| Literature DB >> 29487368 |
Dianchen Lu1, M Ramzan2,3, Noor Ul Huda4, Jae Dong Chung5, Umer Farooq1,6.
Abstract
A mathematical model is envisaged to study the axisymmetric steady magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Carreau nanofluid flow under the influence of nonlinear thermal radiation and chemical reaction past a radially stretched surface. Impact of heat generation/absorption with newly introduced zero mass flux condition of nanoparticles at the sheet is an added feature towards novelty of the problem. Further, for nanofluid the most recently organized model namely Buongiorno's model is assumed that comprises the effects thermophoresis and Brownian motion. Utilizing suitable self-similar transformations, the set of partial differential equations with high nonlinearity are converted into a dimensionless system of ordinary differential equations. Set of these transmuted equations are numerically solved by MATLAB built-in function bvp4c. Impact of germane parameters on all involved profiles are plotted to examine the heat and mass transfer characteristics. This study reveals that the temperature distribution is an escalating function of the heat generation and nonlinear radiation parameters. Also, it is noted that the incrementing values of chemical reaction parameter lowers the nanoparticles concentration profile. A comparison of the present investigation with already published explorations in limiting case is also added to authenticate the presented results; hence reliable results are being presented.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29487368 PMCID: PMC5829232 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22000-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flow geometry.
A comparison of values of f″(0) for varied values of M when We = 0 and n = 1.
|
| Makinde | Azam | Present results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | −1.17372 | −1.17372 | −1.173720 |
| 0.5 | −1.36581 | −1.36581 | −1.365814 |
| 1.0 | −1.53571 | −1.53571 | −1.535709 |
| 2.0 | −1.83049 | −1.83049 | −1.830490 |
| 3.0 | −2.08484 | −2.08485 | −2.084846 |
Numerically calculated values of skin friction for varied values of M,We and n.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1.3653398 | ||
| 1.0 | 1.5350602 | ||
| 1.5 | 1.6884948 | ||
| 2.0 | 1.8294374 | ||
| 0.05 | 1.3653398 | ||
| 2.0 | 1.0492851 | ||
| 4.0 | 0.85467461 | ||
| 6.0 | 0.75112133 | ||
| 0.5 | 1.3653398 | ||
| 1.0 | 1.3658144 | ||
| 1.5 | 1.3662882 | ||
| 2.0 | 1.3667611 |
Numerically calculated values of Nusselt number for varied values of M, We, n, N, θ, δ and N when Pr = 2.5 is fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1.8735119 | ||||||
| 1.0 | 1.7842637 | ||||||
| 1.5 | 1.7054868 | ||||||
| 2.0 | 1.6351292 | ||||||
| 0.05 | 1.8735119 | ||||||
| 2.0 | 1.6490202 | ||||||
| 4.0 | 1.4700974 | ||||||
| 6.0 | 1.3552638 | ||||||
| 0.5 | 1.8735119 | ||||||
| 1.0 | 1.8738067 | ||||||
| 1.5 | 1.874101 | ||||||
| 2.0 | 1.8743946 | ||||||
| 1.0 | 1.8735119 | ||||||
| 1.4 | 1.366576 | ||||||
| 1.8 | 1.0713273 | ||||||
| 2.2 | 0.87969914 | ||||||
| 1.1 | 1.8735119 | ||||||
| 1.3 | 2.0211788 | ||||||
| 1.5 | 2.1671585 | ||||||
| 1.7 | 2.3030379 | ||||||
| 0.03 | 1.8735119 | ||||||
| 0.15 | 1.6188128 | ||||||
| 0.25 | 1.3606069 | ||||||
| 0.35 | 1.0163158 | ||||||
| 0.5 | 1.8735119 | ||||||
| 1.5 | 1.5985311 | ||||||
| 2.5 | 1.3508399 | ||||||
| 3.5 | 1.1362272 |
Figure 2Graph of M versus ().
Figure 4Graph of M versus ().
Figure 5Graph of We versus ().
Figure 7Graph of We versus ().
Figure 8Graph of Pr versus θ(η).
Figure 9Graph of Pr versus ϕ(η).
Figure 10Graph of δ versus θ(η).
Figure 11Graph of δ versus ϕ(η).
Figure 12Graph of N versus θ(η).
Figure 13Graph of N versus ϕ(η).
Figure 14Graph of θ versus θ(η).
Figure 15Graph of θ versus ϕ(η).
Figure 16Graph of N versus θ(η).
Figure 17Graph of N versus ϕ(η).
Figure 18Behavior of () versus escalating values of chemical reaction parameter.
Figure 19Behavior of () versus escalating values of Brownian motion parameter.
Figure 20Behavior of () versus escalating values of Schmidt number.