Literature DB >> 33925381

Integration of Urinary EN2 Protein & Cell-Free RNA Data in the Development of a Multivariable Risk Model for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Prior to Biopsy.

Shea P Connell1, Robert Mills2, Hardev Pandha3, Richard Morgan4, Colin S Cooper1, Jeremy Clark1, Daniel S Brewer1,5.   

Abstract

The objective is to develop a multivariable risk model for the non-invasive detection of prostate cancer prior to biopsy by integrating information from clinically available parameters, Engrailed-2 (EN2) whole-urine protein levels and data from urinary cell-free RNA. Post-digital-rectal examination urine samples collected as part of the Movember Global Action Plan 1 study which has been analysed for both cell-free-RNA and EN2 protein levels were chosen to be integrated with clinical parameters (n = 207). A previously described robust feature selection framework incorporating bootstrap resampling and permutation was applied to the data to generate an optimal feature set for use in Random Forest models for prediction. The fully integrated model was named ExoGrail, and the out-of-bag predictions were used to evaluate the diagnostic potential of the risk model. ExoGrail risk (range 0-1) was able to determine the outcome of an initial trans-rectal ultrasound guided (TRUS) biopsy more accurately than clinical standards of care, predicting the presence of any cancer with an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) = 0.89 (95% confidence interval(CI): 0.85-0.94), and discriminating more aggressive Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 disease returning an AUC = 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.89). The likelihood of more aggressive disease being detected significantly increased as ExoGrail risk score increased (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.21 per 0.1 ExoGrail increase, 95% CI: 1.91-2.59). Decision curve analysis of the net benefit of ExoGrail showed the potential to reduce the numbers of unnecessary biopsies by 35% when compared to current standards of care. Integration of information from multiple, non-invasive biomarker sources has the potential to greatly improve how patients with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer are risk-assessed prior to an invasive biopsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TRIPOD; biomarker; liquid biopsy; machine learning; prostate cancer; urine

Year:  2021        PMID: 33925381     DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  40 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer heterogeneity: Discovering novel molecular targets for therapy.

Authors:  Chiara Ciccarese; Francesco Massari; Roberto Iacovelli; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Rodolfo Montironi; Vincenzo Di Nunno; Francesca Giunchi; Matteo Brunelli; Giampaolo Tortora
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 12.111

2.  The "PROMIS" of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cost Effectiveness in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis?

Authors:  Jochen Walz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Philip Cornford; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Maria De Santis; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Thomas Wiegel; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Richard M Martin; Jenny L Donovan; Emma L Turner; Chris Metcalfe; Grace J Young; Eleanor I Walsh; J Athene Lane; Sian Noble; Steven E Oliver; Simon Evans; Jonathan A C Sterne; Peter Holding; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Peter Brindle; Naomi J Williams; Elizabeth M Hill; Siaw Yein Ng; Jessica Toole; Marta K Tazewell; Laura J Hughes; Charlotte F Davies; Joanna C Thorn; Elizabeth Down; George Davey Smith; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, or radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: study design and diagnostic and baseline results of the ProtecT randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  J Athene Lane; Jenny L Donovan; Michael Davis; Eleanor Walsh; Daniel Dedman; Liz Down; Emma L Turner; Malcolm D Mason; Chris Metcalfe; Tim J Peters; Richard M Martin; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  A Novel Urine Exosome Gene Expression Assay to Predict High-grade Prostate Cancer at Initial Biopsy.

Authors:  James McKiernan; Michael J Donovan; Vince O'Neill; Stefan Bentink; Mikkel Noerholm; Susan Belzer; Johan Skog; Michael W Kattan; Alan Partin; Gerald Andriole; Gordon Brown; John T Wei; Ian M Thompson; Peter Carroll
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  DESNT: A Poor Prognosis Category of Human Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Bogdan-Alexandru Luca; Daniel S Brewer; Dylan R Edwards; Sandra Edwards; Hayley C Whitaker; Sue Merson; Nening Dennis; Rosalin A Cooper; Steven Hazell; Anne Y Warren; Rosalind Eeles; Andy G Lynch; Helen Ross-Adams; Alastair D Lamb; David E Neal; Krishna Sethia; Robert D Mills; Richard Y Ball; Helen Curley; Jeremy Clark; Vincent Moulton; Colin S Cooper
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2017-03-06

9.  Copy number variations in urine cell free DNA as biomarkers in advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yun Xia; Chiang-Ching Huang; Rachel Dittmar; Meijun Du; Yuan Wang; Hongyan Liu; Niraj Shenoy; Liang Wang; Manish Kohli
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-06-14

Review 10.  Incorporation of tissue-based genomic biomarkers into localized prostate cancer clinics.

Authors:  Marco Moschini; Martin Spahn; Agostino Mattei; John Cheville; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Liquid Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Management-Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Felice Crocetto; Gianluca Russo; Erika Di Zazzo; Pasquale Pisapia; Benito Fabio Mirto; Alessandro Palmieri; Francesco Pepe; Claudio Bellevicine; Alessandro Russo; Evelina La Civita; Daniela Terracciano; Umberto Malapelle; Giancarlo Troncone; Biagio Barone
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Urological Cancer Panorama in the Second Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Estibaliz López-Fernández; Javier C Angulo; José I López; Claudia Manini
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  A Model to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer Integrating Urinary Peptide and Extracellular Vesicle RNA Data.

Authors:  Shea P O'Connell; Maria Frantzi; Agnieszka Latosinska; Martyn Webb; William Mullen; Martin Pejchinovski; Mark Salji; Harald Mischak; Colin S Cooper; Jeremy Clark; Daniel S Brewer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.