free fatty acid receptor 1 (FFAR1) and free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFAR4) which mediate orosensory responses to long and short-chain fatty acid respectively (12). They also express subfamilies of the taste receptor type 1 (TAS1R) which detect sweet, bitter, and the umami taste (16). The endocannabinoid system is also involved in the orosensory detection of dietary fatty acids (14). This physiological function is mediated by the activity of cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) (28) which additionally plays a major role in the enhancement of the sweet taste (29). When ASP was administered in mice consuming HFD, levels of CB1R, sweet (TAS1R2 and TAS1R3) and fat (CD36, FFAR1, and FFAR4) receptors were nearly doubled. FFAR1-4 and TAS1R2-3- are coupled to the G-protein α-gustducin (G-α-gus) which activates phospholipase C-β2 to promote the formation of inositol triphosphate (IP3) and the final release of intracellular Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (14, 17, 36). Similarly, when dietary lipids bind to CD36, this will ultimately result in the rise IP3 (14). The binding of IP3 to ER will release free Ca2+, followed by Ca2+ efflux (14). The increase in intracellular Ca2+ activates the transient receptor potential cation channel M5 (TRPM5) and then the voltage-gated Na+ channels allowing the entrance of Na+ ions and the outward current of K+ ions, inducing membrane depolarisation as well as ATP release (12, 16). At the same time, neurotransmitters and peptides involved in the regulation of food intake including NPY, ghrelin, and leptin are released to modulate autocrine and paracrine signaling within the taste bud itself and with afferent sensory nerves (13, 16). In response to taste stimulation, ATP release is increased into the cranial nerves VII and/or X and this elicits a greater afferent nutrient-sensing signal to the brain (12, 13, 17, 18, 35, 37). Taste signaling increases cortical activity in the mesolimbic pathway (regions of the brain associated with hedonic responses) which in turn send chemical signals to the hypothalamus for the regulation of food intake (35, 36). In the hypothalamus of mice consuming HFD, ASP downregulated the gene expression of appetite regulators including ghrelin, POMC, leptin, and CB1R (36, 38, 39). We hypothesize that ASP overstimulates taste buds signaling in response to high fat diet consumption leading to suppression of orexigenic signaling in the hypothalamus (12, 16, 18, 30, 35).