Ling Wang1,2,3, Ian Norman2, Tao Xiao3, Yamin Li1, Mary Leamy2. 1. Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China. 2. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London SE1 8SW, UK. 3. Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Abstract
Worldwide commitment to disseminate Psychological First Aid (PFA) training to enable frontline workers to support distressed individuals and/or manage their own self-care is increasing, but the evidence base of PFA training is uncertain. METHOD: a scoping review was undertaken by searching seven databases and hand-searching grey literature to maximise coverage of potential studies. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Three PFA training models were commonly used in research studies. A broad selection of PFA training outcomes were observed including learning, behavior, satisfaction and practice in crisis mental and behavior health preparedness. CONCLUSIONS: Research evidence of reasonable quality demonstrates that PFA training significantly improves knowledge of appropriate psychosocial response and PFA skills in supporting people in acute distress, thereby enhancing self-efficacy and promoting resilience. However, this review highlights inadequate guidance on how PFA training should be applied and adapted, significant shortcomings of reporting PFA training delivery, limited training evaluation and unclear training outcomes. Whilst behavioral, knowledge and system impact of the PFA training are promising, methodologically stronger evaluations which include systematic training adaptation and selection of sensitive outcome measures is needed to strengthen future implementation of PFA training and thereby enhance population preparedness for future emergencies.
Worldwide commitment to disseminate Psychological First Aid (PFA) training to enable frontline workers to support distressed individuals and/or manage their own self-care is increasing, but the evidence base of PFA training is uncertain. METHOD: a scoping review was undertaken by searching seven databases and hand-searching grey literature to maximise coverage of potential studies. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Three PFA training models were commonly used in research studies. A broad selection of PFA training outcomes were observed including learning, behavior, satisfaction and practice in crisis mental and behavior health preparedness. CONCLUSIONS: Research evidence of reasonable quality demonstrates that PFA training significantly improves knowledge of appropriate psychosocial response and PFA skills in supporting people in acute distress, thereby enhancing self-efficacy and promoting resilience. However, this review highlights inadequate guidance on how PFA training should be applied and adapted, significant shortcomings of reporting PFA training delivery, limited training evaluation and unclear training outcomes. Whilst behavioral, knowledge and system impact of the PFA training are promising, methodologically stronger evaluations which include systematic training adaptation and selection of sensitive outcome measures is needed to strengthen future implementation of PFA training and thereby enhance population preparedness for future emergencies.
Entities:
Keywords:
PFA training; Psychological First Aid; capacity building; early psychosocial support; healthcare workers; mental and behavior health management; mental health and psychosocial support; mental health preparedness; non-specialist; psychosocial response
Authors: Stevan E Hobfoll; Patricia Watson; Carl C Bell; Richard A Bryant; Melissa J Brymer; Matthew J Friedman; Merle Friedman; Berthold P R Gersons; Joop T V M de Jong; Christopher M Layne; Shira Maguen; Yuval Neria; Ann E Norwood; Robert S Pynoos; Dori Reissman; Josef I Ruzek; Arieh Y Shalev; Zahava Solomon; Alan M Steinberg; Robert J Ursano Journal: Psychiatry Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.458
Authors: O Lee McCabe; George S Everly; Lisa M Brown; Aaron M Wendelboe; Nor Hashidah Abd Hamid; Vicki L Tallchief; Jonathan M Links Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Brian Allen; Melissa J Brymer; Alan M Steinberg; Eric M Vernberg; Anne Jacobs; Anthony H Speier; Robert S Pynoos Journal: J Trauma Stress Date: 2010-08
Authors: Lisa M Brown; Martha L Bruce; Kathryn Hyer; Whitney L Mills; Elizabeth Vongxaiburana; Lumarie Polivka-West Journal: Clin Gerontol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.619
Authors: Sonia Johnson; Christian Dalton-Locke; John Baker; Charlotte Hanlon; Tatiana Taylor Salisbury; Matt Fossey; Karen Newbigging; Sarah E Carr; Jennifer Hensel; Giuseppe Carrà; Urs Hepp; Constanza Caneo; Justin J Needle; Brynmor Lloyd-Evans Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 79.683
Authors: Hiroki Asaoka; Yuichi Koido; Yuzuru Kawashima; Miki Ikeda; Yuki Miyamoto; Daisuke Nishi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 3.390