| Literature DB >> 33927211 |
Seemab Bashir1, Muhammad Ramzan2, Jae Dong Chung3, Yu-Ming Chu4,5, Seifedine Kadry6.
Abstract
The current study analyzes the effects of modified Fourier and Fick's theories on the Carreau-Yasuda nanofluid flow over a stretched surface accompanying activation energy with binary chemical reaction. Mechanism of heat transfer is observed in the occurrence of heat source/sink and Newtonian heating. The induced magnetic field is incorporated to boost the electric conductivity of nanofluid. The formulation of the model consists of nonlinear coupled partial differential equations that are transmuted into coupled ordinary differential equations with high nonlinearity by applying boundary layer approximation. The numerical solution of this coupled system is carried out by implementing the MATLAB solver bvp4c package. Also, to verify the accuracy of the numerical scheme grid-free analysis for the Nusselt number is presented. The influence of different parameters, for example, reciprocal magnetic Prandtl number, stretching ratio parameter, Brownian motion, thermophoresis, and Schmidt number on the physical quantities like velocity, temperature distribution, and concentration distribution are addressed with graphs. The Skin friction coefficient and local Nusselt number for different parameters are estimated through Tables. The analysis shows that the concentration of nanoparticles increases on increasing the chemical reaction with activation energy and also Brownian motion efficiency and thermophoresis parameter increases the nanoparticle concentration. Opposite behavior of velocity profile and the Skin friction coefficient is observed for increasing the stretching ratio parameter. In order to validate the present results, a comparison with previously published results is presented. Also, Factors of thermal and solutal relaxation time effectively contribute to optimizing the process of stretchable surface chilling, which is important in many industrial applications.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33927211 PMCID: PMC8085058 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87831-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the model.
Figure 2versus .
Figure 3versus .
Figure 4versus .
Figure 5versus .
Figure 6versus .
Figure 7versus .
Figure 8versus .
Figure 9versus .
Figure 10versus .
Figure 11versus .
Figure 12versus .
Figure 13versus .
Figure 14versus .
Figure 15versus .
Figure 16versus .
Figure 17versus .
Figure 18versus .
Figure 19versus .
Figure 20versus .
Numerical estimation of for different parameters.
| 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | − 0.4172815 |
| 0.2 | − 0.49195911 | |||
| 0.3 | − 0.57265426 | |||
| 0.4 | − 0.66085834 | |||
| 1.2 | − 0.53327392 | |||
| 1.3 | − 0.53897413 | |||
| 1.4 | − 0.54478907 | |||
| 0.4 | − 0.35475913 | |||
| 0.5 | − 0.35037484 | |||
| 0.6 | − 0.27708379 | |||
| 1.6 | − 0.42489466 | |||
| 1.7 | − 0.43325409 | |||
| 1.8 | − 0.44241708 |
Numerical estimation of for different parameters.
| 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.13792991 |
| 0.3 | 0.13804022 | |||||
| 0.4 | 0.13818509 | |||||
| 0.5 | 0.13838548 | |||||
| 0.2 | 0.27877992 | |||||
| 0.3 | 0.13790234 | |||||
| 0.4 | 0.13788854 | |||||
| 0.2 | 0.13795968 | |||||
| 0.3 | 0.13798945 | |||||
| 0.4 | 0.13801907 | |||||
| 0.4 | 0.13784733 | |||||
| 0.5 | 0.13776472 | |||||
| 0.6 | 0.13768207 | |||||
| 1.2 | 0.13794798 | |||||
| 1.3 | 0.13796686 | |||||
| 1.4 | 0.13798662 | |||||
| 1.0 | 0.20425922 | |||||
| 1.1 | 0.20969592 | |||||
| 1.2 | 0.2145712 |
Grid free analysis for the Nusselt number.
| S. no. | Grid size | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.17827252 | |
| 2 | 0.17821146 | |
| 3 | 0.17826705 | |
| 4 | 0.12915111 | |
| 5 | 0.12915111 | |
| 6 | 0.12915111 | |
| 7 | 0.12915111 |
Comparison of outcomes with Mahapatra and Gupta[47], Ishak et al.[48], Nazar et al.[49], Ali et al.[50], and Gireesha et al.[51]for co-efficient Skin friction considering by varying .
| [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | Present study | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | − 0.9694 | − 0.9694 | − 0.9694 | − 0.9694 | − 0.96938 | − 0.96933 |
| 0.2 | − 0.9181 | − 0.9181 | − 0.9181 | − 0.9181 | − 0.91810 | − 0.91811 |
| 0.5 | − 0.6673 | − 0.6673 | − 0.6673 | − 0.6673 | − 0.66723 | − 0.66724 |
| 1.0 | – | – | – | – | 0.90852 | 0.90853 |
| 2.0 | 2.0175 | 2.0175 | 2.0176 | 2.0175 | 2.01750 | 2.01752 |
| 3.0 | 4.7293 | 4.7294 | 4.7296 | 4.7293 | 4.72928 | 4.72930 |
| 4.0 | – | – | – | – | 8.00043 | 8.00046 |